Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

A hospital will not reject a woman who may be dying no matter the cause. I would doubt that it would even be legal.

Question: where is there any info about the Tiller Killer that may counter the claims that he was pro-life?


6 posted on 08/15/2009 2:04:15 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob
A hospital will not reject a woman who may be dying no matter the cause. I would doubt that it would even be legal.

No they won't but the state won't give a license to an abortuary (or any other outpatient surgery center) without an agreement with a nearby hospital in case of emergency.

7 posted on 08/15/2009 2:16:20 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: arrogantsob

Of course, the woman would be admitted and/or treated by way of the Emergency Room. But, that is very different from this murderous scumbag having “admitting priveleges” in a formal kind of arrangement. I think it’s a very important distinction. With Tiller, since he already had such priveleges before he went into full-time murder-for-hire, it likely would have required a lawsuit to revoke those priveleges.


8 posted on 08/15/2009 2:18:39 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: arrogantsob
The hospital would stabilize her in the ER and order her to be transferred. That's legal -- ask Michelle Obama.

As to the info you're seeking: Google is your friend. (or try 'Bing'.)

9 posted on 08/15/2009 2:34:16 PM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson