Skip to comments.Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsidEdited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
click here to read article
If it’s okay w you, I’ll stick w the point that unless & until Obama’s medical records are unsealed, we just don’t know. That is really the full extent of my knowledge on the subject. I only wish we knew more.
I do not know how or where Obama sustained his scars. In point of fact, neither do you. All you have is speculation. There’s nothing wrong w speculation. But pushing it as anything more than speculation is invalid. Pushing me to go along w your speculation is unnecessary. Please respect the fact that I do not know how Obama got his scars. Thank you.
If you are not willing to speculate and think of ways to get to the truth by engaging in constructive discourse then you have nothing to offer here. Enjoy the posts from afar, let people who are actively looking for the truth look and share their thoughts, ideas, and speculate!!!!
My memory was mistaken. It is the UW transcript which includes the course detail for 8 UH 1960 credits transferred to UW including 4 for Russian and 4 for Philosophy.
The computer generated transcript backs up and matches the image of the transcript file “card” was sent directly to Corsi by Madolyne Lawson, Office of Public Records on July 29, 2009 under her signature. See page 200 of Corsi’s book, WTBC)
The 2009 issued UW transcript image is on the internet at:
Note that the start date for the fall 1961 courses on this transcript is reported as 08/19/61. An updated UW transcript received by Corsi from UW in Feb 2011 shows the fall courses starting on 09/19/61 (page 204 of Corsi’s book, WTBC). So Corsi did “change his mind” as to the start date of Ann’s
I have not yet seen a course detail released by UH for UH courses for Ann, but on page 196 of Corsi’s book WTBC the transcript summary from Stuart Lau can be seen.
Lau’s UH transcript is totally consistent with and thus cross-corroborates the UW transcripts because it records Stanley Ann Dunham as attending UH in Fall 1960 and then re-enrolling in Spring 1963.
The UW transcripts show exactly which two courses SADO took at UH prior to enrolling at UW and were accepted as transfer credits at UW.
The UW transcript shows SADO leaving UW in the Spring of 1962 in time to re-enroll at UH in Spring 1963. Typed in notes on the UW transcript “card” image have typed entries made in the 1970s reflecting SADO as completing her BA and MA at UH.
Corsi would be liable to a huge civil fraud judgment for forging and publishing transcripts purporting to be from these state institutions regarding POTUS Barry’s mom. The state AGs of HI and WA would represent the universities and be all over Corsi and WND if claims by David and others of forgery were true.
Ping to photos at # 11,485, note leg scar; then check out Getty images of 0bama’s head injuries shown at this link:
And then wonder why they don’t get a response!
lol, now go back to the two prvious articles I posted and try the ‘can you spot the difference’ formula with them.
The head and leg scar photos posted at #11,485 recall a discussion here a couple of years ago about a young man who possibly could have been BHO involved in a serious auto accident in Hawaii in the early 1980s. There was a court report relating to this accident and I believe the driver may have been charged with a misdemeanor. But I can't recall the name the driver was using at the time. Perhaps someone can refresh our memories on the details.
All I said was that I do not know how Obama got his scars. I’m sorry if that excites you so much.
I suppose if I really tried, I could get you a phone number for the author and you could ask him how often he goofed...depends on what you expect from a terrorist who is now some sort of hallowed professor. But of course even he was handicapped by what zero and SAD told him while they were hunkered down creating the story-board. Some people who are so very eager to jump in and help, often get used. Even Ayres must know that by now. Your lawyer might tell you, if I’m going to defend you, I need the whole story. It seems Ayres didn’t get the whole story, they didn’t tell him about Mary baby-sitting for Anna in January, or that she lived in Seattle. Wonder why not?
Re: SADO in Washington state in 1961 :
Post # 866 clarifies that SADO also was in Hawaii in 1961.
The author of the article found that SADO’s SSN was used in Washington state in 1961.
And his LFBC shows his mother as (Stanley) Ann Dunham - but one of the layers shows that the name that was there was Ann D.....something, and (Stanley) was squeezed in, in brackets, and to which ‘unham’ has been added to the capital ‘D’ to create the name of the ‘mother’ - and you still think we can’t question every document we see?
What IF that transcript is a similar amalgum of the records of a number of students?
The LFBC is an amalgum imo of the birth records of the child born in January, the child referred to in the adoption memo and the birth of another child, because the date and the name of the mother weren’t ‘suitable’ they used a certificate number more suitable to the date they claimed zero was born. It had to be in August because that gave her time to ‘graduate’ from Mercer and enroll in Hawaii. But what lets them down is that no one saw her there, the BC shows the date of birth of a child who lived for only one day - it was lodged on the same day the birth/death of Virginia was published - and the first time SAD physically shows up in Hawaii is when the boy is more than two years old.
But you cannot deal with these anomalies, because you have staked your very existence here on the validity of the documents - presented to you in cyberspace which you have never seen - just as no one has seen or held the LFBC, nor the so-called U of WA transcript, which it seems to me, Jerome Corsi accepted on face value when it was sent to him by e-mail without provenance.
He’s no fool. He’ll deal with that in his own time and in his own way, without leaving himself open to accusations of libel. He lives in the real world, in which everyone knows who and where he is.
Unlike your anonymous self.
The mother starts off as Ann D.....and doesn't become Stanley Ann Dunham Obama until they squeeze the Stanley in behind one bracket (the initial bracket on the left is on another layer) and they added 'unham' and Obama to the 'D' and presto, there's your 'mother'. But what we really should be looking for is Ann S who has a surname commencing with 'D'. But that's just far too complicated.
Thanks for the link. I had forgotten about that thread. Lots of good info in the opening article, & in the thread itself—some of the latter supplied by Smokeyblue. Good to reread the bit about the CCP’s findings & Seattle. More back-up evidence that agrees w Corsi’s findings. Nice to know.
I really must thank you for continuously drawing attention to the opinion/theory our group has come to, that the Dunham girl wasn’t his mother, it’s a refrain that echoes right through every document and article we see. However, how you come to the conclusion you know who his mother is/was, beats me and always has. All you ever saw was a family tree (I think) of the baby-sitters family and a link to a video with a title that included Val and Mal, which is on the DRJP Youtube channel. You’ve connected this to a request published by the baby-sitter’s brother-in-law in 2004 for assistance to find a relative named Valerie of whom he said he had lost track, she was apparently living in France and he didn’t have her address. Does DrRJP (we think he’s actually Polarik) think he’s identified a potential mother? Probably he does. You saw her name on a thread I think, where she was identified as an actress who had a part in The Avengers. And you’ve been jumping up and down like a jack-in-the-box about it ever since. I don’t really know what to call what you are doing, I’ll let others decide what your motives might be, personally, I simply find it tiresome.
Just wondering about motive and opportunity....
Would there have been someone altering Washington records in the late eighties and early nineties? Was someone using valid University credentials with an eye to the future who might have changed a few names, dates and numbers at the University, as well as having access to Public Libraries, newspaper morgues, microfiche, City and State records, etc.?
Also, it's only a relatively short hop from Seattle to Honolulu if the same person one wanted to alter Hawaiian records. All under the guise of "research", don'cha know. No one is going to continually monitor one lone researcher, doing seemingly boring searches through hundreds of pages of records.
*If* this happened, it took a lot of time, planning and background work to achieve their goal, to further their "cause".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.