Skip to comments.Democrats for the Republicans to target in 2010
Posted on 08/14/2009 2:30:22 PM PDT by dangus
Democrat seemingly doomed:
Nevada Much has been made about strong candidates passing up the opportunity to knock out Sen. Harry Reid. Big deal. GOP chairwoman and state senator Sue Lowden even handily defeats Reid, 48-42. All the cash in the world cant help Reid escape the dishonor of being the most hated senator in America.
North Dakota Gov. John Hoeven has gained 39 points on Sen. Byron Dorgan in six months. Yeah, you read that right. Hoeven now leads by 17. Even if he doesnt run, with Dorgan that unpopular, Duane Sand can kick a little well, sand, in his eyes.
Pennsylvania Specter is trailing Toomey by 12, but is still strong over primary opponent Sestak.
Connecticut (RINO ALERT!!!) Dodd trails liberal Republican, Rep. Simmons by 9, so this seat looks likely to be Republican until Simmons senses the pendulum is swinging back towards the Democrats and pulls a Jim Jeffords.
Delaware (RINO ALERT!!!) Joe Bidens replacement, Sen. Kaufman is retiring. Beau Biden is the would-be designated heir. Except that liberal Republican, Rep. Mike Castle is beating him by 21 points. Hey guys, can we nominate from the RIGHT of Arlen Specter and Jim Jeffords? I know its a liberal state, but I think the Caste-Biden poll indicates that a gay child porn producer in a KKK hood could beat Biden. Why waste the chance by nominating a Democrat for the Republican nod?
Arkansas Blanche Lincoln was already losing to assorted Republican no-names, back in March, before Arkansas felt the same way about Obama that Hillary feels about Bill. Just think whatll happen if a real candidate emerges.
Colorado Unelected Bennet was already losing to Owens and Beauprez back when America loved Obama. Maybe a real Republican might decide to throw down?
Illinois (RINO ALERT!!!) Sen. Roland Burris has given up any hope of retaining this seat. Republican Rep. Mark Kirk is more liberal than Democratic Rep. Dan Lipinski, who is far to the left of his father, former Rep. William Lipinski. But Rep. Kirk is far more likely than Janice Schackowski or anyone else likely to run for Obamas old Senate seat.
California (RINO ALERT?) Barbara Boxer leads former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina by only four points, and is way under 50% (45-41).
Indiana Theres a lack of any polling to demonstrate that Sen. Evan Bayhs once soaring popularity is down to the vulnerable range, but he is very liberal and Indiana is fairly conservative. He can win, but he needs to play it smart.
Hawaii If Sen. Innouye, who will be 86, runs again, without showing declining mental or tempermental faculties, he should be able to beat even popular Gov. Linda Lingle. Otherwise, Lingle probably could win, if shes up for a tough battle.
New York (RINO ALERT!!!) Liberal former governor George Pataki polls about even with Gillibrand, but the Republicans may not be her biggest worry.
Wisconsin Feingolds popularity remains modest, but sufficient, but Obamas is falling fast in Wisconsin (under 50%), so a smart campaigner might be able to dent Feingolds reformist stance by linking them.
Safe I guess:
Washington Im disregarding a hunch that Sen. Murray should be vulnerable, but wouldnt Rossi make for interesting surprise attack?
Oregon Oregon seems safely liberal. But so does Connecticut. But Wyden isnt the scandal magnet Dodd is.
Mikulski Unless she gets caught on video having sex with a dead boy, shes in. Even then, she could probably claim it was really Helen Thomas and no-one would dare challenge the claim.
Schumer Even if the New York Republican Party had any fire in their bellies, theyd use their good candidates to run for Gillibrands seat, or the statehouse.
Vermont The other Senator was elected as an avowed socialist. Something tells me that this red-in-the-old-fashioned-sense state wont have a problem with Leahy siding with some socialist policies. That something is common sense.
thats it? Dont worry; although there arent many incumbent Democrats this cycle, therell be loads of easy pick-ups for the Republicans in 2012 and 2014, even if the two parties swings back to a rough parity in popularity.
We should ditch Simmons and get behind Peter Schiff. He’s raised more in one month than Simmons did in the entire quarter. Simmons is RINO. Peter Schiff agrees with conservatives on more issues than some bleu state cheese eating pro-choice RINO loser like Simmons.
GREAT NEWS! I’m thrilled to know there’s someone ELSE raising money to beat Chris Dodd! Not being a current office-holder, he escaped my research. Ron Paul type, huh? Well, we could use at least one of those in the Senate. He’d be a LOT better than Simmons or Dudd.
Here in the 7th Congressional District in Michigan, we’re hoping to unseat uber-lib Mark Schauer. He replaced Tim Walberg (a good conservative) last November, done-in IMHO by Bush’s push and passage of TARP.
Tim is going to run again. I hope this district has a BIG case of buyer’s remorse, especially after Schauer’s so-called “phone-in” town halls.
1) The Dems have to fight through a primary;
2) According to my source, Portman has been a fundraising machine, burying either of the Dems.
3) He isn't exactly a state wide name, having last served in the Congress from the Cincy area. Bottom line, they aren't worried at all.
Meanwhile, Kasich appears to be even with Ted Strickland.
In both cases, you'd be getting a MUCH more conservative guy (Portman over Voinovich and Kasich over Strickland).
And Peter is a person of integrity. He’s not someone, that can be corrupted by Washtingon. He doesn’t plan to be a career politican, so he don’t give a damn if he gets re-elected or not. He will go there to straighten things and hopefully convince enough weak knee gop to stand firm
Looks like Christine O’Donnell is running for Senate in Delaware. She’s firmly conservative.
Peter Schiff: Why the Meltdown Should Have Surprised No One
If you’re not convinced
I wouldn’t concede to Oregon’s Wyden and Washington’s Murray! They are not exactly heavy hitters even if in lib States.
gop doesnt need to be ideologically pure. They just need to vote small government all the time. You can’t be socially liberal and a socialist and all yourself a republican. In some of these seats where the RINO are far ahead Democrat incumbant, we should back the more Conservative candidate in the primary. We don’t need a rino to win 70%-30% in the state. If gop win 55%-45% with a more conservative candidate, its just as good
>> The party who has a majority in the Senate controls the agenda. The majority party determines what legislation will be acted upon, and what will die silently in committee. <<
In 2000, chairmanships of the key committees went to Arlen Specter, George Voinovich, Jim Jeffords, Sue Collins, and Lincoln Chafee. Only someone who doesn’t understand elections could say what you just said. If the GOP were to barely win the Senate, they could be vilified for all the tough choices they make, and the RINOs control the agenda, destroying the credibility of the Republican party.
For God’s sake, man, haven’t you learned how deadly RINOs in charge are? It’s like you’re in Pearl Harbor in 1942, still arguing that we can keep the peace with Japan.
I tried to express that it ain’t a done deal even in those states.
The issue is that there’s a core of moneybags in the GOP who hate conservatives as much as any socialist, and there’s a wider group of Republican surrender-monkeys who think, for some reason, that the best way to beat a socialist is to make sure you never disagree with them.
In Washington, Rossi beat Governor Gregoire (”Wilma Flintstone”) in 2004, but she took it to court and won it there just as Franken did. In other words, the DemocRats can be beat in these blue States. And especially if Obama keeps pushing his socialist heathcare bill.
its a good point. Look how the media/democrats is playing it. They’re say, gop were in control all this time and they ruined everything. GOP were never in control. They were constantly undermined by the RINOs, but GOP got blamed for everything
Oh, I forgot this one: there is talk that in FL, Martinez’s early resignation means that Crist may be forced to appoint Rubio. Ok, so if all we did was replace Voino with Portman, Martinez with Rubio, and Sphincter with Toomey, (yes, he’s a Dem now, I know) that would be three formerly GOP seat that moved significantly to the right without changing hands (again, except in Sphincter’s seat).
I see your point but, to me, a bulkhead needs to be established so the most heinous parts of Obama’s socialism never become law. Not only does a majority mean you get the committee chairmanships but you also get more Senators on your committee from your party than they get. That will be crucial in 2011-2012.
One chamber can’t roll back the damage that has been done but they can stand in the way of implementing the rest of the neo-com package Obama wants to implement.
I just worry that the Democrat vote fraud apperatus may defeat us even if the poll numbers favor us. You can’t poll dead people and illegals, both of which vote solid Democrat.
I don’t think we will have a problem hammering Minnick in Idaho. Admittedly, he has opposed ObamaCare and he voted against the ‘stimulus’. He did vote FOR that stupid GIVE Act though.
Minnick has a big red ‘D’ on his forehead. Part of the reason we have Pelosi as speaker. We should have no problem pointing out he is a democrat and tie in with the disgust of Idahoans for congress and the administration.
He should be on a list as a target for turning Republican. We just need a good candidate.