Skip to comments.10 Surprising Facts about American Health Care
Posted on 08/14/2009 2:02:48 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Medical care in the United States is derided as miserable compared to health care systems in the rest of the developed world. Economists, government officials, insurers and academics alike are beating the drum for a far larger government rôle in health care. Much of the public assumes their arguments are sound because the calls for change are so ubiquitous and the topic so complex.
However, before turning to government as the solution, some unheralded facts about America's health care system should be considered.
Fact No. 1: Americans have better survival rates than Europeans for common cancers.  Breast cancer mortality is 52 percent higher in Germany than in the United States, and 88 percent higher in the United Kingdom. Prostate cancer mortality is 604 percent higher in the U.K. and 457 percent higher in Norway. The mortality rate for colorectal cancer among British men and women is about 40 percent higher.
Fact No. 2: Americans have lower cancer mortality rates than Canadians.  Breast cancer mortality is 9 percent higher, prostate cancer is 184 percent higher and colon cancer mortality among men is about 10 percent higher than in the United States.
Fact No. 3: Americans have better access to treatment for chronic diseases than patients in other developed countries.  Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit are taking statins, which reduce cholesterol and protect against heart disease. By comparison, of those patients who could benefit from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29 percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent of Britons and 17 percent of Italians receive them.
(Excerpt) Read more at ncpa.org ...
Fact No. 3: Americans have better access to treatment for chronic diseases than patients in other developed countries. Some 56 percent of Americans who could benefit are taking statins, which reduce cholesterol and protect against heart disease. By comparison, of those patients who could benefit from these drugs, only 36 percent of the Dutch, 29 percent of the Swiss, 26 percent of Germans, 23 percent of Britons and 17 percent of Italians receive them.
Fact No. 4: Americans have better access to preventive cancer screening than Canadians. Take the proportion of the appropriate-age population groups who have received recommended tests for breast, cervical, prostate and colon cancer:
Nine of 10 middle-aged American women (89 percent) have had a mammogram, compared to less than three-fourths of Canadians (72 percent).
Nearly all American women (96 percent) have had a pap smear, compared to less than 90 percent of Canadians.
More than half of American men (54 percent) have had a PSA test, compared to less than 1 in 6 Canadians (16 percent).
Nearly one-third of Americans (30 percent) have had a colonoscopy, compared with less than 1 in 20 Canadians (5 percent).
Fact No. 5: Lower income Americans are in better health than comparable Canadians. Twice as many American seniors with below-median incomes self-report “excellent” health compared to Canadian seniors (11.7 percent versus 5.8 percent). Conversely, white Canadian young adults with below-median incomes are 20 percent more likely than lower income Americans to describe their health as “fair or poor.”
Fact No. 6: Americans spend less time waiting for care than patients in Canada and the U.K. Canadian and British patients wait about twice as long - sometimes more than a year - to see a specialist, to have elective surgery like hip replacements or to get radiation treatment for cancer. All told, 827,429 people are waiting for some type of procedure in Canada. In England, nearly 1.8 million people are waiting for a hospital admission or outpatient treatment.
Fact No. 7: People in countries with more government control of health care are highly dissatisfied and believe reform is needed. More than 70 percent of German, Canadian, Australian, New Zealand and British adults say their health system needs either “fundamental change” or “complete rebuilding.”
Fact No. 8: Americans are more satisfied with the care they receive than Canadians. When asked about their own health care instead of the “health care system,” more than half of Americans (51.3 percent) are very satisfied with their health care services, compared to only 41.5 percent of Canadians; a lower proportion of Americans are dissatisfied (6.8 percent) than Canadians (8.5 percent).
Fact No. 9: Americans have much better access to important new technologies like medical imaging than patients in Canada or the U.K. Maligned as a waste by economists and policymakers naïve to actual medical practice, an overwhelming majority of leading American physicians identified computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the most important medical innovations for improving patient care during the previous decade. [See the table.] The United States has 34 CT scanners per million Americans, compared to 12 in Canada and eight in Britain. The United States has nearly 27 MRI machines per million compared to about 6 per million in Canada and Britain.
Fact No. 10: Americans are responsible for the vast majority of all health care innovations. The top five U.S. hospitals conduct more clinical trials than all the hospitals in any other single developed country. Since the mid-1970s, the Nobel Prize in medicine or physiology has gone to American residents more often than recipients from all other countries combined. In only five of the past 34 years did a scientist living in America not win or share in the prize. Most important recent medical innovations were developed in the United States. [See the table.]
Conclusion. Despite serious challenges, such as escalating costs and the uninsured, the U.S. health care system compares favorably to those in other developed countries.
The President has denounced these types of right wing fanactial fear tactics.
Please report yourself here:
In a nutshell it is because we do NOT have total government care yet that Obama craves!
Listen and watch him state that FACT.
Obama on single payer health insurance
Another one 6/15/09
Obama IN HIS OWN WORDS saying His Health Care Plan will ELIMINATE private insurance - 6/15/09
Obama is committed to make this his GOAL at the end of his first term.
BTW, his buddies are very dangerous that are PUSHING THIS THROUGH.
Precislye what makes America’s heath care system the best in the world and the envy of the world is what he wants to eliminate. Technological advancement will be slowed down to more people can die. As a human being, it will be determined whether YOU are worth the cost of care.
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. He has already been appointed to two key positions: health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Emanuel bluntly admits that the cuts will not be pain-free. Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely lipstick cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change, he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008).
Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).
Yes, thats what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.
Many doctors are horrified by this notion; theyll tell you that a doctors job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.
Emanuel, however, believes that communitarianism should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. 96).
Translation: Dont give much care to a grandmother with Parkinsons or a child with cerebral palsy.
He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years (Lancet, Jan. 31).
Dr. David Blumenthal, another key Obama adviser, agrees. He recommends slowing medical innovation to control health spending.
Blumenthal has long advocated government health-spending controls, though he concedes theyre associated with longer waits and reduced availability of new and expensive treatments and devices (New England Journal of Medicine, March 8, 2001). But he calls it debatable whether the timely care Americans get is worth the cost. (Ask a cancer patient, and youll get a different answer. Delay lowers your chances of survival.)
Obama appointed Blumenthal as national coordinator of health-information technology, a job that involves making sure doctors obey electronically deivered guidelines about what care the government deems appropriate and cost effective.
In the April 9 New England Journal of Medicine, Blumenthal predicted that many doctors would resist embedded clinical decision support a euphemism for computers telling doctors what to do.
Its true even if you dont want to believe it.
The YOUNG and OLD are not folks Obama wants around.
Report me instead!
Ping for later.
How dare you post this filth....It’s racism and I’ve reported you!/s
Hmmm...I wonder why the Canadians cancer rates are closer to the US rates than those in Europe? Hmmm, I really wonder why.
What do you guys think? Could the Canadians be border hopping to get their cancer treated here in the US?
That’s crazy talk isn’t it?
The data in this report is incomplete, i.e.: 95% of Canadians go to the emergency room every time they get the sniffles.
My wife is from Canada and hates their medical care but my mother-in-law loves it. The MIL thinks it’s great because you can run to “outpatients” when you get a cold but they won’t replace her knee because at 58 years old, she’s too young. They said they don’t want to have to replace it again if she lives a long time.
Everyone knows that socialism is amazing and always works... *rolls eyes*
Basically Regan had it right, government is not the solution to the problem, government IS the problem.
The government has purposely created a healthcare crisis, and is now putting forth socialism as the only solution to the problem.
That's interesting . My ex-wife lives in Ontario and has had both her knees done. She turned 60 yesterday. Maybe your ML should talk to a different doctor.
I used that address to sign up for free viagra email, motorhome brochures,rifle an pistol catalogs ,adult diapers sales enquiries ,and planned parenthood email updates !!
Bump and thanks for this article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.