Just one problem:
Quoting from Post #13:
“The new certificate of birth shall show the true or probable foreign country of birth . . .”
Obama’s COLB lists Honolulu as place of birth.
Obamas COLB lists Honolulu as place of birth.
True OR PROBABLE. A foreign infant may not have verifiable documents to prove it's country of orign. They have to "assume."
That's why these certifications are not legally valid for citizenship identification. They don't know for sure where the infant was born.
Since the COLB lists Honolulu as place of birth, then why is the COLB necessary as a birth certificate? Arn’t COLBs for adopted or foreign born children?