Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARLINGTON HAS GRAVE SITUATION
New York Post ^ | August 16, 2009 | JANON FISHER

Posted on 08/16/2009 8:18:33 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

The families of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan are being told to wait -- sometimes two months -- until their loved ones can be buried with full honors in Arlington National Cemetery.

The hallowed memorial site, which handles up to 27 burials a day, is so overwhelmed with the bodies of elderly veterans and young soldiers that families are told they'll have to go without full-honors ceremonies if they want a timely burial, according to a spokesman.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: arlington; arlingtoncemetery; burials; military

1 posted on 08/16/2009 8:18:33 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Ping


2 posted on 08/16/2009 8:24:15 PM PDT by llevrok (As a matter of fact, yes I DO care if Jimmy cracks corn !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I don’t doubt they are overworked. Anyone who has spent much time in Arlington and watched the way they work cannot help but think they are pressed.

They do a great job, but can be viewed as a bottleneck, and it isn’t their fault. There are simply a lot of veterans, guys like my dad passing on, and I do believe it must be peaking.

I wonder if they will consider any short term measures to deal with this spike.


3 posted on 08/16/2009 8:25:27 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

When I visited Arlington in June, 2007, there were four burials taking place simultaneously, or nearly so, close to the interment wall for my friend, a WW II veteran. I have no idea if others were planned for that day but it sure was busy in the two hours I was there.


4 posted on 08/16/2009 8:27:15 PM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

A sad situation, to be sure. You have both the WWII/Korean generation dying off at the same time the current theatre had casualties. Is burial at ANC worth that long a wait? Personally, I’d rather be interred alongside family.


5 posted on 08/16/2009 8:28:28 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (YES WE CAN have a Depression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

One of the comments expands a bit on what the article says:

“I believe that this story requires some measure of clarification:

In January 2009 the Secretary of the Army ordered that all Army Personnel, regardless of rank, should receive full military honors during their burial services at Arlington National Cemetery. However, no additional resourses were added to the Army unit which provides these services at Arlington.”

Out of curiosity, was this a late decision in the Bush administration, or an early decision in the Obama administration? Does anyone know?


6 posted on 08/16/2009 8:29:12 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

For this to happen to our veterans and the families of veterans, this is a national disgrace.

I wonder if anything like this happened during the Bush years beside the Veterans Hospital debacle that is (I doubt it).

All veterans and all veteran organizations should be breathing down the neck of the administration over this until the problem is corrected. If they need to hire more or to commandeer soldiers from other states if necessary to get the job done then so be it but this should not be happening especially to our veterans and our veterans families, not in this country. Not now, not ever.


7 posted on 08/16/2009 8:30:56 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
This is a symptom of our military cutbacks. Lots of WW-II and Korean veterans are passing on, and not a few from Vietnam as well, but the military is so cut back compared to what it was, say towards the end of the Reagan administration, there are not enough soldiers to spare, or to volunteer, for honor guard duty. Add in the relatively small numbers of troops being killed in the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and you've got a real shortage of folks to do honor guard duties.

My father in law, who passed about 2 1/2 years ago, was a WW-II USAAF veteran. The Army sent one soldier, they might have sent two, except that his oldest grandson, a newly promoted SFC in the Army Reserve, claimed the honor. He had been a volunteer honor guard in Hawaii when he was on active duty so knew the drill. The American Legion and the VFW, FIL was member of both, each sent one guy, one of them had the electronic bugle/trumpet for "Taps".

8 posted on 08/16/2009 8:32:39 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

My father fought in the Korean War. I’m tempted to show him this article but at the same time it may evoke unpleasant memories and thoughts. My brother took him to DC a few years back and I am told he (dad) broke down at the Korean War memorial. And he is among the least emotional people I have met.


9 posted on 08/16/2009 8:35:28 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09".... um, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Maybe the need to start calling up the old vets and drafting them into honor guard duty.


10 posted on 08/16/2009 8:35:35 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

IMHO, those killed in the line of duty should be interred first. If there is any waiting, those retired and separated vets who have died natural deaths should be the ones waiting. And forget RHIP!


11 posted on 08/16/2009 8:38:19 PM PDT by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
There is also a space problem at Arlington [and other Veterans' Cemeteries].
12 posted on 08/16/2009 8:43:03 PM PDT by Daffynition ("...... we are about to be czarred and fettered." ~ alterum ictum faciam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

I think they should remedy this by giving preference to all Active Duty casualties, and I mean immediate preference.

When my dad was buried, If someone had told my family we would have to delay days, weeks or even months, I think we would readily agree.

This is a peak in activity. There must be a way to remedy this. I did not hear the rules had been changed by the Army in this fashion. I think that was a bad decision. I can’t believe whoever decided on that got signoff from people who understood the dynamics.

I too would be interested in how that decision was made and by whom.


13 posted on 08/16/2009 8:48:31 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
They should have chose another spot for the cemetery instead of the Lee Mansion and grounds by that spiteful drunken Grant.
14 posted on 08/16/2009 8:52:19 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Even before the backlog - vets were receiving a counterfeit service - with many having a recording of taps being played on a digital bugle...

If we can’t even bury our vets with the honors they deserve, then something is very wrong. Hello - how about adding some personnel... Oh, wait - that would take an act of congress...or so one would think.


15 posted on 08/16/2009 8:55:45 PM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

They should have chose another spot for the cemetery instead of the Lee Mansion and grounds by that spiteful drunken Grant.

***

Get your facts straight ...

It was Quartermaster General Meigs who recommended that Arlington be used as a cemetery.


16 posted on 08/16/2009 9:08:15 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687
When I visited Arlington in June, 2007, there were four burials taking place simultaneously

When I served with the USAF Honor Guard (1963-1967) We had 3 to 5 burials a day, 5 days a week in Arlington. That was just the USAF, the army, navy, marines and coast guard had their own. All of this before the V.N. war got really hot.

17 posted on 08/16/2009 9:11:49 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687

I mis spoke (it’s been a long time ago), the average was probably more like 1 -3 per day (USAF)


18 posted on 08/16/2009 9:13:49 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan; All

My grandparents, Dad, and an uncle are buried there ...

I am local and take my Mom all the time to the graves ...

We were there about a month ago and there were at least 6 funerals going simultaneously (3 with full honors - band, horses & catafalque, pall bearers, rifle squad, and trumpeter).

6 at a time is very doable - if you don’t go for full honors (pall bearers, rifle squad, and trumpeter only).

But, if you put the band and horses and catafalque in the mix - you are creating a logistical nightmare ...

Not enuf horses or bands ...


19 posted on 08/16/2009 9:15:43 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
My last visit, I walked from a hotel in Georgetown to the cemetery, in the middle of February. I wasn't sure of the distance, I just wanted to get there in the couple of days I visited the area.
20 posted on 08/16/2009 9:23:12 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09".... um, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
My dad (WW2...German POW)and Mom are in the Columbarium. It took about 2 months to schedule each interment. My dad's had the band, catafalque, etc. My mom's was a dignified ceremony at my dad's niche with a minister only. They do know how to be respectful of those who gave for their country.
21 posted on 08/16/2009 9:37:03 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
Get your facts straight ...

It was Quartermaster General Meigs who recommended that Arlington be used as a cemetery.

OK Grant was his boss and who masterminded the Rose Garden interment? Just so Lee would not come back to his property.

22 posted on 08/16/2009 9:41:03 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I would like to thank your father for his service to this country.


23 posted on 08/16/2009 9:45:21 PM PDT by packrat35 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.- M Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I really don’t think that this has to do with cutbacks but, it might be so...

There is a limited availability of burial spots and the military has a limited number of burials per day...


24 posted on 08/16/2009 9:50:22 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

OK Grant was his boss and who masterminded the Rose Garden interment? Just so Lee would not come back to his property.

***

Meigs wrote to Secretary of War Edwin Stanton suggesting that Robert E. Lee’s estate Arlington, which had been confiscated by the Federal government, be used for a military cemetery. “The grounds about the mansion are admirably adapted to such a use,” Meigs wrote on 15 June 1864. That same day, Stanton informed Meigs that he would allot 200 acres of the estate as burial ground.

In August 1864, twenty-six men were buried around Mrs. Lee’s rose garden.

Who masterminded the Rose Garden interments ???

Probably Meigs himself - he had a HUGE hatred of the South and Robert E. Lee, although he had served under and admired Lee prior to the war.

He considered Lee a traitor ...


25 posted on 08/16/2009 10:34:39 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
There is a limited availability of burial spots and the military has a limited number of burials per day...

0bama could spend a small part of the stimulus money to solve this problem.

Of course he won't do it, he is still too busy using that money to repay his campaign contributors in the United States and all that foreign money he received.

26 posted on 08/16/2009 11:06:37 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

“My dad (WW2...German POW)and Mom are in the Columbarium. It took about 2 months to schedule each interment. My dad’s had the band, catafalque, etc. My mom’s was a dignified ceremony at my dad’s niche with a minister only. They do know how to be respectful of those who gave for their country.”

Similar for my dad. 3 war vet, WWII Africa/Germany POW, Korea, VN/Cambodia advisor. It took 2 months to get his ashes buried at Arlington, but they did the whole thing. Horse-drawn carriage with the polished wood box with his ashes, bugler, and salute. The minister happened to be the Chaplain for my cousin’s Maryland Guard unit. I was chosen to receive the flag, which I consider to be quite an honor. The absolute precision with which they carry out the rites and honors is amazing.
The whole ceremony took about half an hour from our leaving the reception center to our return there. The minister told us a bit about the men who serve as the honor guard and what it takes to be one of them. Also told us how many times a day they do what they do. At the time, it was 4 times a day, and that was before the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
The little brochure about Arlington that they gave me was very interesting. All graves there are the same, officers and enlisted lie side-by-side. Each service branch “takes care of its own”.


27 posted on 08/17/2009 1:43:30 AM PDT by Mr Inviso (ACORN=Arrogant Condescending Obama Ruining Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687
The National Geographic Channel had a special Arlington: Field of Honor, in which they showed some of the hustle and bustle that was going on. The director of operations was having to coordinate multiple funerals at the same time, including one for an MIA from Vietnam who had finally returned home and for a Special Forces officer who had just been killed in Afghanistan. It was amazing the detail they went to in setting up these ceremonies.
28 posted on 08/17/2009 1:53:54 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Put your trust in God; but mind to keep your powder dry. - Oliver Cromwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
... beside the Veterans Hospital debacle that is ...

Please clarify that. I must have missed it. What VA Hospital and when?

29 posted on 08/17/2009 6:41:49 AM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
“Meigs wrote to Secretary of War Edwin Stanton suggesting that Robert E. Lee’s estate Arlington, which had been confiscated by the Federal government, be used for a military cemetery. “The grounds about the mansion are admirably adapted to such a use,” Meigs wrote on 15 June 1864. That same day, Stanton informed Meigs that he would allot 200 acres of the estate as burial ground.

In August 1864, twenty-six men were buried around Mrs. Lee’s rose garden.

Who masterminded the Rose Garden interments ???

Probably Meigs himself - he had a HUGE hatred of the South and Robert E. Lee, although he had served under and admired Lee prior to the war.

He considered Lee a traitor ...”

that is one account I heard, But here are others and nothing happened that Grant did not want to happen! including Sherman's atrocities.

30 posted on 08/17/2009 7:09:01 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Thank you.


31 posted on 08/17/2009 7:19:59 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09".... um, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
I really don’t think that this has to do with cutbacks but, it might be so... There is a limited availability of burial spots and the military has a limited number of burials per day...

Maybe not at Arlington, where the limiting factor might be availability of grave sites and the desire to have each funeral be quasi private.

However the lack of honor guards for the much larger population being burried at other National Cemeteries (Like the "Punch Bowl in Hawaii or Ft. Sam Houston in San Antonio) or at the various State Veterans Cemeteries (There's a fairly new one adjacent to Fort Hood, where my coworkers' husband remains lie), or even in other non veteran's cemetaries, is a direct result of the much diminshed numbers in the armed forces, all services and componenents.

32 posted on 08/17/2009 4:13:00 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson