Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Codex Threatens Health of Billions
Natural News ^ | 7/30/2009 | Barbara Minton, Editor

Posted on 08/06/2009 8:20:56 PM PDT by ex-Texan

Your right to eat healthy food and use supplements of your choice is rapidly vanishing, but every effort has been made to keep you in the dark about the coming nutricide.

Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on December 31, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream media about this threat to humanity.

Yet, according to the projections based on figures from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin and mineral guideline alone.

Former Nazi is father of contemporary Codex

Codex is the enemy of everyone except those who will profit from it. Codex has an association with those who committed crimes during the Nazi regime. At the end of World War II, the Nuremberg tribunal judged Nazis who had committed horrendous crimes against humanity and sentenced them to prison terms. One of those found guilty was the president of the megalithic corporation I.G. Farben, Hermann Schmitz. His company was the largest chemical manufacturing enterprise in the world, and had extraordinary political and economic power and influence with the Hitlerian Nazi state. Farben produced the gas used in the Nazi gas chambers, and the steel for the railroads built to transport people to their deaths.

While serving his prison term, Schmitz looked for an alternative to brute force for controlling people and realized that people could be controlled through their food supply. When he got out of prison, he went to his friends at the United Nations (UN) and laid out a plan to take over the control of food worldwide. A trade commission called Codex Alimentarius (Latin for food code) was re-created under the guise of it being a consumer protection commission. But Codex was never in the business of protecting people. It has always been about money and profits at the expense of people.

In 1962, the timetable was set for Codex to be fully implemented on a global level by December 31, 2009. Under Codex, committees were established to create guidelines on such topics as fish and fisheries, fats and oils, fruits and vegetables, ground nuts, nutrition, food for specialized uses, and vitamins and minerals. There were 27 committees in all, creating a huge bureaucracy. Under Codex there are over 4,000 guidelines and regulations on everything that can be put into your mouth with the exception of pharmaceuticals which are not regulated by Codex.

Codex is a weapon being used to reduce the level of nutrition worldwide

Codex is an industry dominated regulation setting organization, and as such has no legal standing. Participation in Codex is said to be voluntary. But Codex has risen to the level of de facto legal standing because Codex is administered by the WHO and FAO. They fund it and run it at the request of the UN. Since the WHO and FAO are supposed to be about health, there is conflict of interest. The committees of Codex work up guidelines, rules and regulations, and present them to a Codex commission for ratification. Once they are ratified and approved by consensus, they become mandatory standards for any country that is a member of the WHO.

Codex was accepted when the WTO was formed in 1994 as a means of harmonizing food standards globally for easy trade between countries. As a result, countries must harmonize with Codex if they want to have any standing in a trade dispute. When disputes arise and countries are pulled in to WTO, the one that is Codex compliant automatically wins, regardless of the merits of its case.

Codex has become a weapon to make every nation scurry to become compliant to its mandated decline in nutritional standards. Compliance in the U.S. will mark the end of its consumer protection laws. Codex will not serve consumers. Codex will serve the interests of the medical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, chemical, and big agricultural industries.

Under Codex, nutrients are classified as poisons

The Dietary Substances Health and Education Act (DSHEA), was signed into law in 1994 for the purpose of ensuring that safe and appropriately labeled products would remain available to those who wanted to use them. In the findings associated with this law, Congress stated that there may be a positive relationship between sound dietary practice and good health, and a connection between dietary supplement use, reduced health-care expenses, and disease prevention. Under DSHEA, nutrients and herbs are classified as food. There is no upper limit set, and access is freely given. Americans are allowed to have any nutrients they want, because under English common law, anything that is not expressly forbidden is permitted.

Codex, on the other hand, is based on Napoleonic law and is much more restrictive. In 1994, the same year DSHEA was signed, Codex had nutrients declared to be toxic and poisonous. And as poisons, they claimed people must be protected from them through the use of toxicology and risk assessment, under which scientists test small doses on animals until they are able to discern an impact. They then take the first sign of the most minimal impact and divide this amount by 100 to establish a safety margin required from these poisons. This means that the largest dose of any nutrient allowed under Codex is 1/100th of the amount shown to produce the first discernable impact.

Nutrients allowed under Codex are limited to those on the positive list, expected to contain only 18 nutrients, one of them being fluoride. Although fluoride has no biological benefit whatsoever, it does make people complacent.

The Codex proponents now have several bills before Congress designed to overturn and get rid of DSHEA. Once this is accomplished, the U.S. will have been harmonized with the vitamin and mineral guidelines of codex. High potency, therapeutically effective, significant nutrients will then be illegal in the way that heroin is illegal. They will not even be available by prescription.

Codex supports toxic food additives, pesticides and GM foods

Codex poses a significant threat to the food supply, according to Dr. Robert Verkerk, founder and director of the Alliance for Natural Health. About 300 dangerous food additives that are mainly synthetic will be allowed under Codex, including aspartame, BHA, BHT, potassium bromate, tartrazine, and more. Dr. Verkerk is particularly concerned that no consideration has been given to potential risks associated with long-term exposure to mixtures of additives.

Codex sets limits for the dangerous industrial chemicals that can be used in food, but they are incredibly high, and the list of chemicals that can be used is long. In 2001, 176 countries including the U.S. got together and decided that 12 highly toxic organic chemicals, known as persistent organic pollutants (POPS), were so bad that they had to be banned. There are many more than 12 toxic chemicals used on food, but these 12 were unanimously declared to be the worst. Of these, 9 are pesticides.

Under Codex, 7 of the 9 forbidden POPS will again be allowed in the production of food. All together, Codex allows over 3,275 different pesticides, including those that are suspected carcinogens or endocrine disrupters. There is no consideration of the long-term effects of exposure to mixtures of pesticide residues in food.

Organic food governance will be dumbed down to suit the interests of large food producers. Various synthetic chemical additives and processing aids will be allowed, and food labeled as organic may be irradiated. Labeling will permit the use of hidden, non-organic ingredients.

Monsanto, a member of Codex, will benefit greatly as production of genetically modified (GM) foods are stepped up and more GM plants are given the green light. Terminator seeds will be approved for international trade. GM food animals will also be on the way.

Under Codex, every dairy animal can be treated with growth hormone, and all animals in the food chain will be treated with sub-clinical levels of antibiotics. Codex will lead to the required irradiation of all foods with the exception of those grown locally and sold raw.

Codex is food regulations that are in fact the legalization of mandated toxicity and under-nutrition. Of the 3 billion people initially expected to die as the result of the Codex vitamin and mineral guidelines, 2 billion of them will die from the preventable diseases that result from under-nutrition, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and many others. Those who will live will be the wealthy elites who are able to somehow provide themselves with sources of clean food and other nutrients.

Codex is legalized genocide

Dr. Gregory Damato, Ph.D., writing for Natural News, has characterized Codex as "population control for money". He sees Codex as run by the U.S. and controlled by the big pharmaceutical corporations and the likes of Monsanto with the purpose of reducing the population of the world to a level considered sustainable by those promulgating the New World Order. This would mean a reduction of approximately 93 percent of the current world population.

Once Codex standards are adopted there will be no turning back. When Codex compliance is instigated in any area, as long as the country remains a member of the WTO, those standards cannot be repealed, or altered in any way.

The time for modifying Codex guidelines is rapidly disappearing

Some hope remains. Over the years, the WTO has accepted Codex standards as presumptive evidence of the rules of trade between countries. However, several times in history, the WTO has refused to make Codex the single and only standard to be used in trade disputes. Under Codex`s own statutes, their guidelines are claimed to be "advisory", and nations are able to set up their own guidelines as long as they are more restrictive than those of Codex.

Since compliance with Codex standards is simply presumptive evidence, and not finally determinative, a nation can opt out of the guidelines in an effort to protect its traditional foods and remedies. The Codex two step process is a legal strategy developed to help nations wanting to do this. Under step one, the country develops its own food and health guidelines that may be at variance with Codex guidelines. For example, it may be much stricter on the issues of toxins in the food supply or on the issue of genetically modified foods. It may require, for example, that companies using GM ingredients be required to indicate them on food labels. In countries that refuse to use GM foods, this can be indicated on their label too, so that people can make informed choices. The second step is to adopt a national law that implements those guidelines on a sound scientific basis.

Normally, in a trade dispute before the WTO, the country that has adopted Codex guidelines will be the winner of that dispute based on those guidelines being presumptive evidence. However, when countries have gone through the two step process to create their own guidelines, there is no such presumption, and the WTO will look at the science behind the guidelines.

In the U.S. the door is open to Codex

In 1995, the FDA issued a policy statement saying that international standards such as Codex would supersede U.S. laws governing all food. Under the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which is illegal under current U.S. law, but is legal under international law, the U.S. is required to conform to Codex as it stands on December 31, 2009, unless it creates its own guidelines and gets them approved under the two step process. Given current government sentiment, this seems unlikely. Besides, as guidelines are one-by-one chiseled into standards, time is running out.

For more information:

TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; agriculture; bho; bho44; bhoagriculture; bhotyranny; codex; codexalimentarius; congress; conspiracytheory; cwii; cwiiping; democratcongress; democrats; economy; food; foodsafety; foodsafetyact; gardening; hr2749; liberalfascism; lping; monsanto; nazis; obama; obamadictatorship; pelosi; plantationhealthcare; preppers; socialism; sourcetitlenoturl; totalitarian; waxman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last
Obama's most infamous legislation was labeled with misleading title of The Food Safety Act. The CODEX requirements mandated by the UN were embodied into HR 2749. This legislation passed in July, 2009.

The father of the act was Henry Waxman and the mother was Nasty Pelosi. The act was powered by millions in campaign contributions from Monsanto Corporation. In other words, the act reeks of bribery and corruption.

I urge you to do your own research on HR 2749. Among other things, it outlaws all natural and organic food. It mandates food crops grown in the U.S. to be grown in a 'sterile environment' free of everything but Monsanto's genetically modified seeds. The act reeks of totalitarian control of all American food production. It will also outlaw all organic and natural food stores in the U.S. In the state of Oregon, this was the only bright spot in our recession-raped economy. Passage of the act will throw thousands more out of work.

Basic Google Search for HR 2749

Time is very short: The act will go to the U.S. Senate immediately after the August recess !

You know what to do in the meantime. If you do not take action right away, Obama has promised to sign the act into law immediately.

1 posted on 08/06/2009 8:20:56 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; M. Espinola; FromLori; Liz; stephenjohnbanker; GOPJ; Travis McGee; TigerLikesRooster; ...
*PING* !
2 posted on 08/06/2009 8:24:34 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Dang, sounds like science fiction novel.

3 posted on 08/06/2009 8:30:30 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

i like cheese

4 posted on 08/06/2009 8:31:53 PM PDT by Redcloak ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


5 posted on 08/06/2009 8:31:54 PM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Obama is a fictional president. What else do you expect ___ ?

6 posted on 08/06/2009 8:32:57 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Paranoid much?

7 posted on 08/06/2009 8:35:16 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Please go take your meds. Now.

8 posted on 08/06/2009 8:48:09 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Vote for a short Freepathon! Donate now if you possibly can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I am not paranoid. I am truthful. Do your own research.

You only have until September, 2009 to act . . .

Recall back in 2004 and 2005 when I was warning everybody about hyper-inflated real estate: I was viciously attacked by 'freepers' in the pay of mortgage companies, and mortgage brokers, bankers and shills getting paid by NY banks. Over 200 hacking attack per day were directed at me from corporate offices.

Check my freeper page if your memory is faulty . . .

Eventually, I was proven 100% correct. My predictions that said real estate was wildly inflated were true. Houses valued at $ 1.5 Million in Los Angeles fell down to $ 750k. And even lower. Prices are still falling. The foreclosure crisis is just heating up. It will get worse for another three years.

I come again in good faith to warn people. The trolls again come out to throw verbal bricks and insults. You actually believe the toxic spin of Obama and Nasty Pelosi _____________ ?

So be it . . .

9 posted on 08/06/2009 8:50:44 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

10 posted on 08/06/2009 8:51:17 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
“of Monsanto with the purpose of reducing the population of the world to a level considered sustainable by those promulgating the New World Order. This would mean a reduction of approximately 93 percent of the current world population.”

Now why would Monsanto want to get rid of 93% of the world's population?
The demand for RoundUp Ready corn and soybeans would take a big hit.

11 posted on 08/06/2009 8:54:35 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I agree with Rick..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If people let government decide what foods they eat
and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon
be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who
live under tyranny.

Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826)

12 posted on 08/06/2009 8:57:48 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Good post. I’ve been aware of codex for some time, have written my congressmen about it. It is rather daunting to consider this with cap and trade, health care, etc. Amounts to a bloodless coup.

13 posted on 08/06/2009 8:59:45 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (All Hail the Community Organizer in Chief of the Land of the Fee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand; Cindy; Just Lori; nw_arizona_granny; silent_jonny; SunkenCiv; ...

~~Madness is devouring our country .. PING!


14 posted on 08/06/2009 9:00:21 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Do you own research. You do Gooogle don't you ___________ ?

New World Order . . .

15 posted on 08/06/2009 9:00:47 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan


16 posted on 08/06/2009 9:04:35 PM PDT by The Californian (The door to the room of success swings on the hinges of opposition. Bob Jones, Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
Where do your seeds come from?

I can't express enough how important it is for those of us who are dedicated to food security, and the ongoing availability of good, local, organic produce, to do whatever we can to prevent Monsanto from colonizing our primary sources of seed. Toward that end, I'm also posting the list of companies owned by Monsanto for your review, in case you find others whose seeds you've bought.

17 posted on 08/06/2009 9:05:51 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Codex Threatens Health of Billions

(rolling eyes) So now it's unhealthy for women to use a popular feminine hygiene product? Sheesh.

18 posted on 08/06/2009 9:06:24 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Go sell crazy somewhere else; we're all stocked up here.

19 posted on 08/06/2009 9:09:24 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

I can see how that makes perfect sense . . . to somebody who believes that a law is about to be passed that “mandates food crops grown in the U.S. to be grown in a ‘sterile environment’ free of everything but Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds”. Me? I think I’ll wait to hear some loud howls from DuPont and Syngenta, the number 2 and 3 global seed purveyors, who would presumably have some very loud objections to the entire United States being decreed a Monsanto-only zone.

20 posted on 08/06/2009 9:10:10 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Vote for a short Freepathon! Donate now if you possibly can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson