The Regeneration Project
and the Interfaith Power and Light campaign
"A religious response to global warming"
Donate and feel "very happy"
Posted on 08/04/2009 10:53:58 AM PDT by ClimateDepot.com
'Consensus' Takes Another Hit! More than 60 German Scientists Dissent Over Global Warming Claims! Call Climate Fears 'Pseudo 'Religion'; Urge Chancellor to 'reconsider' views
'Growing body of evidence shows anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role'
Tuesday, August 04, 2009 - By Marc Morano – Climate Depot More than 60 prominent German scientists have publicly declared their dissent from man-made global warming fears in an Open Letter to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The more than 60 signers of the letter include several United Nations IPCC scientists.
The scientists declared that global warming has become a “pseudo religion” and they noted that rising CO2 has “had no measurable effect” on temperatures. The German scientists, also wrote that the “UN IPCC has lost its scientific credibility.”
This latest development comes on the heels of a series of inconvenient developments for the promoters of man-made global warming fears, including new peer-reviewed studies, real world data, a growing chorus of scientists dissenting (including more UN IPCC scientists), open revolts in scientific societies and the Earth's failure to warm. In addition, public opinion continues to turn against climate fear promotion. (See "Related Links" at bottom of this article for more inconvenient scientific developments.)
The July 26, 2009 German scientist letter urged Chancellor Merkel to “strongly reconsider” her position on global warming and requested a “convening of an impartial panel” that is “free of ideology” to counter the UN IPCC and review the latest climate science developments.
The scientists, from many disciplines, including physicists, meteorology, chemistry, and geology, explain that “humans have had no measurable effect on global warming through CO2 emissions. Instead the temperature fluctuations have been within normal ranges and are due to natural cycles.”
“More importantly, there's a growing body of evidence showing anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role,” the scientists wrote. “Indeed CO2's capability to absorb radiation is already exhausted by today's atmospheric concentrations. If CO2 did indeed have an effect and all fossil fuels were burned, then additional warming over the long term would in fact remain limited to only a few tenths of a degree,” they added.
“The IPCC had to have been aware of this fact, but completely ignored it during its studies of 160 years of temperature measurements and 150 years of determined CO2 levels. As a result the IPCC has lost its scientific credibility,” the scientists wrote.
“Indeed the atmosphere has not warmed since 1998 – more than 10 years, and the global temperature has even dropped significantly since 2003. Not one of the many extremely expensive climate models predicted this. According to the IPCC, it was supposed to have gotten steadily warmer, but just the opposite has occurred,” the scientists wrote.
“The belief of climate change, and that it is manmade, has become a pseudo-religion,” the scientists wrote. “The German media has sadly taken a leading position in refusing to publicize views that are critical of anthropogenic global warming,” they added.
“Do you not believe, Madam Chancellor, that science entails more than just confirming a hypothesis, but also involves testing to see if the opposite better explains reality? We strongly urge you to reconsider your position on this subject and to convene an impartial panel for the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, one that is free of ideology, and where controversial arguments can be openly debated. We the undersigned would very much like to offer support in this regard.
Full Text of Translated Letter By 61 German Scientists: (emphasis added)
Open Letter – Climate Change
Bundeskanzleramt
Frau Bundeskanzerlin Dr. Angela Merkel
Willy-Brandt-Strabe 1
10557 Berlin
#
Vizerprasident Dipl. Ing. Michael Limburg 14476 Grob Glienicke Richard-Wagner-Str. 5a
E-mail: limburg@grafik-system.de
Grob Glienicke 26.07.09
To the attention of the Honorable Madam Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany
When one studies history, one learns that the development of societies is often determined by a zeitgeist, which at times had detrimental or even horrific results for humanity. History tells us time and again that political leaders often have made poor decisions because they followed the advice of advisors who were incompetent or ideologues and failed to recognize it in time. Moreover evolution also shows that natural development took a wide variety of paths with most of them leading to dead ends. No era is immune from repeating the mistakes of the past.
