Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Whole Foods approach to health care reform (a rational, workable alternative to Obamacare)
Mackinac Center For Public Policy ^ | 8/16/2009 | John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods

Posted on 08/16/2009 6:11:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, has an excellent op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal outlining his vision for a plan to reform American health care.

While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment.

Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:

• Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs). The combination of high-deductible health insurance and HSAs is one solution that could solve many of our health-care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees’ Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness.

Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan’s costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of worker satisfaction.

• Equalize the tax laws so that that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits. Now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible, but individual health insurance is not. This is unfair.

• Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable.

• Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance by billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual customer preferences and not through special-interest lobbying.

• Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are passed back to us through much higher prices for health care.

• Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost. How many people know the total cost of their last doctor’s visit and how that total breaks down? What other goods or services do we buy without knowing how much they will cost us?

• Enact Medicare reform. We need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and enact reforms that create greater patient empowerment, choice and responsibility.

• Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren’t covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Mackey’s reform proposals are of the type we should like to see from our legislators. They do not fall into the category of reforms that look good while doing nothing, or reforms that are tailored to special interest groups at the expense of patients.

These reforms are real, cost-lowering and patient-protecting ones that would put America on track for expanding coverage, improving care and lowering health care expenditures. Legislators should take notice.

John Mackey also talked about Whole Foods’ high deductible health insurance plan and its advantages with John Stossel in the 2007 20/20 special, Sick in America:

(CLICK ABOVE LINK TO WATCH )


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; ceo; healthcare; mackey; obamacare; wholefoods
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I started this thread so that intelligent FReepers can give their serious proposals as to how we can make our healthcare system better instead of this monstrosity we call Obamacare ( AKA PelosiCare).

You cannot fight something we nothing. You cannot just criticize without proposing something concrete.

The proposals given by the CEO of Whole Foods is a good start. If you disagree with some of his proposals, I'd like to hear your alternatives.

Ideally, we should keep this proposal within 100 pages so that people can read and understand it ( instead of the thousand page monstrosity being rammed down our throats by Congress ).

1 posted on 08/16/2009 6:11:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: long hard slogger; FormerACLUmember; Harrius Magnus; hocndoc; parousia; Hydroshock; skippermd; ...


Socialized Medicine aka Universal Health Care PING LIST

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or removed from this ping list.

**This is a high volume ping list! (sign of the times)**


2 posted on 08/16/2009 6:14:15 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some of what he says is smart but Whole Foods is liberal, over-priced and marginally good so, I’ll take what he says with a grain of salt.


3 posted on 08/16/2009 6:15:36 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
I’ll take what he says with a grain of salt.

Which one of his 8 proposals do you think will make our system worse off ? I'm not interested in his party affiliation, I'm interested in IDEAS and POLICIES regardless of whether the proponent is a GOPer or a Dem.
4 posted on 08/16/2009 6:17:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is, by far, the best laid out plan I have yet seen.

Any chance of this going through? Only in my dreams. OK, now back to the real world. Sigh....


5 posted on 08/16/2009 6:17:39 PM PDT by The Californian (The door to the room of success swings on the hinges of opposition. Bob Jones, Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ideally, we’ll shop at Whole Foods, eat a veggie-based diet, cut down on animal fats, take healthy supplements, exercise daily and NOT NEED much health insurance. Absolutely works for me. And I’m well over 65. Pun intended.


6 posted on 08/16/2009 6:17:57 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My brother and I were talking about this kind of a plan tonight. I have heard of similar plans.


7 posted on 08/16/2009 6:21:42 PM PDT by Chickensoup ("Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Californian
Any chance of this going through? Only in my dreams. OK, now back to the real world. Sigh....

If the GOP wants to win the battle of ideas, they should use this 8 points as a basis for adopting a plan ( similar to the 1994 Contract With America laid out by Newt Gingrich ).

They should then spend money on TV and the papers ADVERTISING it. This is a propaganda battle and if they want to win hearts and minds, they have to give an alternative proposal. YOU CANNOT FIGHT SOMETHING WITH NOTHING.
8 posted on 08/16/2009 6:21:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not much of what he has proposed is new. Every item from high deductible policies to interstate insurance competition to tort reform has been proposed in the past.

And it has gone nowhere.

I don’t propose to have an answer why, but it might be that it is asking politicians on all levels to give up some control and power.


9 posted on 08/16/2009 6:23:38 PM PDT by Comstock1 (So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Comstock1

But, I should add that I like most of what he is saying.


10 posted on 08/16/2009 6:24:35 PM PDT by Comstock1 (So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Close the border, keep it closed, deport illegals and pass tort reform legislation.

Not a cure for spiraling costs but it’s a start.


11 posted on 08/16/2009 6:25:29 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The head of our public charity hospital (Grady) did an interview with a local radio station. He's opposed to health care, but he also had a suggestion.

Most of the '47 million uninsured' seem to show up at Grady, either at the ER or one of their free clinics. His suggestion was to fully fund the clinics and just let them provide health care to the indigent and working poor. They're doing it already anyway, but the cost is being passed on to paying customers, insurance companies, and the local taxpayers.

Anybody see a problem with this? Portable policies and HSAs for most folks, and public clinics for the people who can't afford that.

12 posted on 08/16/2009 6:25:42 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These are the types of measures that make sense and one would expect the Republicrats in Congress would be focusing on implementing instead of the Marxist nationalization of the medical industry being perpetrated by the red sons of bitches in power.


13 posted on 08/16/2009 6:26:44 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Hussein Baraka Mook Kebba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You may be interested in the point number one of the article.


14 posted on 08/16/2009 6:28:21 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In my area, Whole Foods is called “Whole Paycheck”.


15 posted on 08/16/2009 6:28:48 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I didn’t see where he said anything about whole foods in the article. They sounded like good ideas to me.


16 posted on 08/16/2009 6:31:22 PM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bring back the pre-1986 medical deductions where we were allowed to deduct ALL medical expenses, not just the ones over a certain percentage of a persons/family’s gross (or net). As it stands, unless there has been a serious medical condition that year, no one can take advantage of that deduction.

If the deduction were reinstated, people would be more likely to pay for medical services, knowing at least that it would be deductible.


17 posted on 08/16/2009 6:32:00 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Yes: he’s MARKETING to stuck-up libs, giving them what they expect/want, AND making money off of it. Sounds like a capitalist to ME. . .


18 posted on 08/16/2009 6:33:54 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

He may very well be a Leftist, but each of his points are valid, with the possible exception of Medicare reform, as that one is vague.

If each of the others were inacted, our health care ‘problem’ would vanish.


19 posted on 08/16/2009 6:34:27 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Besides FDA and possibly the VA - get the Feds out of health-care completely, including Medicaid/Medicare and removing any tax benefits or penalties for corporate programs, self-insurance, etc..

In a transition period, turn over Fed Money for medicaid/medicare to the States on gradually declining basis over 5 years. Then let individual States decide if they want to raise taxes to maintain similar programs, and have more activist or less activist health-care programs. It would remove the most massive layer of bureaucracy (the Feds), reduce costs, and most important - provide a laboratory of best practices in 50 different states. Speed, adaptability and flexibility to change would also increase.


20 posted on 08/16/2009 6:34:34 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson