Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nissan claims 367 mpg for electric Leaf
The Car Tech blog ^ | August 14, 2009 | Antuan Goodwin

Posted on 08/15/2009 12:03:45 PM PDT by freebilly

OK, these ridiculous mpg claims are starting to get out of hand. Earlier this week, General Motors announced an estimated 230 mpg for the upcoming Volt extended-range EV--a claim that was later undermined by the EPA. No doubt attempting to steal a bit of GM's thunder, Nissan claimed (via Twitter) that its upcoming Leaf EV could do better:

"Nissan Leaf = 367 mpg, no tailpipe, and no gas required. Oh yeah, and it'll be affordable too!"

At first, we thought this was an odd claim to make, seeing that the Leaf is fully electric and (as stated in the same tweet) doesn't actually use gasoline or diesel fuel. Nissan, followed up later with another tweet stating that they were using a DOE formula to estimate the 367 mpg equivalency for the electric LEAF, but doesn't that just confuse prospective customers further with obtuse conversions?

What do you think, wise and noble reader? In a world where vehicles run on gasoline, diesel, hydrogen, ethanol, alcohol, natural gas, and electricity (to name a few), is it time for a new efficiency metric or should we stick with old faithful (if not sometimes inapplicable) miles per gallon?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automakers; cars; electric; electriccars; energy; generalmotors; leaf; nissan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151 next last
Yeah, let's all spend $40,000 on a car that only takes us 12,000-14,000 miles per year. Let's figure this out: If you only get 20mpg in your clunker then 14,000 miles = 700 gallons of gas. Let's assume that gas will go to $5.00/gallon, which means that you'll pay $3500/year for gas. Over 5 years you'll pay $17,500 fueling your clunker. And you don't have to burn coal to power your clunker.

Now if you buy a Honda Civic for $18,000 that gets 30mpg, after 5 years you will have spent $11,000 on fuel (given the 40 miles per day scenario. In any event, electric cars don't pencil out....

1 posted on 08/15/2009 12:03:47 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freebilly

To be fair, their mpg ratings should factor in the energy required to make the electricity.

Now if they wanted to go to nuclear power, I’m much more interested.


2 posted on 08/15/2009 12:07:40 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Fish rot from the head down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

My regular 4 dr 6 cyl. Kia Optima gets over 420 highway miles to one tank of gas. IOW it has RANGE! Until they can make an alternatively feuled vehicle that can do that, is safe to drive on our highways and costs the same or LESS than my regular gasoline vehicle they can stuff their wind-up toy cars where the SUN DON’T SHINE!


3 posted on 08/15/2009 12:08:21 PM PDT by Grunthor (Obama has delusions of adequacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I’ll wait until they power the car with a mini nuclear power plant....


4 posted on 08/15/2009 12:09:47 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Ping to Mr. Mercat.


5 posted on 08/15/2009 12:13:07 PM PDT by Huntress (Who the hell are you to tell me what's in my best interests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
My regular 4 dr 6 cyl. Kia Optima gets over 420 highway miles to one tank of gas. IOW it has RANGE!

I can get 400 miles plus on a single tank in MY vehicle too. Problem is, its a 35 gallon tank.

6 posted on 08/15/2009 12:13:24 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

At the VA hospital where I recently spent some inpatient time, they have an electric parking-lot shuttle...

One day, out of sheer boredom, I struck up a conversation with the driver, asking him how much a vehicle like that cost...

He told me that it cost $24,000, was not ‘street legal’, ran 4 hours, max, before needing 12 hours of charge, and was often ‘down for maintenance’...

They called it ‘The Obamamobile’.......


7 posted on 08/15/2009 12:15:00 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

A talk show host on WNIR in Kent, Ohio used those same figures yesterday!


8 posted on 08/15/2009 12:15:35 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Question - what is the cost of charging up this type of car (electrical cost) - is it no big deal or would it zoom up the electric bill over one year?


9 posted on 08/15/2009 12:18:11 PM PDT by unique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

“Now if they wanted to go to nuclear power, I’m much more interested.”

MPR = Miles Per RAD ?

And I agree with a “truth in mileage” requirement.


10 posted on 08/15/2009 12:23:50 PM PDT by PLMerite (Speak Truth to Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unique
GM claims "a cost of about 80 cents per day (10 cents per kWh) for a full charge."

