Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Busting the Filibuster
The Nation ^ | August 12, 2009 | Thomas Geoghegan

Posted on 08/19/2009 5:08:27 PM PDT by XHogPilot

This past spring, Senator Claire McCaskill wrote to me asking for $50 to help elect more Democrats, so we could have a filibuster-proof Senate. Now that Al Franken has finally been declared the sixtieth Democratic senator, her plea may seem moot. But even with Franken in office, we don't have a filibuster-proof Senate. To get to sixty on the Democratic side, we'll still have to cut deals.

Maybe we should start sending postcards like the following: "Dear Senator: Why do you keep asking for my money? You've already got the fifty-one votes you need to get rid of the filibuster rule."

The post-1975 procedural filibuster is entirely unlike the old filibuster, the one Mr. Smith, as played by the unshaven Jimmy Stewart, stayed up all night to mount in his plea for honest government.

The old filibuster is extinct. No one has stood up and read recipes for Campbell's Soup for decades. In 1975 Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, in his role as president of the Senate, ruled that just fifty-one senators could vote to get rid of the filibuster entirely. A simple majority of liberals could now force change. But instead of dumping the filibuster once and for all, the liberals, unsure of their support, agreed to a "reformed" Rule 22. It was this reform that, by accident, turned the once-in-a-blue-moon filibuster into something that happens all the time. The idea was to reduce the votes needed to cut off debate from sixty-seven, which on the Hill is a big hill to climb, to just sixty.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenation.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; filibuster; reid; senate; senator; supermajority
Something to think about. Is this what's coming next?
1 posted on 08/19/2009 5:08:27 PM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
Is this what's coming next?

You can bet your bippy!

2 posted on 08/19/2009 5:10:59 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Democrats have no shame. But if they do pull this crap, there will soon be 60 GOP senators.


3 posted on 08/19/2009 5:13:52 PM PDT by Always Right (It is not the Townhall crowds that are manufactured, but the Health Care Crisis that is manufactured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Liberals came up with the new-and-improved polite filibuster in 1975 and it blew up in their faces, and with Blue Dogs from conservative states it promises to be a headache for Obamunism.


4 posted on 08/19/2009 5:16:27 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (59 million Americans joined hands and shouted, "Yes, We Can March off This Cliff!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
The MSM threw a hissy fit when the GOP just thought about doing this over judicial nominees. I'm sure that's down the memory hole as it's the Dims who want to do it now.
5 posted on 08/19/2009 5:20:55 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Watch out, I'm a member of the Mob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

They’ll have to wheel in Kennedy and Byrd to get their votes.


6 posted on 08/19/2009 5:22:30 PM PDT by manic4organic (We Are S0 Screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
The problem with the filibuster is not so much that it puts Republicans in control but that it puts senators from conservative regions like the South, the border states and the Great Plains in control. The only true filibuster-proof Senate would be a majority that would be proof against those regions.

We know better than you redneck trash!

7 posted on 08/19/2009 5:33:36 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (Idiotcracy has arrived 400 years early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

“it puts senators from conservative regions like the South, the border states and the Great Plains in control”

In other words, it puts racists in control. What did we fight the Civil War for, anyway, if this can be allowed to go on? (/s)


8 posted on 08/19/2009 5:46:06 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Democrats have no shame. But if they do pull this crap, there will soon be 60 GOP senators.

There will have to be, because if they lose their majority, their last act in the Senate before the next term majority GOP gets seated will be to go back to the old filibuster rule requiring 60 votes for cloture. Like you said, they have no shame.

9 posted on 08/19/2009 5:52:32 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
They just fillibustered a CCW bill in the senate the other day. The press wrote the story like it was defeated cleanly. Democrats are commmunists. They don't have to be consistent.
10 posted on 08/19/2009 8:03:01 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson