Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26; All

If this happened under Bush or McCain, we would call it mutiny or desertion. It’s the same thing under a president we dislike. The vast majority of people in the armed forces understand that Obama is the Commander in Chief and do their duty.

It is very irresponsible for Freepers to support these actions. I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real, but even if it is, there are plenty of civillians to pursue it.


12 posted on 07/28/2009 10:52:30 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

I guess you haven’t been following along.... the courts keep ruling that we as citizens do not have the right to ensure that our President complies with the mandates of the constitution. Therefore, there are not civilians who are able to persue this action - many have tried - none were allowed.
Is it unreasonable to expect a person to prove “natural born citizenship” when it is clearly delineated in the constitution? Heck, my son had to show a birth certificate to play little league, and some might argue tha the Presidency is a little more important than second base!


20 posted on 07/28/2009 10:57:52 AM PDT by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real,

Why? You can't just throw out a charge of "mutiny" or "desertion" by saying: "Oh pish posh those sillies......"
I'd like to see your reasoning why you don't think the birth certificate "issue" is real if all these soldiers are nothing more than deserters.
Not to mention the fact that mutiny and desertion are two totally separate things, mutiny isn't always a bad thing.....

22 posted on 07/28/2009 10:58:37 AM PDT by brent13a (You're a Great American! NO you're a Great American! NO NO NO YOU'RE a Great American! Nooo.....WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real...

Then feel free to ignore the Obama bc threads from this point out. Repeating that you "don't believe it" ad nauseum isn't adding anything of value to the discussion.

26 posted on 07/28/2009 11:01:39 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Civies can’t get standing.


28 posted on 07/28/2009 11:03:25 AM PDT by ARA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Obama can NEVER be a lawful President of the USA because his father was a BRITISH SUBJECT, and Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth. He can never be a NATURAL Born Citizen as require by the US Constitution.

I take it the US Constitution is important to you?


30 posted on 07/28/2009 11:03:53 AM PDT by plenipotentiary (Free the Oil, Topple the Saudis. Confiscate Putins money. Disconnect Siberia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Mutiny or desertion would only apply if they said they won’t serve... regardless of the Birth Certificate situation. They’re simply questioning his authority at this point. And civilians have all been shut down for lack of standing, so that’s not really an option at this point.

This seems like the best way to get at the truth. I say “more power to them.”


36 posted on 07/28/2009 11:08:13 AM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
"It is very irresponsible for Freepers to support these actions. I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real, but even if it is, there are plenty of civillians to pursue it."

Apparently spoken as someone who never took the oath of enlistment. It is very irresponsible not to defend the Consitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. If you took that oath, you have a responsibility to defend the Constitution of the United States. To do otherwise is to abrogate your oath and responsibility. You are either an infiltrator tool or are very very clueless.

Oath as follows:
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
37 posted on 07/28/2009 11:08:50 AM PDT by LuxMaker (The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, Thomas J 1819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
It is very irresponsible for Freepers to support these actions.

These people are being sent to war by what could be an alien entity. If I were being sent, possibly to my death, to war by an Indonesian or Kenyan citizen, I would definitely object. Military personal take an oath to uphold the Constitution and protect the American citizens it serves. An alien president, who could very easily have loyalties to his home country, does not fit into this oath.

I believe the contrary. I think Freepers should overwhelmingly demand proof of citizenship by ANY president before we're subject to his/her authority. If anyone questions their citisensghip, those questions should be promptly answered on demand - especially for those in the military.

This is an important matter. Our next president could possibly be an illegal alien. After Oboma, who could stop it? A president has been set. The camels head is already in the tent.

38 posted on 07/28/2009 11:10:22 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Are you nuts? These military members are being true to their oaths! This is no more mutiny than refusing an order to shoot POWs!

If the BC is produced showing that the man occupying the White House was born in Hawaii; these men will salute and say “Yes, Sir! (I'm glad we got that cleared up, Sir!)”

60 posted on 07/28/2009 11:57:49 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

It is very irresponsible for soldiers to follow orders they believe are invalid.
Soldiers are citizens too, and have absolutely every right to confirm their orders are from legitimate sources.
If this happened under Bush or McCain, we would call it mutiny because the required proof of eligibility had already been shown, addressed, and the issue settled. Remember: McCain faced a comparable challenge, showed his papers, Congress addressed the issue and a solid conclusion was reached.

It’s not that BHO is disliked, it’s that mounting piles of circumstantial evidence is demanding presentation of proof of eligibility, and that demand is systematically denied in ways that just keeps piling on more circumstantial evidence. All the more reason to get the issue settled once and for all. McCain did, why doesn’t Obama?


67 posted on 07/28/2009 12:18:46 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
The vast majority of people in the armed forces understand that Obama is the Commander in Chief and do their duty.

How do you know this for fact? They could be waiting to see what happens. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America against ALL enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So they could be doing that with one eye on the law suits.
69 posted on 07/28/2009 12:24:41 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
If this happened under Bush or McCain, we would call it mutiny or desertion. It’s the same thing under a president we dislike. The vast majority of people in the armed forces understand that Obama is the Commander in Chief and do their duty.

Whether of not O is their commander in chief is the question still to be decided... because Mr. Obama ignores the simple request to prove it.

If any soldier receives orders, he must obey them, but he has the DUTY to ensure they are legal orders.

If a soldier, even one who was a plaintiff in such a case, received orders to report to Iraq, they have a duty to obey those orders, regardless of where the case is, short of a definitive verdict... and I'm sure they would report.

The duty to follow orders does not remove the ability to petition the courts to ensure those orders emanate from a legal source.

It is very irresponsible for Freepers to support these actions. I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real, but even if it is, there are plenty of civilians to pursue it.

No one knows if the birth certificate issue is real. The reason we do not know is not because of FReepers or anyone else other than the President himself. The President could have settled this issue months ago. The reason there are still questions about the birth certificate is because Mr. Obama will not disclose it.

The reason military people must be the ones to question this is because they are among the very few Americans with standing to be recognized as proper plaintiffs in this matter.

Don't worry about them. Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coasties; they are accustomed to getting the dirty, thankless jobs!

75 posted on 07/28/2009 12:58:02 PM PDT by MindBender26 ("Ok, so I screwed up... again. I'm 65. What are they going to do, send me back to Vietnam again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

BS.

Following legitimate orders implies that the person ordering them is legitimate. Our military is not stupid. They’ve been trained to identify an enemy. They are warriors and they’ve acquired skills as hunters; never the hunted. They’ve watched and listened to the usurper, and they detect disdain and hatred toward something our military is sworn to protect. They’re willing to lay their lives on the line for our Constuitution. It’s just that in this case, it may just be in the courtroom, and not on the battlefield.

I’m certain this is a growing movement.


149 posted on 07/28/2009 9:31:26 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So you think quite plainly then that Hitler ordered it should have been a defense at Nuremberg?


150 posted on 07/28/2009 9:41:38 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I don’t think the birth certificate “issue” is real, but even if it is, there are plenty of civillians to pursue it.

Good luck body!!!

Are you smoking something???

159 posted on 07/29/2009 12:36:07 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson