Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Birth Story Unraveling - Mother In Univ Class In Seattle 15 Days After Obama Supposedly Born!
Dr. Jerome Corsi / Rusty Humphries Show

Posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:49 PM PDT by MindBender26

Edited on 08/08/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Jerone Corsi, Ph. D. is about to drop another bombshell, casting further doubt on the stories of President Obama's birth.

Dr. Corsi, whose doctorate is from Harvard, is an excellent researcher and investigative journalist. He was the driving force behind the Swift Boat veterans telling the truth about War Phony John Kerry. He is also the author of "Obamanation."

In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.

We are expected to believe that in just15 days, she gave birth, stayed in the hospital for a few days, them packed her things and left her house in Hawaii, moved to Seattle, got established there, registered for, then began classed in Seattle, all the while caring for her newborn.

The new evidence also destroys another Obama legend-lie. According to the President’s autobiography, Obama Sr. and Durhan-Soetoro were supposedly deeply in love and made a happy home together in Hawaii, complete with their baby, until Obama Sr. had to move to Boston to attend Harvard and could not afford take Stanley and baby Barack with him.

According to Dr. Corsi’s new written evidence, Durham-Soetoro was in college classes, thousands of miles away from Hawaii and did not return to the islands until long Obama Sr. left for Harvard.

Dr. Corsi also reveals that a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth requires no proof of any kind and could simply be issued on the sworn statement of one parent.

All of this simply adds to the fast growing uncertainty and suspicion over Obama’s supposed birth stories. Is August 4, 1961, his real birth date? Where was he really born? When he traveled to the Middle East in the 1990s, he did not have a US passport. What country issued him a passport, and why? Why won’t he release the one document that would answer all the questions?

It just gets deeper and deeper.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1961not1962; article2section1; barackobama; barrysoetoro; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; corsi; dunhamnotdurham; impeachobama; kenya; naturalborn; obama; obamafamily; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; soetoro; stanleynotsydney; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400401-429 last
To: Fred Nerks

There’s no major contradiction in the use of those three names. UW would have her indexed under both names, since her HS and UH transcripts were under those names.

Her use of the name “Anna Obama” in phone records was probably aimed at avoiding her HS friends — remember, none of them were aware she was still in town until 1962, and the two she visited on Mercer Island in late August 1961 say they never knew she was attending UW back then.

As far as the racial real estate restrictions, it’s obvious that by 1961 that neighborhood was in decline, judging by how the house she was living in had been subdivided into apartments rented by college students. The restrictions might have been on the books, but it’s doubtful they were enforced. Besides, Stanley Ann was white. The landlord needn’t know, or care, what color the infant was, if he/she even knew there was a child living there. Landlords who rent to college students tend not to be very picky, as long as the rent is paid and the tenants don’t set the place on fire.


401 posted on 08/10/2009 5:03:58 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Where was he really born?

Maybe Seattle?

402 posted on 08/10/2009 5:11:42 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Who's your Long Legged MacDaddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

The moment I saw this unknown fool(obumo) have his ghost written book “The Audacity of a Dope” on the market, I new he was the left’s chosen one for (Disaster USA).

I agree, this was all side-stepped to allow for this marxist takeover. The reality, it is a battle between the haves and the have nots. Marxist elitist vs American Patrioits.

Our Senate and House have sold us out for thier on interests.

They should all be held accountable for the fraud perpetuated on the American People.

Molon Labe,


403 posted on 08/10/2009 5:43:14 AM PDT by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

April I believe that is when the “Worm Will Turn” for America.

Cowards in the house and senate sit back and do nothing for us Real Americans.

We need to vote in working Americans to the house and senate and preclude these wealthy silver spooned elitist.

Phrase of the day,”Let’s all go out and buy another gun to perturb another marxist liberal.”

Molon Labe,


404 posted on 08/10/2009 5:49:18 AM PDT by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Albertafriend
But I was watching a movie called “In This Our Life” starring the extremely popular actress Bette Davis. She was playing the role of Stanley Timberlake. And the movie came out in 1942, the year of our Stanley’s birth.

Excellent catch!

405 posted on 08/10/2009 5:59:48 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Maybe Seattle?

There is a great embedded answer in your reply/question.

When dealing with the President of the United States, there should be no questions about his eligibility.

In this case, there are serious questions.... and a refusal to provide answers.

406 posted on 08/10/2009 6:42:44 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Never Kick Leftists When They Are Down. Let Them Halfway Back Up. You Get Much Better Leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: dixiegrrlll79

IIRC, those same folks looked into John McCain’s files, as well.


407 posted on 08/10/2009 11:32:57 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
We are expected to believe that in just15 days, she gave birth, stayed in the hospital for a few days, them packed her things and left her house in Hawaii, moved to Seattle, got established there, registered for, then began classed in Seattle, all the while caring for her newborn.

It's a lot more plausible than packing up everything and traveling from Kenya to Seattle in the same amount of time.

408 posted on 08/10/2009 1:24:04 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nom d’ Guerre
Do WND editors not check WND’s articles for content errors?

No, of course not. Otherwise they wouldn't be stuck with egg on their face every other day. I'm amazed it took you this long to figure it out.

409 posted on 08/10/2009 1:27:51 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham was enrolled at the University of Washington for: Autumn 1961 Winter 1962 Spring 1962

Autumn quarter here starts in the last week of September. Bambi was born on August 4th. That gives mama Obama about a month and a half from the time of his birth to move to Seattle and attend classes.

I don't see why anyone would find that implausible.

410 posted on 08/10/2009 1:30:46 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
As far as the racial real estate restrictions, it’s obvious that by 1961 that neighborhood was in decline,

Yup. The old-timers I've talked to here tell me Capitol Hill was pretty much a mixed-race slum by the mid-1960's,

It didn't start to turn around until the 1980's.

411 posted on 08/10/2009 1:35:09 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
"There is absolutely no legal definition of "natural born citizen" the requires citizenship of the parents."

"Could be because, there is no legal defintion of "Natural Born Citizen"."

For the sake of argument lets say that's true. Then my point is valid. I was disputing a birther claim that two citizen parents are in fact required. That there is no such legal definition falsifies that claim.

412 posted on 08/10/2009 2:24:55 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Wonder if you ever got a reply on what this document might have been about?


413 posted on 08/10/2009 2:55:01 PM PDT by potlatch ( There is no education in the second kick of a mule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Some sort of agreement or memo signed in Moscow this last July 2009 by Hussy Junior and the Russkie President

Interesting as that is a copy of that document that was released to the media by the White House

It is not as if they do not have SpellCheck for wordprocessing forms and documents or enough staff to review and edit or correct rough drafts

The WH would not be so stupid as to just type and print and skip checking for errors on international documents could they?

Hmmmmmmm.....


414 posted on 08/10/2009 3:17:14 PM PDT by devolve (- - .....what would the IRA do with you and your facist thugs?..... - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Thank you. I didn’t see any replies on the threads so wondered.


415 posted on 08/10/2009 3:21:59 PM PDT by potlatch ( There is no education in the second kick of a mule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Not sure how to follow up on that document

Sure is strange.....


416 posted on 08/10/2009 4:33:53 PM PDT by devolve (- - .....what would the IRA do with you and your facist thugs?..... - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Maybe a lot of Googling?? ‘Obama signed Russian documents’, etc.
I remember someone writing you, “got a source for that, I need it”. “Thanks in advance”. LOL


417 posted on 08/10/2009 4:51:47 PM PDT by potlatch ( There is no education in the second kick of a mule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

I believe Meek may have written that to my

I may pass it on to a few who have some staff that can research it if it looks like something

Odd for Barack to be on that and for Barack to be on an alleged COLB

It is beyond my area


418 posted on 08/10/2009 5:24:16 PM PDT by devolve (- - .....what would the IRA do with you and your facist thugs?..... - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: devolve

I remember seeing talk about Barak being used before, even recently. Has to have been on the COLB threads.


419 posted on 08/10/2009 5:28:55 PM PDT by potlatch ( There is no education in the second kick of a mule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: mlo
For the sake of argument lets say that's true. Then my point is valid. I was disputing a birther claim that two citizen parents are in fact required. That there is no such legal definition falsifies that claim.

And none that supports it either. There is however considerable historical evidence supporting the "child of citizens" notion, and even some legal support, in Perkins vs. Elg 307, 307 U.S. 325 Ms. Elg was declared, by the DC circuit, to be a "natural born" citizen. This was supported by the Supreme Court, even though only her citizenship was at issue. Both her parents were naturalized citizens *at the time of her birth*, which was in the US. Of course that doesn't prove that if she'd only had one citizen parent, that they wouldn't have done the same. (I've not been able to find the DC Circuit's ruling, and am going on the citation to it in the Supreme Court's ruling, they may have expounded further on the matter)

One major historical support for the "child of citizens" requirement for natural born status comes from one of the authors of the 14th amendment.

I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen; but, sir, I may be allowed to say further, that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power or color of power to say that any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States, and not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States.”
John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, Architect of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, March 9, 1866.

This statement is documented in Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866), Cf. U.S. Const. XIVth Amend.

Notice that the first part says "of parents not owing allegience", while the second says "any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States, and not owing a foreign allegience". So in the first case it is the parents that must not have foreign alliegience, in the second the "man" himself. The first part describes "natural born" citizens, as used in the Constitution, the second "citizens".

420 posted on 08/10/2009 5:30:34 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
I don't see why anyone would find that implausible.

The issue is that Stanley Ann's transcript, both in the "filled in by typing" and computer printed versions, say that she started on in late September, but rather August 19th. It could be that both are in error, but this seems unlikely. The date was typed twice on that record, and both of the dates are definitely "8-19-61" while the computer version says 08-19-61, also twice, and the image of that is quite clear.

IF that date is correct, that gave her 15 days. An anecdotal report from one of her friends puts her in the area not latter than late August, with Barry in tow, and AFAIK, that anecdote was reported well before the transcripts surfaced.

421 posted on 08/10/2009 5:38:59 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Yes - I believe he purposely used the first name Barak at one or more times for his own reasons - as well as various last names as aliases

When at Harvard in Boston he ran up hundreds of parking tickets he managed to ignore until he was caught in 2008(?) during the campaign

I believe he has several criminal arrests under variety of his known and unknown aliases

I believe he not only received / bought cocaine in NYC, Boston, and Chicago - I believe he did more than give a little cocaine to his alleged friends - You do not buy unlimited free 6-packs for people - you expect to be paid for gas, time, trouble, aggravation

I believe he was tight with drug dealers and has been areested under one of his known or unknown aliases and simply skipped out on a court date and was never tracked down and rearrested, triied, convicted, sentenced, imprisoned

He sure was tight with Bomber Ayers - an admitted bomber and admitted rapist -


422 posted on 08/10/2009 5:53:43 PM PDT by devolve (- - .....what would the IRA do with you and your facist thugs?..... - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The issue is that Stanley Ann's transcript, both in the "filled in by typing" and computer printed versions, say that she started on in late September, but rather August 19th.

Then the transcript is likely a fake. The UW Autumn quarter does not start that early, and the Summer quarter ends right around the third week of August.

423 posted on 08/10/2009 10:46:47 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

It’s irrelevant when she began classes. We know she was there with Barry when he was a week or so old. Unless her friend lied.


424 posted on 02/13/2010 2:01:09 PM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner; MindBender; Chieftain

this is NOT A WASTE OF TIme!

Those critics that are so upset with the “birthers” miss the whole point..nothing will remove him from office, whether he was a legitimate born citizen or not. the endless Birther reports, investigations and media ridicule are VERY IMPORTANT in their own right.

The birthers constantly bring up doubt about ALL of Obama’s past...was he influenced by Muslims, how close to Ayers was he, what were his and his family’s leftist/commie leanings; how involved was he with his doping days, Why won’t he let us see his transcripts, etc? this adds fuel to the fire that Obama is at best, incompetent, at worst a commie with a nefarious, dishonest agenda.

Even IF he is legitimately born in Hawaii...WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON in his past he doesn’t want released?

And if none of the investigations reveal anything...so WHAT?

The constant Drip, Drip Drip fosters “Doubt’ in the citizens about HIM.

GO BIRTHERS!!!!

ha! and everytime Oreilly and Beck and Boortz ridcule the Birthers....HA! They are bringing up the doubt again!!
GO BIRTHERS!


425 posted on 02/13/2010 2:25:50 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
It’s irrelevant when she began classes. We know she was there with Barry when he was a week or so old. Unless her friend lied.

Find where her friend said he was only a week old.

426 posted on 02/22/2010 2:48:07 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Her friend said Stanley didn’t know how to change diapers and asked her to do it.


427 posted on 02/22/2010 3:23:32 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

Maybe Stanley wanted a little break. Did the friend say it was a newborn baby?


428 posted on 02/22/2010 3:53:11 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Find it yourself and read what I wrote again. I did NOT say ONE week. A week or so... could be a little more but mommy didn’t know how to change a diaper yet, and where was dad?


429 posted on 02/22/2010 11:02:28 AM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400401-429 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson