Skip to comments.Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates
Posted on 07/28/2009 7:34:23 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
There are so many smoking guns!
is that someone better find something that is hard,definable , believable, and easily proven outside of a court of law..and fast.
Is Danae still in Hawaii? Maybe she can go look at the microfiche and see if she can find the announcement of the twins before someone doctors it up if it hasn't happened already.
Thanks for the ping!
So if someone is from bayou country and when asked they answer “French” the clerk would just write that down?
Simply put, because:
DeCostas original Certificate was "Accepted by STATE Registrar"Think hard on that one ... one was Accepted, while one was not (yet it was Filed).
... while ...
Obamas original Certificate was "Filed by (Local) Registrar"
I know the Obots will have a reasonable explanation for that, just like the out of sequence birth certificate numbers between Obama and the Nordyke twins ...
Just in case your question wasn’t answered yet (I’m late to the thread as always), no one has seen the birth annoucement for the Nordyke twins.
So do I. O’Reilly has become the biggest spinner on TV when he LIED and said he had received and reviewed teh Obama birth certificate and it clearly sows Obama was born in Hawaii and said Obama is clearly an US citizen.
He is also parsing when he insists that Obama is an US citizen and failing to differentiate between this and NATURAL BORN citizen, which Obama is not and thus ineligible.
if O’Reilly has received a copy of the Certificate why does he not put up a copy on his on his program an dlet us all see it.
Tonight, he stated, “we have investigated this and Obama was born in Hawaii.” Based on what evidence.
We should FReep O’Reilly and send him Emails on this bloviating of falshoods and shattering the “no spin zone” - his now false claim to fame. We shold ask him to prove his statement by showing us the copy of what he saw.
It is amazing how far to the left and running interference for Obama, O’Reilly has swerved in the last few months.
Phil Dragoo posted a great graphic yesterday of O’Reilly, whose show I will not watch again as he has become irritating with his false declarations and spin.
I know Alan of AntiMulah plans to use it in an Email confronting O’Reilly. Perhaps we all should.
Thanks for the ping!
This suggests to me that the birth certificate was filed late by the grandmother.
IMO, he wanted Kerry (a friend of his, I believe) on the show. Likewise, he's covering for the Obama Admnistration -- he needs them as guests.
Thsi is developing finally.
I lost all respect for O’Reily several years ago when I saw a YouTube video of him when he was with PrimeTime Addition. In the video he was off the on air camera and he got ticked off at something the studio hands had done. He started screaming and banging his fist and using the F word at them over and over.
Yes, or something like this to change the original (possibly many times):
Someone needs to research and find the birth announcements for the twins with the lower registration numbers. Could be interesting....
Whatever the reason for his concealment of ALL of his records...we can be assured that something is terribly wrong.
Whether it's childish hubris on display, or damning proof of a Constitutional disqualification, his lack of transparency alone disqualifies him from being POTUS and proves him to be a danger to the United States. IMO
O’Reilly has been in stealth mode as an apologist for the Kenyan. He has been =, in his own way, an apologist for 0bama..
They said some folks were working on finding out if the twins birth announcements were in the paper, I never found out. The Obamas or the Dunhams never even lived at the address posted in his announcement.. Go figure!
Apparently the Hawaii Health Department had no such compunction. The way to prove this definitively would be for someone else with a 2-digit number on their long form to request a short form copy. Worth checking out, for thoroughness, but I'm much >99% certain there's nothing there. Because the numbering question a) should be easy enough to figure out, and more especially b) is a matter of state policy, I don't think anyone in the Obama camp owes we the people an answer.
They do owe us an answer regarding how much public and campaign money they've spent to protect the confidentiality of his long-form cert, and why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.