Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jet lands Safely In L.A. After Tire Blows
AP Report ^ | August 06, 2009

Posted on 08/06/2009 9:52:43 PM PDT by Steelfish

Jet lands safely in L.A. after tire blows Incident occurred upon takeoff, FAA confirms nose gear failure

Aug 6, 2009

LOS ANGELES - A Federal Aviation Administration spokesman says an Alaska Airlines jet has landed safely at Los Angeles International Airport after a tire blew during takeoff.

FAA spokesman Ian Gregor says Flight 6 had just taken off for Washington National Airport on Thursday when the pilot reported a possible blown tire on the nose gear and declared an emergency.

The Boeing 737-800 landed without incident at 3:04 p.m.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aerospace; lax

1 posted on 08/06/2009 9:52:43 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Don’t these craft have run-flat tires?


2 posted on 08/06/2009 9:53:36 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Don’t these craft have run-flat tires?”

Sounds like it did run flat. ;-)

Seriously, there’s not a lot of gee-whiz protection when a tire is zipping along at ~170 mph. Consider that there’s a big difference between 65 mph (car speeds) and 170 mph (God help us airplane speeds). A failed tire, of any design, will disintegrate at the operational speeds we’re talking about.

Consider also where the nose tire fragments will be heading immediately after they come off the rim. That’s right! The engine intakes. There’s a bit of personal experience here. It is enough to point out that the mere loss of a tire is a lot less trouble than “shrapnelling” the aircraft and powerplants in the process of said disintegration.

Tires fail on rare occasions (very rare). But when they do, the induced complications can be .... interesting.


3 posted on 08/06/2009 10:44:44 PM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

The run-flat design contains a rigid disk attached to the wheel, inside the tire. When the tire loses air, the wheel runs on the disk.


4 posted on 08/06/2009 10:46:46 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Indeed, but I have never noted an implimentation of that technology on an airliner. As I said, I doubt that a tire incorporating run flat technology would fair any better (ie. retaining its structural integrity) than a conventional tire. The forces encountered at the speeds we’re talking about are tremendous and everything has to work properly.

As I said, the danger in a tire failure is not loss of pressure or even directional control (the flight surfaces increasingly control runway tracking as the aircraft approaches Vr). The concern is all about the damage that is going to be done to the airframe and powerplants when the rubber starts flying. Conventional or run-flat, a tire will come apart at Vr.


5 posted on 08/06/2009 10:59:38 PM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

Sorry. I should have said a BAD tire will come apart at Vr.


6 posted on 08/06/2009 11:02:05 PM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson