The BC shows the age of the father as 25. That means he was shown as having a 1936 birth year when he himself was declaring a 1934 birth year.
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
He was interviewed September 19, 1959 in an article that appeared in The Saturday Star Bulletin, in which he was described as a 25 year old Business Administration Major.
Kenya had no higher education institutions, the high school at Maseno from which he graduated was a trade school. Where then, was he educated to enable him to take up a university scholarship?
“The same hand which completed the form dated April 21, 1964 - wrote the name Barack Obama TWICE on the memo in August 1961.”
This would imply that the same hand forged both documents which would imply that the INS FOIA documents were all forged. As I explain below, I see no evidence of that, and I have had to assess many signatures professionally, though I don’t claim to be an expert.
With reference to the numerous signatures at the link below...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File
BHO Sr. has a very distinctive and mostly consistent way of writing the capital ‘B’ in Barack which is not used in the memo purported by be written by Mr. Wood in the 1964 memo.
The short version of my analysis is that Senior makes his ‘B’ with two strokes and Wood makes his ‘B’ with a single stroke.
Sr.’s ‘B’ begins with a single down-stroke which often starts too low to form a complete left side of a ‘B’. Then he lifts the pen and begins the two loops of the ‘B’ beginning at the top left of the letter. This results in a notable gap (the size varies) between where the initial downstroke of the ‘B’ started and where the first loop of the second stroke begins at the top left of the letter ‘B’.
Wood’s ‘B’ begins with a downstroke starting high on the left and then he retraces back up that first stroke to begin the loops without lifting the pen. So Wood’s ‘B’ is completed with a single stroke in both examples in the memo. There is no open gap on the left side of the top ‘B’ loop in Wood’s ‘B’s, as there is with Senior’s.
Also, when Sr. finishes his ‘B’ he adds a little delimited loop on the bottom of the lower ‘B’ loop. When continuing with the lower case portion of “Barack,’ Sr. lifts the pen after completing the loop on the ‘B’ and begins the lowercase ‘a’ at the top right of the letter before circling counter-clockwise to complete the letter. Sr. does not retrace across the top of the first ‘a’ in Barack, but Wood does.
Wood doesn’t lift his pen when going from finishing the capital ‘B’ before going to the ‘a’ in the first instance of ‘Barack’ at the top of the memo. Wood cursively goes directly from completing the ‘B’ to begin the top of the ‘a’ at the top right of the letter and retraces the top counter-clockwise before completing the ‘a’ and going on.
These are two very distinctive writing styles, by different people, IMO. I see no evidence or implication of forgery in these or any of the INS FOIA documents.
Take a good look at the document dated August 31, 1961. That's about three weeks after the miracle in Hawaii. Note carefully, what has been written by the kenyan student and what has been added by another hand...and how that information coincides with the handwritten memo ALSO DATED 31ST AUGUST 1961.
Looking at the two docs you posted(exclude memo for the moment)
The 1962 doc has 1934 for the birth year.
Two years later....
the 1964 doc has 1936 filled in for the birth year!
Looks like he lied to buy himself more time!
1961 forged b.c. doesn’t fit the timeline because it has 1936 birth year.
“There’s another ‘simple’ explanation...he simply wasn’t married to Kezia and he had no children. In ‘Dreams’ words are put into the mouth of Auma; ‘granny’ Sarah tells them, as they dispute who should inherit, none of you are his children”
“Dreams” is totally unreliable and has been forensically demonstrated to have been extensively penned by Bill Ayers, IMO.
The simple explanation is that Sr. was an opportunistic serial liar who put down whichever wives and children he thought would benefit him most at the time, just as he did with his birth year.
On the record, Kezia says she had a tribal marriage with Senior and legitimate biographers at least more independent than Ayers have not even hinted at finding any evidence that Roy and Auma were not BHO Sr.’s children.
In one of the FOIA documents where ‘wife’ is asked for a name appearing to have been a K for Kezia is crossed out and Ann S. Dunham is written in. Just the fact that the name of one wife is scratched out and another substituted implies at least one additional wife.
Also in one of the FOIA docs ‘Roy Obama’ is named as his son when children are asked for (but not Barry). This son had to come from a prior marriage as declaring bastard children to the INS would be out of the question in 1961, I would think.
In the FOIA docs U of HI officials report to INS that BHO Sr. is believed to still be married in Kenya, even though he ‘married’ Stanley Ann after getting her ‘happa’. INS makes a note to challenge any claim by Sr. to have been married to Stanley Ann based on bigamy and an attempt at using a sham marriage to gain or extend entry to the US.
The Mboya letters archive have BHO Sr. asking Mboya to assist his wife in Nairobi while he is completing his studies at Harvard. I have seen no evidence that the Mboya archive is forged.
Thanks for the ping.
ping to several comments..
The BC shows the age of the father as 25. That means he was shown as having a 1936 birth year when he himself was declaring a 1934 birth year.
I'm going to let you decide what content on this document was written by the kenyan student and what content was added by ANOTHER HAND.
So who was Kezia’s husband & the father of HER kids?
The following are darker ink:
Legal separation 2 mos ago
Barack Obama 2nd, 2 yrs
Has one?
The following does not agree with the “have not” filled in next to the part about is he employed or have a business in the us:
Harvard
Part time research
1500/yr. 1962-1964
Harvard 1500 grant & tuition per year
Who knows? You must have missed the story that the reason the kenyan wasn’t concerned about having girlfriends and wives after he left Kenya, was that he found out Kezia had had two children in his absence.
So if two of them weren’t fathered by the kenyan, how would you know which were his children, or to whom Kezia was married?
But far more telling, is that Malik, who is supposed to be the eldest, and would rightfully have inherited the land that belonged to his grandfather and then his father, DID NOT INHERIT.
When he wanted to build a mosque on the clan land, he had to ask ‘granny’ Sarah. And I believe she refused. She could not do otherwise. Her son, Yusuf, who is supposedly the eldest son of Onyango, IS STILL ALIVE.
Senior’s Estate
Obama writes in “Dreams...”:
...”It’s this business with the Old Man’s estate. Sarah is one of the people who has disputed the will. She’s been telling people that Roy, Bernard, myself — that none of us are the Old Man’s children.” Auma sighed. “I don’t know. A part of me sympathizes with her. She’s had a hard life. She never had the chances the Old Man had, you see, to study or go abroad. It made her very bitter. She thinks that somehow my mum, myself, that we are to blame for her situation.”
“But how much could the Old Man’s estate be worth?”
“Not much. Maybe a small government pension. A piece of worthless land. I try to stay out of it. Whatever is there has probably been spent on lawyers by now. But you see, everyone expected so much from the Old Man. He made them think that he had everything, even when he had nothing. So now, instead of getting on with their lives, they just wait and argue among themselves, thinking that the Old Man somehow is going to rescue them from his grave...”
Read between the lines. “Granny” Sarah, as the wife of Onyango, mother of YUSUF, JANE, ZEITUNI, OMAR AND SAYID, had every right to protect the inheritance of HER CHILDREN. To allow the children of Kezia to make claims, would have eliminated the rights of her ELDEST SON YUSUF.
It was not just a matter of inheritance, culturally, as the mother of the eldest son of ONYANGO, she would have lost her STATURE in the tribe.
Who is NOW the tribal elder? It isn’t MALIK!
It’s YUSUF! The older brother of Barak Hussein Obama Onyango. He wears the hat of an elder, and carries the whisk which proclaims his tribal position.
http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/senior.htm
The cap and the whisk denote his position as the Clan Elder.Chuckle. He's the only one who never married and had children. Maybe he's gay?
And now I'm outa here, there's a bad odour following me as usual. Anything else you might need you'll probably find on the page-link to THE OBAMA FILE.
Brown deer
Looking at posts #850, (854), 855, 856, (857,858), 859, 863, (864), and 867....
I think the b.c. is the document that is out of place w.r.t. the birth year used.
Do you see any other discrepancy ?
Seizethecarp,
Looking at posts #850, (854), 855, 856, (857,858), 859, 863, (864), and 867....
I think the b.c. is the document that is out of place w.r.t. the birth year used.
FWIW: Page 25 at this link, from 1963, shows a birth year of 1936: http://www.scribd.com/doc/59560239/FOIA-Release-Records-Relating-to-Barry-Soetoro-Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Barack-Obama-Sr-Lolo-Soetoro-Department-of-Homeland-Security
Also, pages 27 and 29 and 31 from August 1962 show 1936. However, page 32 from June 1962 shows 1934.
I haven’t checked the rest, but it appears as if he decided to lie between June and August 1962.
See #10868, what is your opinion of it? There’s a goof about is he employed... some parts are darker ink...
Put “10” in front of those post numbers I posted to you
Ten THOUSAND
:0
Let me know what you come up with, looking at the list in post 10875.
Many thanks,
WH57
Hi Green! On 31st August, 1961, he has a birth year of 1934, and that form is dated three weeks after the miracle in Hawaii. Now that means the LFBC should show his age in 1961 as 27. But it doesn't, it shows his age as 25. You don't think 'they' did all this just to make us crazy?
And then of course, you have to take into consideration that the interview conducted in September 1959 in the Star Bulletin has him as aged 25. I give up, my head just can't take it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.