Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Empty Chamber Saves TPD Officer's Life (Officers were in a shootout with a man wanted for murder)
Toledo on the Move ^ | Monday, August 10, 2009 | David Custer

Posted on 08/10/2009 10:26:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway

An empty chamber in a loaded gun saved the life of a Toledo police officer.

This, after a man wanted for murder took police on a high-speed chase and an intense shoot-out.

"Officer Board came very close to losing his life last night, that's fair to say," said Toledo Police Chief Mike Navarre.

Navarre says Sunday night's shoot-out at Dorr and Westwood could have been a lot worse.

Four officers walked away from the incident unharmed: Eric Board, Diana Trevino, Charles Leroux and Lieutenant Mark Collins. The suspect, 21-year-old Devon Tyrone Woods, was not so lucky.

A three mile high-speed pursuit initially triggered from a disturbance call at Southgate Circle ended when Woods' vehicle hit one car, causing it to hit another.

When Officer Eric Board approached the suspect vehicle, police say, Board's life almost ended at point blank.

"(The suspect) pointed it at the officer, pulled the trigger, the gun did not fire, and the reason it did not fire because apparently he didn't have a round in that chamber," said Navarre.

Officer Board hit the ground and the three other officers began firing.

Police say Woods fired two rounds and took off running.

The shootout ensued and Woods fired off one more round while falling to the ground.

In all, 34 rounds were fired from police -- and three are believed to come from Woods.

Woods was shot five times, he died from his wounds.

"Officers are trained to fire and continue firing until the job is complete," said Navarre.

In studying the suspect, police discovered that Woods had a dangerous secret.

"We also learned last night that he has a warrant for his arrest for the crime of murder," said Navarre.

Not only was Woods wanted for murder, but police say the 21-year-old's rap sheet was extensive.

They say he had committed several armed robberies in the Detroit area and NBC24 discovered that he had just been let out of prison in February of this year after serving two years on a felony weapons conviction out of Wayne County.

You can view Woods' criminal past for yourself by clicking here.

All four officers involved the shootout are on paid administrative leave.

Navarre says this will help them cope with the trauma and emotional stress of being involved in such a violent incident.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: Alabama; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; dirtyharry; firearm; gun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Shooter 2.5
I finally avoided the entire controversy by switching from my tried and true 1911A1 (which I carried cocked & locked for 20 years and only drew it once) to the DA Sig P245. You pull the trigger, it goes bang. Problem solved.

My summer carry has always been a DA PPK/S in .380/9mm kurz. Doesn't go bang as loudly or effectively, but it doesn't print either.

41 posted on 08/11/2009 8:35:41 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User

Naw. The all important lawmakers probably passed a law that they could only buy 5 rounds of ammo per month. Hence the 1 empty chamber.

Next news story. “Lawmakers save cops life”!

Major /s


42 posted on 08/11/2009 9:04:56 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Become a monthly donor or FR won't be here for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I didn’t say cops shouldn’t have a round in the chamber. But for you to say everyone should have a round in the chamber or not carry a gun is asinine.

All right, instead of berating me, give me one reason why someone should carry a pistol without having a round chambered. I'm not talking about someone transporting a pistol or revolver to the range for target practice. I'm talking about the pistol one would carry on their person for protection.

43 posted on 08/11/2009 11:24:24 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
You two are a piece of work, pretty typical of the ignorance seen on here lately.

“AND for someone to say that everyone that carries a weapon “condition one” is dangerous,” It IS more dangerous than not having a round in the chamber. Isn’t that your point? My point is that level of readiness is not always required. “Most people carry semi-autos and if you think the “average joe” can cycle the slide that quickly under stress.” Yes it would take a couple of extra seconds that you may not have. Then again, you may have plenty of time. Depends on the situation and the person. Your generic answer is hogwash and your judgement on who should be able to carry is also hogwash.

No, but what I do find is that when someone starts slinging personal barbs they have lost the argument and cannot back up their position or statements.

My observations come from many years of weapons training and instruction both in the military and with various LEO Depts.

No one was attacking or belittling your position, if you can't debate the points, you might want to try an "easier" forum... facebook maybe.

44 posted on 08/11/2009 11:25:55 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
So I have no idea what you’re talking about. I was pointing out to another poster (who had never seen someone foolishly advocating carrying with an empty chamber here on FR) that there was an example of someone advocating that position right here on this very thread (and it wasn’t me.)

My bad, Apologies to you... too many threads, so much dyslexia ;-)

45 posted on 08/11/2009 11:40:14 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I finally avoided the entire controversy by switching from my tried and true 1911A1 (which I carried cocked & locked for 20 years and only drew it once) to the DA Sig P245. You pull the trigger, it goes bang. Problem solved.

My summer carry has always been a DA PPK/S in .380/9mm kurz. Doesn't go bang as loudly or effectively, but it doesn't print either.

That's why I never owned a 1911. All my training geared me towards having a pistol that was completely ready to shoot as soon as it was drawn. I carry a Glock 23 most of the time and a Ruger LCP when it's too hot to conceal anything bigger. For open carry I have my Springfield Armory XD-45.

46 posted on 08/11/2009 11:43:35 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

“No, but what I do find is that when someone starts slinging personal barbs they have lost the argument and cannot back up their position or statements.”

Yes I agree, thats why I was so disappointed when you started throwing personal attacks.

“No one was attacking or belittling your position”

You might reread your posts. You were certainly doing that. In at least one case behind my back.


47 posted on 08/11/2009 12:48:46 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

“All right, instead of berating me, give me one reason why someone should carry a pistol without having a round chambered. I’m not talking about someone transporting a pistol or revolver to the range for target practice. I’m talking about the pistol one would carry on their person for protection.”

Because most people do not put themselves in risky positions as a normal part of their day. The most important part of self defense has nothing to do with a gun. Be aware of your surroundings and you can avoid many bad events. Sure it means taking a small amount of time before you can engage an attacker but thats a tradeoff with the reduced risk of not having a round chambered round.

Sure there are times when you want to have a round chambered but that level of readiness is not always necessary. Its a personal decision and ridiculing someone or berating someone for it is low.


48 posted on 08/11/2009 12:54:06 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

“My observations come from many years of weapons training and instruction both in the military and with various LEO Depts.”

BTW I also received military training. Even the military doesn’t always chamber a round.

And LEO training isn’t all that hot. I can out shoot 75% of the cops in my town. I probably put more practice time in than 90%.


49 posted on 08/11/2009 12:56:50 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Because most people do not put themselves in risky positions as a normal part of their day. The most important part of self defense has nothing to do with a gun. Be aware of your surroundings and you can avoid many bad events. Sure it means taking a small amount of time before you can engage an attacker but thats a tradeoff with the reduced risk of not having a round chambered round.

I agree situational awareness is extremely important and I am always looking out for trouble. As a LE professional I deal with criminals on a daily basis and some of them have threatened me. But SA isn't a cure-all. As for the reduced risk of not having a round chambered, I don't know what you're talking about. As long as your pistol is in its holster, there is no chance of a round being discharged. If you pull your pistol from its holster, it means you're in trouble and it needs to be ready immediately. You don't need to be in a risky area to at risk.

I don't know what military you were associated with, but with the M-9 the standard carry was round chambered and weapon decocked with the safety off. That was even during training exercises.

50 posted on 08/11/2009 1:49:58 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

“I don’t know what military you were associated with,”

Air Force, M60 and M16


51 posted on 08/11/2009 2:59:49 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Air Force, M60 and M16

Now I see what the problem is... my old man retired AF with 34 yrs and he was a DH too. ;-)

Maybe I wasn't clear, in the military I was a Small Arms Instructor, Aerial Gunnery Instructor and later trained and certified as a Firearms Instructor by the state LE Academy, so I've been teaching this stuff quite awhile... but you've probably done that too... geez.

52 posted on 08/11/2009 6:02:30 PM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fso301
"(The suspect) pointed it at the officer, pulled the trigger, the gun did not fire, and the reason it did not fire because apparently he didn't have a round in that chamber," said Navarre.

If one assumes that Navarre is speaking correctly, we have it from him that it was a revolver.

53 posted on 08/11/2009 7:04:07 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I am glad the guy messed up where his ‘empty chamber’ was but it shows how you can screw up when you don’t load all your chambers.


54 posted on 08/11/2009 7:07:04 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

criminal usually don’t have great gun handling skills from what I’ve heard.

are you stalking me now?


55 posted on 08/11/2009 7:08:42 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

So you know first hand how bad most LEOs are at handling their firearm and how seldom most actually go to the range.

But no I wasn’t an instructor, I was in the field. Was also underground a lot but would have to kill ya if I told you about that.


56 posted on 08/11/2009 7:10:53 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

You aren’t this guy are you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP6UvNgbqIA


57 posted on 08/11/2009 7:12:11 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
touche,

I couldn't believe the find! Actually, I wan't mining. I remembered seeing your name before and I was trying to refresh my memory on who you were. :)

are you stalking me now?

Not really. I always fully load my revolvers.

58 posted on 08/11/2009 7:13:54 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

“Not really. I always fully load my revolvers.”

The only revolver I have is an old .22 with a 9” barrel that I got from my uncle.


59 posted on 08/11/2009 7:16:32 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
The only revolver I have is an old .22 with a 9” barrel that I got from my uncle.

Ruger recalled all their older revolvers and installed safety bars. The Blackhawk I bought in 1973 had a safety bar so it must have been in the early 70's that manufacturers added this feature..

60 posted on 08/11/2009 7:22:05 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson