I got through half the article, when I became convinced that:
as Hawaii had a legal process to certify numerous types of births either witnessed within Hawaii, or stamped approved based on all sorts of other scenerios, it would appear to me that had Dunham applied for a birth certificate under Hawaii laws, regardless of where Zer0 was lying in his manger at birth;
Hawaii would have declared him an American citizen, given full rights as a citizen at birth, and therefore as a citizen “with birth record in the US,” he probably has rights to call himself a “natural born citizen”.
Maybe my last paragraph summarizes what $1 mil in legal fees that Zer0 (actually Zer0’s campaign funds) have spent to convince the unwashed that this Socialist poseur is qualified to be president.
Disgusting!
Maybe the pig Sotomeier could explain her yes vote in more legalistic terminology.
BTY, it appears that there is no federal statute as to what the states must use to declare a person “born within their state.” Thus, this issue is probably legally residing within the state law.
Therefore, the @#$%ed up laws of 1961 Hawaii trump Federal law, and Zer0 could claim to be a citizen.
as Hawaii had a legal process to certify numerous types of births either witnessed within Hawaii, or stamped approved based on all sorts of other scenerios, it would appear to me that had Dunham applied for a birth certificate under Hawaii laws, regardless of where Zer0 was lying in his manger at birth;
Hawaii would have declared him an American citizen, given full rights as a citizen at birth, and therefore as a citizen “with birth record in the US,” he probably has rights to call himself a “natural born citizen”.
I haven't yet read his whole article yet, but I recall the Hawaiian DOH had investigation guidelines if fraud was suspected. If Obama's parent(s) lied, his "citizenship" status is in jeopardy.