The point here seems to be that there are shameful things that are not, at least technically, illegal things.
“The point here seems to be that there are shameful things that are not, at least technically, illegal things.”
I would, with respect, disagree with that.
I view it this way. Now “ethics” has been redefined based on who the violator is. If it is a GOPer, then, you must “walk on water”. If you are a Demoncrat, the “sky is the limit” on what you are allowed to do.