Politicians often launch their careers using a topic that allows them to stand out. Earlier as Minister of the Environment you legitimately did this as well by assigning a high priority to climate change. But in doing so you committed an error that has since led to much damage, something that should have never happened, especially given the fact you are a physicist. You confirmed that climate change is caused by human activity and have made it a primary objective to implement expensive strategies to reduce the so-called greenhouse gas CO2. You have done so without first having a real discussion to check whether early temperature measurements and a host of other climate related facts even justify it.
A real comprehensive study, whose value would have been absolutely essential, would have shown, even before the IPCC was founded, that humans have had no measurable effect on global warming through CO2 emissions. Instead the temperature fluctuations have been within normal ranges and are due to natural cycles. Indeed the atmosphere has not warmed since 1998 – more than 10 years, and the global temperature has even dropped significantly since 2003.
Not one of the many extremely expensive climate models predicted this. According to the IPCC, it was supposed to have gotten steadily warmer, but just the opposite has occurred.
More importantly, there's a growing body of evidence showing anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role. Indeed CO2's capability to absorb radiation is already exhausted by today's atmospheric concentrations. If CO2 did indeed have an effect and all fossil fuels were burned, then additional warming over the long term would in fact remain limited to only a few tenths of a degree.
The IPCC had to have been aware of this fact, but completely ignored it during its studies of 160 years of temperature measurements and 150 years of determined CO2 levels. As a result the IPCC has lost its scientific credibility. The main points on this subject are included in the accompanying addendum.
In the meantime, the belief of climate change, and that it is manmade, has become a pseudo-religion. Its proponents, without thought, pillory independent and fact-based analysts and experts, many of whom are the best and brightest of the international scientific community. Fortunately in the internet it is possible to find numerous scientific works that show in detail there is no anthropogenic CO2 caused climate change. If it was not for the internet, climate realists would hardly be able to make their voices heard. Rarely do their critical views get published.
The German media has sadly taken a leading position in refusing to publicize views that are critical of anthropogenic global warming. For example, at the second International Climate Realist Conference on Climate in New York last March, approximately 800 leading scientists attended, some of whom are among the world's best climatologists or specialists in related fields. While the US media and only the Wiener Zeitung (Vienna daily) covered the event, here in Germany the press, public television and radio shut it out. It is indeed unfortunate how our media have developed - under earlier dictatorships the media were told what was not worth reporting. But today they know it without getting instructions.
Do you not believe, Madam Chancellor, that science entails more than just confirming a hypothesis, but also involves testing to see if the opposite better explains reality? We strongly urge you to reconsider your position on this subject and to convene an impartial panel for the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, one that is free of ideology, and where controversial arguments can be openly debated. We the undersigned would very much like to offer support in this regard.
Respectfully yours,
Prof. Dr.rer.nat. Friedrich-Karl Ewert EIKE
Diplom-Geologe
Universität. - GH - Paderborn, Abt. Höxter (ret.)
#
Dr. Holger Thuß
EIKE President
European Institute for Climate and Energy
http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/
Signed by
Look for the MSM to call these Germans “Nazi Sympathizers”.
Ja!
parsy.
I think you’ve got the wrong source link
This is where I found it.
yes, thank you! My mistake. The correct source link is:
Sounds warm (very warm) to me, too.
Algore was onto something, but not the way he was thinking.
Doncha just hate those pesky details.
ping
Now let us see if the SRM say anything. I already know the answer to this one!! Somebody should send this to the Repubs in the senate.
And the wheels better continue to fall off because the Senate will be voting on the cap and trade bill in September or whenever they can sneak it in.
While health care legislation is the current hot topic we cannot take our eyes off of cap and trade - its passage will raise prices and costs and destroy businesses and jobs.
>> “.......and the Earth’s failure to warm.”
Doncha just hate those pesky details. <<
It is not the pesky details that hurt you, it is the real inconvenient truths that emerge about their inconvenient lies.
Good for them; I am afraid they will be ignored, however. The global warming theory is a convenient untruth for too many people.
mark
I agree! It would do serious damage to the economy and change the climate only as much as King Canute managed to change the ocean.
In doing some research on another thread, what do you think happens when CO2 absorbs energy? The natural assumption is that the C02 becomes warmer but that is not true.
Neils Bohr in the early 1900’s showed that gas molecules do NOT become warmer but the electrons are moved to a higher energy level. Eventually when the molecule can absorb no more energy it is released again as radiated energy. Common sense would tell you that half would be radiated to space and half to earth. It is NOT 100% reflected back to earth.
Another point is the use of the word green house gas. The reason a green house becomes warm is because of the physical barrier of the glass. CO2 in the atmosphere is not a physical barrier. The analogy of a greenhouse is false and misleading.
Bravo to all scientists that place reality over politics.
Now we have a culture of people who worship the earth.
While I appreciate God's jealousy in these matters, right now I live on this earth and I really wish that people would stop worshiping it.
It makes me kinda nervous.
Self-ping
bookmark
Gore will have these heretics shot at dawn.
Makes me nervous, too.
And when they acted toward Herod Agrippa like he was some god, and he accepted the adulation, God bypassed Herod’s secret service detail with some worms.
Messianic public speakers should beware of fish bait, if you get my drift.
Or NemoTodt to create a greek/german dead worms and fishes pun.
I thought Dingy Harry planned to sneak it in as part of the healthcare bill. Can't remember who reported that.
Tea Party people and Town Hall leaders should have handouts of stories like this and from Australia where they too have given up the Climate Change science. It is improtant to have facts not opinions at these town hall events. Then ask the congress person or their spokeman how can they vote on Cap and Trade given this data???
Every time I speak to a committed globalonist about global warming, they end up spouting about capitalism.
Chust wunderbar. Der Holsteiners nicht to blame from piling up der gassy poopies, und zo der vhipped cream und sausage supplies bin safe from der EU Katzenjammerischer interference. Ja Ja.
“And when they acted toward Herod Agrippa like he was some god, and he accepted the adulation”
K worships the ground I walk on and brings me burnt offerings for supper every night.
And I’ll bet in your case there are times she believes in the death sentence.
“And I’ll bet in your case there are times she believes in the death sentence.”
No, but I learned early on to accept the offerings with fear and trembling.........and dish washing........and cooking lessons.
Who are these deniers, these heretics, these pooh poohers of scientific consensus? Scientists or something? Uh...what...they are scientists??!!?? Well, never mind.
Thanks BIGLOOK.
Rise of the Natural Climate Cycle Deniers
drroyspencer.com | 7/29/2009 | Roy Spencer
Posted on 08/04/2009 1:05:40 PM PDT by Bobkk47
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2308149/posts
This is what people need to use to convince their neighbors and friends and relatives and so on...
It’s one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but it’s quite *another* to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...
THEREFORE..., it’s also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply *one* video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the *one*...
The following is an *excellent* video documentary on the so-called “Global Warming” I would recommend it to all FReepers. It’s a very well-made documentary.
“The Great Global Warming Swindle”
If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link.
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[this is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size...]
It’s worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.
Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course...]
Buy it here...
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE
[this one would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...]
—
Also, in split parts on YouTube...
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMA6sszChwQ
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERisgJ3QWjk
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HLVYwmZoxc
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr-AG3BA1Go
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbllTsBHuxk
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyK7C1OrAAo
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrIX8LcAuMQ
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-ZmCDOZbtM
Thanks for the ping.
Great stuff!
Correct.
The glass keeps thermal gas motion from moving outside the boundary, thus increasing warming by holding energy inside.
I would guess that without the glass barrier, gasses warmed are free to move and take temperature energy to areas of lower temperature, eventually moving to areas of the atmosphere where radiation can more readily emit back into space.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
