Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONDEMNED BY THEIR OWN LAPTOPS (Emails show real reason Doc Savage is on banlsit)
New York Post ^ | 7-29-09 | John O'Sullivan

Posted on 07/29/2009 3:08:15 PM PDT by dynachrome

. He'd never have made the elementary error of putting the real reasons for banning Savage in a confidential e-mail. He'd know that the final destination of confidential Labor government mail is the front page of the conservative Daily Mail.

Which is where the internal Home Office e-mails relating to Savage's exclusion from Britain ended up this week.

----------------------------------

The answer is that naming and shaming Savage was a low exercise in cheap politics all too characteristic of the Brown government

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: banned; conservativeicon; muzzies; realdeal; savagenation; savge; talkradio; uk
The gang that couldn't shoot straight, English style!
1 posted on 07/29/2009 3:08:16 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“List” Geez


2 posted on 07/29/2009 3:09:55 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 09Patriot; abigail2; BellStar; b4its2late; Blue Turtle; BootsOfEscaping; Brad's Gramma; ...

More on Savge being banned in UK


3 posted on 07/29/2009 3:10:37 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

... and the reason other talk show hosts, ie, Rush, Hannity, etc didn’t come to his aid is the way he, Savage, diss’d them. Calling Rush and Hannity all sorts of names on his show.


4 posted on 07/29/2009 3:15:55 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

A lengthy but good article.


5 posted on 07/29/2009 3:16:20 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
(Emails show real reason Doc Savage is on banlsit)


6 posted on 07/29/2009 3:20:19 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

hah. That’s pretty funny. ‘bout like the real emails the dummies in the UK used.


7 posted on 07/29/2009 3:24:00 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

733 words by my computer word counter. I was actually disappointed there wasn’t more meat to this article!


8 posted on 07/29/2009 3:24:09 PM PDT by Clarence (back to lurking now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Looks like a perverse quota system to avoid accusations of racial profiling.

Kind of like strip searching granny at the airport.


9 posted on 07/29/2009 3:25:40 PM PDT by Califreak (My word calibrator's in the shop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Are Monk, Ham, Johnny, Renny, and Long Tom banned too?


10 posted on 07/29/2009 3:26:49 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

That’s it alright.

The violent muzzies might get even more violent if the list isn’t “balanced”


11 posted on 07/29/2009 3:27:19 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

patricia, chemistry and habeus corpus to?.....


12 posted on 07/29/2009 3:28:56 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

oops....sorry, meant for post # 10, MrEdd’s.


13 posted on 07/29/2009 3:32:09 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Photobucket
14 posted on 07/29/2009 3:32:09 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

A government with balls could use that to their advantage...


15 posted on 07/29/2009 3:35:55 PM PDT by Califreak (My word calibrator's in the shop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I see that their listing had a quota attached, of picking at least one of each category of “unacceptable people.” Savage fit the “Jew” box to offset the Muslim terrorists, and demonstrate the “fairness” of the process, so they could meet their quota to “balance” the listing.

After all, it is important to appear to be fair in a mad, mad, mad, mad world.


16 posted on 07/29/2009 5:13:37 PM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The article says that it would be fun to see Savage cross-examined by the British elite lawyers. No, the real fun would be to see Savage’s lawyers cross-examine the members of parliament; Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Interior Minister Jacqui Smith and the the bureaucrats. That would be a hoot.


17 posted on 07/30/2009 8:00:42 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson