Skip to comments.
Obama Administration Begins Opposition To States Claiming Sovereignty And Gun Rights
blacklistednews ^
| 7/26/2009
| Black Bear Blog
Posted on 07/29/2009 9:34:47 AM PDT by FlorianG
The several states are lining up to reclaim their sovereignty and telling the federal government to butt out. This is being done in myriad ways but all are related in that most claim that the Tenth Amendment protects the states from federal tyranny. States are passing resolutions, memorials and two states have passed laws and they intend to apply those laws for their citizens. The two states are Montana and Tennessee.
It was expected that at some point these laws would be challenged and it appears actions to do such has begun. The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has published open letters to federal firearms license holders in Montana and Tennessee explaining that federal law trumps state law when it comes to gun laws
(Excerpt) Read more at blacklistednews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; atf; banglist; batfe; bhobanglist; bhofascism; bootthebatfe; communism; donttreadonme; fascism; government; gunrights; jbt; lping; statesovereignty; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-104 next last
More Un-Constitutional crap coming from this administration.
1
posted on
07/29/2009 9:34:47 AM PDT
by
FlorianG
To: FlorianG
Of course, you cannot have such things under Socialism....
2
posted on
07/29/2009 9:36:11 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: FlorianG
If these states truly do stand up to the Feds, watch for mass immigration by die-hard conservatives like myself.
3
posted on
07/29/2009 9:37:19 AM PDT
by
ChocChipCookie
(Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
To: ChocChipCookie
watch for mass immigration by die-hard conservatives like myself.
Now,where did I put that darned "For Sale-By Owner-CHEEP!" sign?? ;)
4
posted on
07/29/2009 9:40:10 AM PDT
by
gimme1ibertee
(Time to CLEAN HOUSE (AND Senate!!!) Kick their butts to the curb!!)
To: FlorianG
Nothing Hussein would like more than to stir up something and have another Tim McVeigh rush in to rescue his presidency.
5
posted on
07/29/2009 9:41:37 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: ChocChipCookie; tx_eggman
Great men like Sam Houston and Davey Crockett once came from Tennessee to assist the great nation of Texas. I suppose we owe them.
I’m in.
6
posted on
07/29/2009 9:42:17 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
To: FlorianG
I heard a radio interview with Randy Terrill - Oklahoma State Rep. He has introduced a bill to place a measure on the ballot in 2010 to make English the official language in Oklahoma. Our Attorney General received a letter from attorney general Holder threatening to with hold federal funds if it passes. Our state legislators are pissed to say the least!
holder and buckwheat can go pound sand! If it was up to me, I’d dig up and cut every road in the state that accesses a federal facility (office, military base, park, etc) and tell the feds to kiss my ass!.....red
7
posted on
07/29/2009 9:42:53 AM PDT
by
rednek
("Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.")
To: FlorianG
They can come and get my guns any time. Unfortunately, I was out in my canoe on lake Pend O’reille with all my guns and the canoe capsized in the deepest part of the lake; like 1100 feet deep. I lost every single one of them. Darn!
8
posted on
07/29/2009 9:43:57 AM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the hell out of the way!)
To: rednek
Our Attorney General received a letter from attorney general Holder threatening to with hold federal funds if it passesJust with hold the funds first, why send D.C. tax money to get only 73 to 92 % back, never made sense to me.
The gov't cannot function without tax revenue.
9
posted on
07/29/2009 9:46:28 AM PDT
by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: FlorianG
The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has published open letters to federal firearms license holders in Montana and Tennessee explaining that federal law trumps state law when it comes to gun laws.
While the ATF is citing federal law they should also cite Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution that lists all the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. No where in Article 1 Section 8 is it listed that Congress has the power to create a federal police force including the ATF. The ATF is unconstitutional.
10
posted on
07/29/2009 9:48:43 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
To: FlorianG
If the states don’t fund the feds then they have no control/power.This is going to get very ugly.The states have the power on their side.
11
posted on
07/29/2009 9:51:11 AM PDT
by
taxtruth
To: FlorianG
From the day Obama was elected, the people rushed to stores buying up guns and ammunition at unprecedented rates. With the combination of a new president and staff known to want to ban gun and gun sales and the District of Columbia vs. Heller ruling, it has helped spur more laws to relax gun restrictions. This, I am positive, angers the Obama administration. Angers? The Bammie administration is figuratively bleeding from their ears.
When The Øne blinked and stupidly announced in front of national news cameras that there was no need to run out and buy guns EVERYONE knew exactly what to do.
Run out and buy several guns and as much ammo as was (and is) on the shelves. Keep right on buying guns and ammo until The Øne is back in his hole in Chicago.
That is exacty what is occurring and there is not a damn thing The Øne can do about it.
Except perhaps get in front of the cameras on nearly a daily basis and lie like Bagdad Bob
oh, wait, that is exactly what he is doing as we type and read.
12
posted on
07/29/2009 9:53:29 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: oneolcop
“I lost every single one of them”
THIS would make a grown man cry.
13
posted on
07/29/2009 10:00:59 AM PDT
by
beefree
(Holster up, ladies and gentlemen.)
To: fso301
He wants to stir things up enough where he can declare martial law, suspend the Constitution and become supreme leader.
He will do whatever it takes to taunt someone into doing something he feels merits taking charge. I think he is in for a surprise as I believe it will start in his beloved “Rat” Big Blue Cities. Chicago, Detroit, LA, or NYC.
Gunner
14
posted on
07/29/2009 10:01:07 AM PDT
by
weps4ret
(Where is John Galt?)
To: taxtruth
If the states dont fund the feds then they have no control/power.This is going to get very ugly.The states have the power on their side. Fed's got the nukes. So yeah this could get REALLY ugly.
15
posted on
07/29/2009 10:05:07 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Only feces and dead fish go with the flow.)
To: Man50D
Ding! Ding! Ding!
That’s a winner folks.
How true.
16
posted on
07/29/2009 10:05:46 AM PDT
by
devistate one four
(Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
To: weps4ret
He wants to stir things up enough where he can declare martial law, suspend the Constitution and become supreme leader. And that's when the civil war will start.
17
posted on
07/29/2009 10:06:04 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Only feces and dead fish go with the flow.)
To: taxtruth
True. It’s not their money.
18
posted on
07/29/2009 10:16:30 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Centurion2000
>>Fed's got the nukes. So yeah this could get REALLY ugly.<<
I agree that this is going to get ugly; but nukes? What exactly would be the purpose of turning your own country into a radioactive parking lot? It's not like there would be anyone left to push around, or make speeches to, or wield power.
19
posted on
07/29/2009 10:17:29 AM PDT
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
To: ChocChipCookie
If these states truly do stand up to the Feds... The Feds won't back off. They will send in tanks if they have to.
20
posted on
07/29/2009 11:01:11 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(BLOAT - Buy lots of ammo today)
To: weps4ret
> believe it will start in his beloved Rat Big Blue Cities. Chicago, Detroit, LA, or NYC.
Considering that those cesspools are heavily Union controlled Democrat strongholds with huge black populations, I do believe that your statement is wishful thinking...
Think again.
21
posted on
07/29/2009 11:22:13 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: TexasRepublic
The Feds won't back off. They will send in tanks if they have to. The ATF use tanks in America? Nah.
22
posted on
07/29/2009 11:25:06 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: NTHockey
It's not like there would be anyone left to push around, or make speeches to, or wield power. Incinerate one city as an example.
23
posted on
07/29/2009 11:30:26 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Only feces and dead fish go with the flow.)
To: FlorianG
Am I not mistaken or were the laws written specifically to include only native firearms sold to resident citizens thus making the commerce clause moot? Without commerce the feds should have NO jurisdiction in the matter.
24
posted on
07/29/2009 11:32:25 AM PDT
by
BlueNgold
(... Feed the tree!)
To: TexasRepublic
The states are already ganging up on the fed and the pen should be the weapon of choice to be used in the USSC argument.Remember the states created the national government for a more perfect union.It has become far from perfect and more like a national dictatorship run via control freaks.
25
posted on
07/29/2009 11:33:12 AM PDT
by
taxtruth
To: ForGod'sSake; bamahead; Joe Brower
26
posted on
07/29/2009 11:34:14 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: BlueNgold
thus making the commerce clause moot? Wickard v Filburn.
27
posted on
07/29/2009 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: FlorianG
The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has published open letters to federal firearms license holders in Montana and Tennessee explaining that federal law trumps state law when it comes to gun laws.Federal law does trump state laws on gun regulations. Too bad the feds don't read the Constitution.
If politicians don't read their own bills, who expects law enforcement to read the laws?
28
posted on
07/29/2009 11:51:10 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
To: rednek
I like the way you think, red!
29
posted on
07/29/2009 11:52:09 AM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(If Randy Cunningham is in prison for corruption, then why isn't Diane Feinstein locked up as well?)
To: oneolcop; beefree
I lost all of mine in a bungee jumping accident. Should of never used velcro.
30
posted on
07/29/2009 11:54:04 AM PDT
by
scramjet
(I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.)
To: bill1952
BATF = Burn All Toddlers First
31
posted on
07/29/2009 11:56:55 AM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(If Randy Cunningham is in prison for corruption, then why isn't Diane Feinstein locked up as well?)
To: Centurion2000
Yeah, like they’re going to nuke Jackson Hole or Houston.
32
posted on
07/29/2009 11:57:31 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(John Galt was exiled.)
To: fso301
Even Tim McVeigh came to understand that his actions were unproductive. He stated he should have followed the Bowman strategy instead of the Turner strategy.
33
posted on
07/29/2009 11:59:23 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: oneolcop
They can come and get my guns any time. Unfortunately, I was out in my canoe on lake Pend Oreille with all my guns and the canoe capsized in the deepest part of the lake; like 1100 feet deep. I lost every single one of them. Darn! Wow! Me too... only.. no wait, my guns were all stolen by ACORN burglars during the election...
34
posted on
07/29/2009 12:06:33 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: FlorianG
35
posted on
07/29/2009 12:07:35 PM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree and think 25 to life would be appropriate.)
To: EdReform; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
36
posted on
07/29/2009 12:08:42 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
To: taxtruth
The states are already ganging up on the fed and the pen should be the weapon of choice to be used in the USSC argument.Remember the states created the national government for a more perfect union.It has become far from perfect and more like a national dictatorship run via control freaks. The states should get together and vote the Federal government out of existence and replace it with a VERY LIMITED administrative organ with NO legislative or executive authority. Let the administrator report to a national congress of state governors...
37
posted on
07/29/2009 12:09:18 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Lurker; BlueNgold
Wickard v Filburn : Farmer grows grain for his own livestock; was deemed subject to regulation thereof as commodity grain was indistinguishable from what commonly moves in interstate commerce.
Raich : Terminally ill elderly woman grew pot for own medical use under doctor's supervision as allowed by CA law; was deemed subject to regulation* thereof as reducing demand in an illegal interstate market.
Stewart : Convicted felon makes homemade machinegun, impossible to legally move in interstate commerce (can neither buy nor sell); was deemed subject to regulation* per Raich verdict.
Ergo, the commerce clause is moot. These states may declare portions of their intra-state arms market not subject to federal regulation, but Wickard established the "fungible" principle despite obvious non-interstate use, Raich applied it despite state legality, and Stewart applied it to firearms. These states are trying to forge a path in already-paved territory.
(* - to wit: prohibition)
38
posted on
07/29/2009 12:09:43 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(John Galt was exiled.)
To: Lucky9teen
We went to purchase a new pistol last night and this picture was on the wall at the shop next to an enlarged blog article about the birth certificate issue.
I always feels so at home in gun shops. :)
39
posted on
07/29/2009 12:10:05 PM PDT
by
JenB987
To: bill1952
If they want to try this again, I suggest they turn around first and notice what’s pointed at them...
40
posted on
07/29/2009 12:11:02 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: bill1952
And people call me crazy when I say the 2nd should protect RPGs.
41
posted on
07/29/2009 12:11:09 PM PDT
by
Rodebrecht
(If everybody just left everybody else alone, everybody would be a lot happier.)
To: ctdonath2
Yeah, like theyre going to nuke Jackson Hole or Houston Maybe just Austin and Cheyenne. Once the velvet gloves come off and political correctness is thrown by the wayside, what makes you think that the hammers wont get used?
42
posted on
07/29/2009 12:14:14 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Only feces and dead fish go with the flow.)
To: FlorianG
“The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has published open letters to federal firearms license holders in Montana and Tennessee explaining that federal law trumps state law when it comes to gun laws”
And the Constitution trumps federal law.
43
posted on
07/29/2009 12:16:01 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: taxtruth
Don’t expect wannabe dictators to play by conventional rules. When the pen fails, they will resort to violence.
44
posted on
07/29/2009 12:16:07 PM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(BLOAT - Buy lots of ammo today)
To: April Lexington
This is the best idea I’ve heard all week.
45
posted on
07/29/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: bill1952; April Lexington
It’s almost difficult to believe this actually happened...
46
posted on
07/29/2009 12:19:21 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: Centurion2000
18,000,000 deer hunters. ‘nuff said.
47
posted on
07/29/2009 12:19:52 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(John Galt was exiled.)
To: ctdonath2
I think it’s a mistake for the states to give the FEDERAL courts jurisdiction on the subject of state sovereignty. It’s an inherent conflict of interest.
Basically, any law outside of Article I, Section 8 powers of the fedgov has no jurisdiction outside of the states.
48
posted on
07/29/2009 12:19:58 PM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: Rodebrecht
I don’t think you’re crazy at all.
49
posted on
07/29/2009 12:21:35 PM PDT
by
djsherin
(Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
To: taxtruth
The Constitution is a CONTRACT under which the general government entity was formed by permission of the pre-existing state entities.
The CREATED entity is now in violation of the contract under which it was created in the first place.
50
posted on
07/29/2009 12:22:42 PM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson