Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Methodists Say No to Lutheran Gay Clergy
Christian Post ^ | 8/27/2009 | Lillian Kwon

Posted on 08/27/2009 9:36:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Lutheran ministers who are in same-sex relationships will not be allowed to serve as clergy in United Methodist congregations despite the new full communion agreement between the two denominations.

Bishop Gregory Palmer, president of the United Methodist Council of Bishops, made clear on Wednesday that UMC's ban on noncelibate gay clergy still stands.

"Our Book of Discipline on that subject did not become null and void when they took that vote," said Palmer, according to the United Methodist News Service. "It still applies to United Methodist clergy."

Palmer was referring to the highly publicized vote last week by the chief legislative body of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America to approve a resolution allowing gays and lesbians in "life-long, monogamous, same gender relationships" to be ordained.

The controversial vote took place a day after ELCA delegates overwhelmingly adopted a full communion agreement with The United Methodist Church.

Full communion is not tantamount to a merger, church officials said. Instead, under the pact each church acknowledges the other as a partner in the Christian faith, recognizes the authenticity of each other's baptism and Eucharist, and is committed to working together toward greater unity.

The two denominations also express mutual recognition of ordained ministers for service in either church, according to the agreement. Some UMC leaders have already expressed eagerness to share clergy in underserved areas, as reported by the United Methodist News Service.

Although the agreement recognizes full interchangeability of all ordained ministers, UMC congregations will not be accepting partnered homosexuals from the ELCA.

As Palmer stressed, "the doctrine, polity and standards of ministry of the respective denominations in any full communion agreement are not wiped out when one denomination does something."

Last year, the highest legislative body of The United Methodist Church rejected changes to its constitution and voted to uphold its ban against the ordination of practicing homosexuals. United Methodists continue to hold that homosexual practice is "incompatible with Christian teaching."

Michael Trice, an ecumenical officer of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, noted that if partnered homosexuals in the ELCA want to serve in a United Methodist congregation, The United Methodist Church can say to them "we are sorry but that does not fit our protocols."

"Unity does not require uniformity in all cases," said Trice. "It requires faithfulness to the Gospel, honesty with our Christian partners, and wherever we can share a sense of mission and service in the world."

The agreement with the ELCA is UMC's first full communion relationship outside the Methodist tradition. The ELCA, meanwhile, has full communion pacts with The Episcopal Church, Moravian Church in America, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), Reformed Church in America and the United Church of Christ.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elca; gay; homosexualagenda; homosexualclergy; homosexuality; keepowt; lutheran; methodists; nothanks; religiousleft; umc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2009 9:36:45 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I really, really wish they would drop the word Lutheran from their name. Marty would have a thing or two to say to these heathen...


2 posted on 08/27/2009 9:38:47 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Maybe homosexuals should set up their own church. Then, they can serve the Lord as they see fit and not challenge or damage the faith of other Christians who find solace in scripture. If they were serious about the Christian ministry, they would do this and stop harassing their brothers and sisters. How can they think this constant dissent ion and challenge to structure is serving the Kingdom of G-d? Its' not. Its the devil working overtime by using "those of a seared conscience" to destroy the church.

The good news is that the Universal Church is doing exceptionally well these days, unlike those "denominations" who have drifted off message...

3 posted on 08/27/2009 9:43:14 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

You’d think that would be a good idea that the homosexuals would embrace. Unfortunately, serving God is not the real agenda. Destroying Christianity is.


4 posted on 08/27/2009 9:48:08 AM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

That’s the best idea yet. But it will never happen. The militant gay community is not interested in serving God. They are interested in absolving themselves from all guilt (falsely!) by trying to force changes in church doctrine to accomodate them. They are concentrating on things of the world, not the Word of God. (IMO, for what little it’s worth).


5 posted on 08/27/2009 9:49:56 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chesley
BINGO! This has nothing to do with Jesus, except to destroy his church.
6 posted on 08/27/2009 9:50:30 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bishop Gregory Palmer, president of the United Methodist Council of Bishops, made clear on Wednesday that UMC's ban on noncelibate gay clergy still stands.

But apparently it's OK for UMC for celibate gay clergy. What hogwash! UMC left Christ decades ago.

7 posted on 08/27/2009 9:52:51 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley
Unfortunately, serving God is not the real agenda. Destroying Christianity is.

Yep. By their fruits shall ye know them...

8 posted on 08/27/2009 9:53:08 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greatplains
"This people honors me only with lip-service, while their hearts are far from me. The worship they offer me is worthless; the doctrines they teach are only human regulations." (Matt.15:8-9).
9 posted on 08/27/2009 10:00:22 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: greatplains
It would never occur to Christians to walk into a synagogue or mosque and begin causing trouble and taking over the place because they aren't doing it the way WE want it done. Similarly, the Methodists don't walk into Lutheran churches with demands of “change.” How, then, can this rag tag bunch cause so much trouble in a 2,000 year old institution? Answer... church leadership has forgotten the mission. They let it happen because they are afraid of conflict. They are ashamed of Christ. Christ told us we can expect trouble: “for they hated me first...”The Church is not a social agency. Its a ministry to share the good news of salvation with all mankind. Even gays.
10 posted on 08/27/2009 10:03:39 AM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
But apparently it's OK for UMC for celibate gay clergy.

Just wanted to know --- is it wrong to accept CELIBATE GAY's into church membership ?
11 posted on 08/27/2009 10:27:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When the Methodists start being more conservative than Lutherans, you know that things have hit the theological bottom. I, too, wish that the ELCA would change its name. There is NOTHING Lutheran about the ELCA. The question is whether or not it is still Christian. It is certainly an apostate denomination, but it has been that from its conception. Why in God’s Name would any Christian belong to this heretical church body is the question that each member of the ELCA has to answer for himself.


12 posted on 08/27/2009 11:25:19 AM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Just wanted to know --- is it wrong to accept CELIBATE GAY's into church membership

Nice liberal try. The article's focus is upon pastors, not membership. There's no excuse for allowing gay pastors, celibate or not.

In Romans 1, it is explained that God gives people up to homosexuality as a form of judgment. Church membership implies the individual has come back to God as a sinner (which we all are) and has put their faith in Christ's work, and has repented of their sin. A repentant Christian will no longer identify themselves as a 'gay' or an adulterer or a murderer. To do so it just another liberal method to slither their immorality into the church.

13 posted on 08/27/2009 2:55:51 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
Nice liberal try. The article's focus is upon pastors, not membership. There's no excuse for allowing gay pastors, celibate or not.

Actually the question is not conservative or liberal --- it's a relevant one.

Since you want to focus on the pastor, let's do it. Is it your contention that a pastor should never ever be tempted by any form of sin ( be it homosexual or heterossexual or material or even pride ) ?

As for this --- A repentant Christian will no longer identify themselves as a 'gay' or an adulterer or a murderer

Pastoral candidates who are committed to their faith should not identify themselves with any of the above, I agree, but my question is this --- should their sexual inclinations even be part of the questions a pastoral search committee should ask ? Or should a 'Don't ask don't tell' policy be in place ?
14 posted on 08/29/2009 8:04:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Since you want to focus on the pastor, let's do it.

The article focused on the pastor. When it comes to a position of spiritual authority, it's not just a matter of commitment to to their faith, it's a matter of living out their faith - leading by example. The qualifications for a pastor are given twice in scripture. One qualification is that the pastor must be the husband of one wife. Homosexuality doesn't fit the qualifications, period.

15 posted on 08/29/2009 3:10:18 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
it's a matter of living out their faith - leading by example. The qualifications for a pastor are given twice in scripture. One qualification is that the pastor must be the husband of one wife. Homosexuality doesn't fit the qualifications, period.

1) Must the pastor be married ? I do not understand the above statement to mean that marriage is an absolute qualification for pastorship.

2) If the pastor has homosexual tendencies but DOES NOT ACT ON IT, and remains celibate and abstinent, I do not see how that isn't living their faith out. He is FIGHTING temptation and overcoming it.
16 posted on 08/29/2009 3:15:26 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"An Overseer (pastor) then must be blameless, the husband of one wife,.." 1 Tim 3

"For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you— if a man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of dissipation or insubordination." Titus 1.

The language of scripture is pretty clear. Frequently ignored, but straight forward.

17 posted on 08/29/2009 3:23:43 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
An Overseer (pastor) then must be blameless, the husband of one wife,..

Well, John Stott was the Pastor of ALL SOUL's CHURCH in England for many years. He was NEVER MARRIED ( not the husband of one wife ). Should he have been disqualified because he is single ? What about St. Paul ? Who was not married ?

So my conclusion is this -- if he remains CELIBATE, he is BLAMELESS ( at least in the area of sexual sin ). That means he should be qualified to serve.
18 posted on 08/29/2009 3:42:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So my conclusion is this -- if he remains CELIBATE, he is BLAMELESS ( at least in the area of sexual sin ). That means he should be qualified to serve.

So you choose a personal experience over scripture. This is the same reasoning that leads to gay pastors.

I'll obey God's word. His commands are clear. Disobeyed, excused, but clear.

19 posted on 08/29/2009 4:31:06 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
So you choose a personal experience over scripture

How did he violate scripture ? Did he lie with a man ? If he did not commit the act, where is the violation ?
20 posted on 08/29/2009 4:53:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson