Posted on 08/11/2009 5:41:23 AM PDT by SJackson
Seventy-one senators have signed an AIPAC-backed letter to US President Barack Obama supporting his effort to encourage Arab states to normalize relations with Israel.
It comes after Americans for Peace Now and other left-wing pro-Israel groups - including Brit Tzedek v'Shalom and J Street - made a battleground of the document, which was circulated by Sens. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and James Risch, (R-Idaho). They called on senators not to sign it unless it is amended to include mention of steps that all the parties in the Middle East need to take towards peace - especially Israel's need to stop settlement construction.
The letter, though, was held open a few more days than planned in order to continue to gather signatures - the total of 71 was announced on Monday, but the original "Dear Colleague" letter said the letter was scheduled to close the prior Wednesday. The letter gained around 30 signatories since Wednesday morning.
Just six of the 13 Jewish senators signed the missive - Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Joe Lieberman (I-Ct.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). Among those not signing the letter were Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
The Bayh-Risch letter says that "over the past few months Israel has taken concrete measures to reaffirm its commitment to advancing the peace process," such as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backing a two-state solution and the removal of roadblocks and other measures to "improve the daily lives of Palestinians."
"We encourage Arab leaders to take similar tangible steps to demonstrate their commitment to the peace process," write the senators. "Such steps could include ending the Arab League boycott of Israel, meeting openly with Israeli officials, establishing open trade relations with Israel, issuing visas to Israeli citizens, and inviting Israelis to participate in academic and professional conferences and sporting events. We also believe that Arab states must immediately and permanently end official propaganda campaigns which demonize Israel and Jews."
APN said that "the subtext of the letter directly contradicts and undermines the efforts" of the Obama administration "to promote Middle East peace" and "sends a message that the signers consider settlements more important than peace."
Meanwhile, before the letter was officially closed, American Jewish Congress president Richard Gordon penned a piece encouraging senators to back the letter, and arguing that settlements are part of a different discussion.
"I was surprised, and more than a bit disappointed, to read the comments by my colleagues at Americans for Peace Now and J Street opposing the letter being circulated by Senators Evan Bayh and Jim Risch supporting the president's efforts to encourage Arab states to normalize relations with the State of Israel," he said. "What is important about the letter is what it contains, not what it does not. Every nation has the right to have its existence recognized by its fellow nations. Israel is no different than any other nation in this regard. This is a critical and necessary first step in any peace discussion. How can a nation be at peace with nations that do not recognize it even exists?
The fact that the Bayh-Risch letter does not discuss the status of the settlements does not detract from its importance. The status of the settlements is a distinct and different discussion. It is secondary to the very simple and long overdue notion of Arab nations' recognizing Israel's legitimacy as a nation.
There is no reason to couple these discussions. In fact, by doing so, Americans and members of the Jewish community distract from focusing on the most critical issue, Israel's right to exist.
The Arab world's refusal to recognize Israel has nothing to do with settlements. It dates back to the very founding of the State of Israel itself, more than 60 years ago. It predates the 1967 war.
In fact, it predates the building of the first settlement. Except for Jordan and Egypt, whose efforts towards peace Senators Bayh and Risch correctly recognized in their letter, the policy of rejecting Israel's sovereignty by all of the other Arab nations, continues unbroken to this day. With or without the settlements, there is no reason to believe it would not continue. That is why it is so important not to couple these issues. In order for there to be peace in the Middle East, Arab nations must first acknowledge the legitimacy of Israel as a nation in that region.
The Bayh-Risch letter is important not only to Jews but to all supporters of the state of Israel because it recognizes Israel's numerous unilateral steps towards peace and calls on 'Arab leaders to take similar tangible steps to demonstrate their commitment to the peace process'. It then goes on to list numerous ways in which Arab nations can do so. The first and most important of which is to recognize the State of Israel.
Instead of rejecting the Bayh-Risch letter for its failure to discuss the settlement issue-which is important, and needs to be addressed as a part of the peace process-we call on our fellow Jewish organizations and their members to vigorously support the letter as an expression of support for the State of Israel, its unconditional right to exist and be recognized by its neighbors, and for its call for Arab nations to meet Israel halfway on the road to peace.
It is understandable that Palestinians and Arab nations latch on to the settlement issue as an excuse to continue to avoid recognizing Israel.
What is unfathomable is why those who claim to love Israel would give them cover in continuing their decades-long refusal to acknowledge Israel's place in the Middle East.
Over the past few months Israel has taken concrete measures to reaffirm its commitmentto advancing the peace process. Notably, Prime Minister Netanyahu has publically expressedsupport for the two-state solution and called for the immediate resumption of peace negotiations. We have also been encouraged by Israeli efforts to improve the daily lives of Palestinians,through measures such as removing roadblocks, assisting with economic development in theWest Bank, and supporting the training of professional Palestinian Authority security personnel. These actions have demonstrated that Israel is willing to back up its words with concrete actions,even in the face of continuing threats to its security.
We encourage Arab leaders to take similar tangible steps to demonstrate theircommitment to the peace process. Such steps could include ending the Arab League boycott ofIsrael, meeting openly with Israeli officials, establishing open trade relations with Israel, issuingvisas to Israeli citizens, and inviting Israelis to participate in academic and professionalconferences and sporting events. We also believe that Arab states must immediately andpermanently end official propaganda campaigns which demonize Israel and Jews.
Given these facts, we would like to understand what steps you are urging Arab states totake and what your expectations are from Arab states in the coming weeks and months. We also hope that you will continue to press Arab leaders to consider dramatic gestures toward Israelsimilar to those taken previously by brave leaders like King Hussein of Jordan and Anwar El-Sadat of Egypt. Such gestures would send a powerful signal that Arab nations are committed tothe peace process and could help usher in a new era of peace and security in the Middle East.
Respectfully,
He needs to Press 9 for CLUE............................
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Letter in post 1. Pretty much common sense.
Obama's anti-Israel posture is out-of-step with about 80% of Congress and that much of the American people. Republicans should be beating him over the head with this several times a week as one more illustration of his radical, anti-American and anti-freedom agenda.
It’s not a high profile issue, but you’re right, Republicans should be speaking out more since it’s a loser for the dems. Thus far there’s been as much criticism from Congressional dems. A good time to push for compliance with the Embassy Act, the Congressional mandate to move our Embassy to Jerusalem
Most Dems do have a self-preservation gene that kicks in when their president gets too out-of-touch with the American people.
And Republicans should definitely talk about Obama's unfair treatement of Israel fairly often.
The list, ping
It looks like it kicked in on cap and trade and stimulus II. I suspect it may on health care as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.