This is a strawman. How can anyone defend a strawman argument of **your** creation?
Pale,...Using strawmen arguments might work in a private conversation. You might even frustrate your Constitution defending debating partner to the point that he might walk away. You might falsely believe that you “won” the debate.
Ah! But...This is the Internet. That doesn't work here. Your words, and your strawmen arguments, stand for all to see and judge.
Their certainly seems to be a very strong “native son” component to the coverage he’s gotten, and in my experience those in HI I’ve talked to are a bit “laid back” about that whole “issue a definitive statement and tell the whole truth” thing.
And, I’ve been trying for a couple weeks to get the Hawaiian governor’s office to confirm that she never verified he was born there, without any luck. I’ve sent three emails and left two voice mail messages.
Since I don’t have all day for this, it would be great if others could try to get someone on the phone about this:
Now, that doesn’t mean an organized conspiracy, but I haven’t seen anyone in HI who’s an Obama opponent such as Palin has in AK.
Not "is" but "could be." It wouldn't take the entire state government to pull something like this off, hypothetically.
When you factor in the collusion of the media and Dim partisans on this,the sequestering of other relevant documents--law school journal articles, scholarly articles and dissertations mainly==and moderates' fear of humiliation, at the very least it's a possibility.
I'll go away once they disprove my assumptions by releasing all relevant docs in just one of these categories.