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Chevrolet_Volt/

11 posted on 08/15/2009 12:24:07 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

When did they start selling electricity by the gallon? This is BS.


12 posted on 08/15/2009 12:24:31 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (January 20th, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I’ll wait until they power the car with a mini nuclear power plant....

A flux capacitor that runs off of waste.

13 posted on 08/15/2009 12:25:05 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I’ll wait until they power the car with a mini nuclear power plant....

I remember my Dad saying the same thing back in the 70's! He believed there was a conspiracy to keep nuclear from the masses ny the Big Oil companies. This was before big Enviro lobbies were in full bloom.

14 posted on 08/15/2009 12:25:28 PM PDT by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
A flux capacitor that runs off of waste.

If it can take me back to 1973 then I'll gladly pay $50,000 for it....

15 posted on 08/15/2009 12:26:21 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
When did they start selling electricity by the gallon? This is BS.

C'mon, I just went up to Wal-Mart this morning and bought 5 gallons of liquid electricity in the automotive section....

16 posted on 08/15/2009 12:31:42 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: digger48

“Problem is, its a 35 gallon tank.”

Mine is a 16 gallon.


17 posted on 08/15/2009 12:31:56 PM PDT by Grunthor (Obama has delusions of adequacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Miles-per-gallon is a misleading comparison number for math-illiterate people (i.e., many Americans, including Obama and his cash-for-clunkers program), itself, even without all the fuel games. Gallons-per-mile or gallons-per-10,000-miles would be a good first step at getting at helping people to understand the true fuel usage comparisons.*

But knowing how the EPA works, it is likely that even were we to see revisions, we would get formulae that allow even more gaming of the system in place of actual transparency.

*"For example, most people ranked an improvement from 34 to 50 mpg as saving more gas over 10,000 miles than an improvement from 18 to 28 mpg, even though the latter saves twice as much gas. (Going from 34 to 50 mpg saves 94 gallons; but from 18 to 28 mpg saves 198 gallons)." (Science Daily)

18 posted on 08/15/2009 12:35:38 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

And I could make a car that gets infinite mpg, but it would have pedals on it.


19 posted on 08/15/2009 12:36:44 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Lets see if I can guess what will happen;

I buy this car that gets 367 miles per gallon of gas, Great

To charge this great car will require special electrical hook up, not so great.

There will be a cost for this special electrical hook up at #10.00 per hour and a 4 hour recharge requirement. not so great.

Since gas is not selling as well the price will increase to $10.00 per gallon, not so great.

The battery in this great car will only last 2 years, and to replace it, without the installation costs, will cost $3000.00, not so great.

Special recharge facilities will be few and far between and only be able to handle a limited number of cars, not so great

As more special recharge facilities are built they will require additional electric service which will cause that cost to increase, not so great.

Sooooooooooo, it appears that the great saving with electric cars end up costing 2, 3 times as much as the cars we now drive, not so great.


20 posted on 08/15/2009 12:42:38 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

and after 1000 or so charges .. the batteries will have to be REPLACED .. dunno... they saying anywhere between $5000 and $10,000 ... and those fancy batteries cannot be recycled yet... so the GREENIES ARE SCREWING themselves with their shortsightedness.


21 posted on 08/15/2009 12:43:54 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - To Conservatives, a WARNING - to Liberals, a TEXTBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I’ll wait until they power the car with a mini nuclear power plant....

I wrote a design paper for one in college. Actually, not a conventional reactor, but one that ran off of heat from a certain isotope of the fuel expelled from a reactor.

22 posted on 08/15/2009 12:46:43 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56
So after three years you have to pay an additional $5-10K just for the batteries?

BWAHAHAHAHA...!

23 posted on 08/15/2009 12:47:34 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: unique
Question - what is the cost of charging up this type of car (electrical cost) - is it no big deal or would it zoom up the electric bill over one year?

Two to four cents a mile for larger vehicles. A penny per mile for the Volt.

24 posted on 08/15/2009 12:48:10 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

I once bought a used (107,000 miles) 1988 Ford Crown Victoria as a commuter car. I paid $3500.00 and paid another $1000.00 in repairs over the next eight years. I drove it 18,000 miles per year and it got 30 MPG. I sold it for $800.00. Gas averaged $2.00 per gallon, but using your figure of $5.00 a gallon, it cost $3,000 per year to fuel, but the total cost to run including gas was 20 cents per mile. And that’s not even factoring in insurance cost savings (no need for comprehensive coverage).

That’s how the average driver saves money, not by purchasing eco-status symbols.


25 posted on 08/15/2009 12:48:14 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obama is in way over his ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly; P.O.E.

Don’t hire Ukrainian operators for your mini-nuclear power plants - just a suggestion

They might try a wacky “power-failure” test again.


26 posted on 08/15/2009 12:50:02 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
The battery in this great car will only last 2 years, and to replace it, without the installation costs, will cost $3000.00, not so great.

It will have at least a 10 year warranty. Toyota is reporting excellent lifetimes of their hybrids.

-----------------

Hybrids have taken a bad rap for their battery packs – with claims (usually made by people with a political axe to grind) that the disposal of batteries makes a hybrid a bad environmental choice, and that the battery packs must be replaced at huge expense every year or two. It turns out that at least the latter claim is completely false. Out of 750,000 Prius battery packs produced and distributed so far, only 306 have been replaced as worn-out or a warranty fault. “The life of the battery pack is generally about the same as the life of the vehicle,” said Toyota’s Jeremiah Shown.

27 posted on 08/15/2009 12:51:20 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
but the total cost to run including gas was 20 cents per mile. And that’s not even factoring in insurance cost savings (no need for comprehensive coverage).

That’s how the average driver saves money, not by purchasing eco-status symbols.

The average American has more commonsense than the left thinks....

28 posted on 08/15/2009 12:51:32 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: unique
1.34 hp = 1 KW Or given that 1 hp = 550 ft·lbf/s, 1 ft = 0.3048 m.

Figure out how far you want to go, in what time time,(mph) convert that into KWH, then check what you pay per KWH. THEN, you need to figure out how many KWH the charger soaks up to stuff a KW of power back into the battery.

Or you can just say electricity costs a heck of a lot more than gas, and with Obama cap and trade figured into the carbon cost of electricity, if you think gas is expensive, wait till you pay for the cost of electricity for that obamabile.

29 posted on 08/15/2009 12:51:36 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Yeah, let’s all spend $40,000 on a car that only takes us 12,000-14,000 miles per year. Let’s figure this out: If you only get 20mpg in your clunker then 14,000 miles = 700 gallons of gas. Let’s assume that gas will go to $5.00/gallon, which means that you’ll pay $3500/year for gas. Over 5 years you’ll pay $17,500 fueling your clunker. And you don’t have to burn coal to power your clunker.

Now if you buy a Honda Civic for $18,000 that gets 30mpg, after 5 years you will have spent $11,000 on fuel (given the 40 miles per day scenario. In any event, electric cars don’t pencil out....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You have to also add in:

The interest paid on the extra $22,000 dollars you are paying for the electric car.

The interest you lost by spending that $22,000 instead of investing it.


30 posted on 08/15/2009 12:51:54 PM PDT by Brookhaven (Film everything and put it on YouTube.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

My Dodge RAM V8/4.7 gets 350-375 on a tank. My electric bill on the other hand...


31 posted on 08/15/2009 12:56:12 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Hows My Posting? Please Contact flag@whitehouse.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Or you can just say electricity costs a heck of a lot more than gas,

Uh, fleet vehicle reports show that electrical propulsion is the cheaper. Cents per mile from two to four. At four cents per mile that is about $1 per gall of gas equivalent since the reports I saw were utility vehicles which were large SUV's.

and with Obama cap and trade figured into the carbon cost of electricity, if you think gas is expensive, wait till you pay for the cost of electricity for that obamabile.

You are living in la la land if you think gasoline will be exempt from cap-and-trade.

32 posted on 08/15/2009 12:57:52 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

As someone else pointed out, just wait until Cap & Trade is implemented. The additional charges on electrical use will make drivers of electric cars somewhat unhappy....


33 posted on 08/15/2009 12:58:50 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
1.34 hp = 1 KW Or given that 1 hp = 550 ft·lbf/s, 1 ft = 0.3048 m. Figure out how far you want to go, in what time time,(mph) convert that into KWH,

I want to go 60 miles in one hour. Please show me the number of KWH derived from your above numbers.

34 posted on 08/15/2009 1:00:17 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
"GM claims "a cost of about 80 cents per day (10 cents per kWh) for a full charge."

I don't believe that. There are huge losses involved. Batteries don't just absorb a electron in for every electron out from the charger, and the charger doesn't produce one electron of charging force for every electron comming out of the 120/240v line.

And every electron put out from the battery does not go directly towards the forward motion (power=force/time=force.distance/time) of the vehicle.

35 posted on 08/15/2009 1:00:37 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Enviro’s have made it so that if just 10,000 or so of these vehicles were sold and started recharging off our current grid, it would bring California to it’s knees.

These cars are GREAT, but sorry, they are also a TICKING TIME BOMB.


36 posted on 08/15/2009 1:00:53 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Hitler commissioned the Volkswagen and Obama will commission the Voltwagen. Soon he wills start taking money out of your paycheck for installment payments..oh wait..they already are, but you won’t get the car.


37 posted on 08/15/2009 1:01:02 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I was in high school during the Eisenhower administration and there was an “atoms for peace” program that would have meant virtually unlimited supply of electricity. There was even talk of having unmetered electricity for homes. That would enable electic cars feasable but obviously “atoms for peace” did not pan out just like “operation plowshare”.


38 posted on 08/15/2009 1:03:48 PM PDT by jesseam (Been there and done that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Who’re you gonna believe? Obama or the Laws of Thermodynamics...?


39 posted on 08/15/2009 1:04:18 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56
the GREENIES ARE SCREWING themselves with their shortsightedness.

They don't even want you to be driving a car in the first place. To the greenies, hybrids and electric vehicles are just an intermediate step toward forcing the masses onto "sustainable" modes of transit like bikes and buses.

And just think, once most of the US fleet consists of hybrids, the greens can then argue for banning private automobiles entirely because of all the awful toxic waste created by the batteries.

40 posted on 08/15/2009 1:05:29 PM PDT by bornred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
I don't believe that. There are huge losses involved. Batteries don't just absorb a electron in for every electron out from the charger, and the charger doesn't produce one electron of charging force for every electron comming out of the 120/240v line. And every electron put out from the battery does not go directly towards the forward motion (power=force/time=force.distance/time) of the vehicle.

Do you have any numbers to support your ranting?

41 posted on 08/15/2009 1:05:33 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
As someone else pointed out, just wait until Cap & Trade is implemented. The additional charges on electrical use will make drivers of electric cars somewhat unhappy....

You are living in la la land if you think gas prices won't go up at least as much as electricity prices.

42 posted on 08/15/2009 1:08:01 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

” As someone else pointed out, just wait until Cap & Trade is implemented. “

Ah, but you forgot solar and wind power...

Of course, in order to install enough solar panels and windmills to meet the demand for all of those electric cars that we’re gonna be forced to buy to keep Government Motors open for the Unions, the government would have to utilize every square inch of open space... Since the NIMBY enviros will screech about taking up ‘pristine open space’, the usable open space becomes the rights-of-way for streets, roads, and highways...

Guess we can drive ‘em up and down the driveway.....


43 posted on 08/15/2009 1:08:08 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

How many meters in a mile? 1 kw=.3048m or about 3.3kw roughly per meter. multiply 3.3kw by the number of meters in a mile (1609.344 )=5310.8352kw x60= 318650.112kw per hr


44 posted on 08/15/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

That’s why I figured $5.00/gallon in my initial post....


45 posted on 08/15/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
So after three years you have to pay an additional $5-10K just for the batteries?

No. The batteries will be warranted for at least 10 years. In present Hybrids, there is a surplus of used batteries because there are more wrecked hybrids than battery failures.

46 posted on 08/15/2009 1:13:32 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
I’ll wait until they power the car with a mini nuclear power plant....

The Ford Nucleon

47 posted on 08/15/2009 1:15:00 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Fish rot from the head down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Current hybrids make more sense than the 40 mile per day all electric vehicles....


48 posted on 08/15/2009 1:16:39 PM PDT by freebilly ( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

gm says 10cents per kwh so 318650.112kwh/1000 x.10= $31.60 for 60 miles.


49 posted on 08/15/2009 1:16:43 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
318650.112kw per hr

Meaningless term. I see you are not an engineer.

50 posted on 08/15/2009 1:17:18 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson