Posted on 08/18/2009 1:36:41 PM PDT by Casaubon
Cointelpro II? Are the same parties complaining?
LOL! Epic stuff! ;-)
Unfortunately, that’s pretty much the whole story. I did not attend any other meetings with this group nor talk to the guy at work about this. I left the meeting pretty quickly after it was over, but I did watch the “informant” as I was leaving and I did not see anybody approach him.
This meeting was only advertised through word of mouth, but since it was before the Tea Parties, I can see where it might have raised suspicion with law enforcement. It was held in a meeting room at the public library so it was no secret.
Thanks. It really does sound odd.
Don’t know just why the Feebs ushered him out, but looks like he began taking his persona seriously. Something to be said for the ethics of this, or lack thereof.
He was posting locations of people who were expected to be hated by “right wing nuts.” I wonder what these people ever thought about that themselves? Thanks to services like Google and the Wayback Machine, blog posts never really die.
If you feel it,it is.I once had a meeting that a police man and woman attended.They asked me who I voted for and I told them we were there to pray.If you have open meetings people float around.
63 year old grandmother of multi racial children who whants a future for them = right wing extremist.
toobin
...ducking...
Lol...
I guess the “warning” here is “Do not radicalize” and do not trust anyone who appears to be radical in their thoughts and actions.
Hmmm... I wonder who benefits from this particular scare tactic...
Ignore sh-t like this, our ONLY hope is radicalization and the marxist f’ers know it. This is simple psyop 101...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.