Skip to comments.Does "King of the World" Need a Birth Certificate?
Posted on 08/05/2009 9:00:11 AM PDT by jazminerose
Since his arrival at the White House, Barack Obama has been touted as `King of the World rather than USA president.
As King of the World, does Obama really need born-in-USA status? On the occasion of their presidents 48th birthday yesterday, Americans still dont know for certain from whence he came, only where he is leading them.
There was a mammoth picture of the Birthday Boy on display outside the White House, but no pictures of him pursing his lips to blow out the candles on a birthday cake, which may have served as a reminder that this is a president already well on his way to blowing out the lights of the Free World.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I am starting to think Obama was born in one of those 57 states.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
I can only think of one state: The state of dishonor
THE SIMPLE FACT REMAINS THAT NO ONE KNOWS IF OBAMA IS CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT.
This is not a unreasonable thing to ask for since being a "natural born citizen" of the US is a constitutional requirement for the job of President. It's not hateful, and it's not racist.
Proving that you are should be an honor.
Yet Obama cannot and will not produce either. Why?
The following document is a Certified Copy of Registration of Birth, puporting to be from Kenya. It has gotten a lot of press. It has a number of issues which means, IMHO, that in all probability that it is not authentic. Yet, it looks more authentic than the electronic Certificate of Live Birth (COLB, not the long form Birth Certificate which has never been offered) that the Obama administration has shown on their web site.
The point is, this supposed document is out there and is being analyzed to death and will ultimately be certified one way or the other by experts. Obama's long form birth certificate is not...it is getting no such review. The longer it is absent, the more insistent the demands will be for it to be made public.
A number of military Officers are now suing for Obama to prove and show his "bonafides" before deploying, because for them, it becomes a life or death issue to follow their Commander in Chief. The same applies in principle to all citizens. In the end, Obama will not be able to forever hide from proving the constitutional qualification.
This “King of the world” junk makes me sick and diplomatic immunity is just plain stupid.
State of dishonor.
And disgrace, stupor (his media), denial, arrogance, confusion (foreign policy)
Hey barry, whatcha hidin?
Do Muslims celebrate birthdays?
I have a copy of my birth certificate , the “original” on file with the Bureau of Vital Staistics. And I know it is a fiction. The name of my adoptive mother appears on the form, and since my adoption degree has yet to be found, the State does not know who my natural mother is. I do, of course. Because of the nature of inheritance laws in my state and the old need for secrecy in adoptions, I suspect that the same is true of many, many people in my state. So I look at what the State of Hawaii has put out and say: So what? May be right, or it may also be a fiction.
This is so simple; I wonder why no one thought of this before . . .
While having little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi?
How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York, Jakarta, and Karachi, what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities: he traveled with a U.S. passport, a British passport, or with an Indonesian passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America - as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress - the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. Count me in as one of those inquiring minds who'd at least like to know the answers to these easily answered (by Obama) questions.
By who? Nobody I know.
At this point, I think we would find Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport of interest as well. Why is no one chasing that?
“As King of the World, does Obama really need born-in-USA status?”
King of the world?
I’d say Bammy’s more like “King” of the chumps!