Obviously I have removed all identifying information from this scan.
Posted on 08/03/2009 9:54:54 PM PDT by FTJM
Certificate taken down and information inserted into family tree with link to article:
"10d I0543 David Jeffrey Bomford, b 10 April 1959 at Adelaide, m 28 Nov 1981 at Somerton Park, South Australia I0546 Amanda Jane Sandover, b 1959, and had issue [an image of David's birth certificate has been removed from the website temporarily as at 4 August 2009 as the site has a limited download capacity. See http://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-the-source-of-the-forged-kenyan-birth-certificate]"
That may very well be, but as I said here either someone set up Orly (she fell for it) or the Aussie BC is a fake. The genealogy website is way too convenient and suspicious.
Found this at politjab on a message board..
Incidentally, Ed and Hummingbird are saying that the fake Kenyan document was rumored to have been produced by somebody at PJ. Ed is saying that WND is no better than the
Edit: World Sleaze DailyMain Sleaze Media
. The Constitutional scholar, Ken, is saying that the two citizen parents Constitutional question will probably never be heard by a court. They seem sort of down for some reason. Ed has sent Orly a message breaking the bad news to her. Dunbar says her case before Judge Carter never depended on the fake Kenyan document.
I think Ducky did it again.
Didn't see it, even though I fetched the original image a number of times after Technical Editor first found it and thus conclusively debunked the certificate.
In any case, I just took a look at the link you provided in your original post, and it seemed like a straight-forward explanation of the facts available at the time. I didn't look at the rest of the site, so I can't opine if it's "biased".
If the Bomford site really was hacked to link to the Washington Independent, then you'd have hot story. But of course, you'd have to document it. Saying it happened isn't good enough.
Some troll from politijab took credit for it but another rumor is that someone named Hanen from Awakening radio is taking credit.
Domain Name.......... bomford.net Creation Date........ 2005-02-08 Registration Date.... 2005-02-08 Expiry Date.......... 2010-02-08 Organisation Name.... Richard Bomford Organisation Address. 25 Berrigan Crescent Organisation Address. Organisation Address. OConnor Organisation Address. 2602 Organisation Address. ACT Organisation Address. AUSTRALIA Admin Name........... Richard Bomford Admin Address........ 25 Berrigan Crescent Admin Address........ Admin Address........ OConnor Admin Address........ 2602 Admin Address........ ACT Admin Address........ AUSTRALIA Admin Email.......... web1manager@bomford.net Admin Phone.......... +61.262477959 Admin Fax............ Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact Tech Address......... 701 First Ave. Tech Address......... Tech Address......... Sunnyvale Tech Address......... 94089 Tech Address......... CA Tech Address......... UNITED STATES Tech Email........... domain.tech@yahoo-inc.com Tech Phone........... +1.6198813096 Tech Fax............. Name Server.......... ns1.serverlinks.net Name Server.......... ns2.serverlinks.net
I leave it to you to come up with a case to make to them why they should investigate how the Washington Independent hacked them. Something about making history, perhaps? You have to realize, they're just trying to have some family memorabilia hosted online. They don't need Obama. They don't need the Birfers. They're down under in OZ! I suspect you'll need to make a case to interest them in helping you.
In any case, I just took a look at the link you provided in your original post, and it seemed like a straight-forward explanation of the facts available at the time. I didn't look at the rest of the site, so I can't opine if it's "biased".
If the Bomford site really was hacked to link to the Washington Independent, then you'd have hot story. But of course, you'd have to document it. Saying it happened isn't good enough.
Didn't see it? The link is clearly listed in the body of the posted thread. If you're not even going to read the thread or the linked site, you should refrain from commenting. FYI, I never said it "happened". I said it was strange and asked a question. READ THE THREAD.
I never said that the Washington Independent hacked anyone. You didn't read the thread, thoroughly look at the linked site, or understand my comments yet you commented on it as some internet expert. You can't be this daft.
ROFL! That poor guy! LOL that likely came out of nowhere, 5 thousand hits or something LMAO
I don’t blame him, besides there are LOTS of copies all over the place now! LOL
Talk about surprises... I bet he got his socks knocked off! LOL
Hey guys, watch this video if you are feeling a little deflated with all of this.. its really great, done by a high school kid, AMAZING It will make you feel better!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2307723/posts
OK, so to what "biased" site was I supposed to have been redirected while visiting the Bamford site? Which I did do, a number of times before it shut down, all without being redirected, much less to a "biased" site.
And, based on the Washington Independent link in your original post, the motivation to hack the site on their behalf by them or anyone else is minimal. So, you obviously got confused and jumped to an unwarranted conclusion.
And, based on the Washington Independent link in your original post, the motivation to hack the site on their behalf by them or anyone else is minimal. So, you obviously got confused and jumped to an unwarranted conclusion.
Yawn. I said the Washington Independent was a biased site which was linked to. The link to that site, which I included in the body of the OP of this thread, is fully functional. I did not say that the Washington Independent hacked the genealogy website.
Your second paragraph makes zero sense.
Unless you can show bomford.net was hacked, you have nothing but a commonplace observation.
Unless you can show bomford.net was hacked, you have nothing but a commonplace observation.
Like I said, the site was modified by someone before it was shut down. You claim that the ISP managers made the modification, which makes no sense. You didn't read the thread or understand my comments. However, I said it was STRANGE, drew no further conclusion and asked a question. At this point, your blindingly obvious opinion means very little.
I never said the ISP managers did anything but let their software work. When enough Freepers had downloaded that BC, the software said, "Tilt! Bandwidth Exceeeded!".
The next move is up to the domain owners, assuming they're remotely aware their family site is offline, much less why.
As for "biased" sites and all that, the burden of proof is on you. And having a site shut down by automatic software action doesn't help. You'll have to convince them (the Bomfords and their ISP) to assist in making your history-making case! If it's really true, their logs will be full of evidence.
God bless you, Mr. Bomford.
Please accept this apology, on behalf of America, for the disturbance.
The next move is up to the domain owners, assuming they're remotely aware their family site is offline, much less why.
As for "biased" sites and all that, the burden of proof is on you. And having a site shut down by automatic software action doesn't help. You'll have to convince them (the Bomfords and their ISP) to assist in making your history-making case! If it's really true, their logs will be full of evidence.
For clarity, you implied that the ISP managers made the modifications then clarified yourself, then you said that the ISP managers would not have contacted the domain (site) owners but now you say the domain owners might have known, even though they allegedly haven't changed the site in 2+ years. Wow. The site was modified before it was shut down. You have no idea who did it and keep changing your story.
There is no burden of proof on me regarding the Wash Ind site. I provided the link, yet you wouldn't even look at the entire site. You're batting a thousand buddy.
Obviously I have removed all identifying information from this scan.
“The Kenyan birth certificate is without question, 100% authentic.”
I hope this is true... I just had chills run from the back of my neck down my spine... goosebumps and all...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.