"UNITED IN HATE" -- RESPECTED SCHOLAR REVEALS LEFTIST "DEIFICATION" OF TOTALITARIAN IDEOLOGIES

Why does the leftist believer reach out in solidarity to the most gay-hating, womanhating and minority-hating force on earth?

I would just point out that Moslems are not gay-hating.

[All they got wrong was which shill they would put in office first. Don't count Hillary out. If the Shadow People decide Obama is expendable and blame it on "right wingers," she'll flap out of her cave like a bat on bugs at sundown.]

United In Hate by Dr. Jamie Glazov — a review
United In Hate — The Left’s Romance With Tyranny and Terror is a book that examines the seamy underbelly of the radical Left which considers Western society and its values an anathema. Dr. Jamie Glazov, the Managing Editor of FrontPage Magazine, methodically details the causational factors that have lead modern Leftists to adhere to the death and destruction mantra of tyrannical Islamic Jihadists.

The Twin Towers are destroyed, 2973 people die in the attack and the radical Left cheers; the war in Iraq is won and the Left expels a disgusted sigh; totalitarian thugs kill innocent millions that the Left justifies as a “cleansing” required to forge a utopian society; suicidal Jihadists shred shoppers in malls with nail bombs and are excused by the Left as door-matted victims striking back at their oppressors; women are vilified, stoned, mutilated and killed by radical Muslims as Leftist feminists remain silent, save here in America where they rail mightily against a country club that’s denied membership to a female executive.

What draws Leftists moth-like toward the annihilating fires of unbridled totalitarianism, or drives them to slavishly worship at the feet of dictators that kick them to the curb when they are considered no longer useful? Why does the Left cleave to a radical Islamic terrorism that vows to destroy all non-believers, including them? Dr. Glazov answers these and other “head scratching” questions in a court-ready presentation of the Left’s mindset that will make forensic psychologists proud.

The Left’s hatred and rejection of Western civilization, its freedoms and values, begins with an acute sense of alienation from it, and unable to “fit in” the Left believes radical societal change, regardless of the consequences, is necessary. After all it’s the West’s fault that the Left has no sense of purpose or direction. Although the Left vehemently argues against this premise, its words and actions prove Dr. Glazov’s case.

The ideological descendents of the communist/progressive Left that spent its capital hoping the West would lose the Cold War to the Soviet Union are today’s leftist core. Based on their hatred for the United States, the Left has forged a symbiotic relationship with radical Islam, whose hatred for America equals theirs. Both make it clear that they consider Western civilization evil and unworthy of preservation. Violent revolution is the Left’s path to change; the Jihadists’ follow the path of war and annilation.

Some might think Dr. Glazov has taken a wrong turn in his analysis of the radical Left’s agenda and beliefs. If so, they should read the scurrilous quotes of Michael Moore extolling the virtues of the “Iraqi freedom fighters,” or Ward Churchill’s and Jeremiah Wright’s crowing after 9/11 that “America’s chickens have come home to roost.” Or, they should examine the genuflexing before the world’s tyrants by the likes of Jimmy Carter, Sean Penn and Tom Hayden. Dr. Glazov’s take on the radical Left is correct and as sharp as a tightly focused laser.

Should the book cause even one radical Leftist to re-examine his or her contorted beliefs and return from the “dark side,” Dr. Glazov’s efforts will be a resounding success. A great thought provoking read!

Ben R. Furman
Former FBI Counterterrorism Chief
www.blackhawkpress.com/blog

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1212925221746&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah/LSELayout

Point number 5: http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons_why_sharia_is.html

Informative academic article: http://www.religionfacts.com/homosexuality/islam.htm

A proper muslim hates abyone who goes to a mosque which preaches something just silghtly diferent from what he is taught in his mosque.

A Comparative Tale of Two Religions
Christian vs. Christian
A man was despondent. His life seemed worthless. He decided to end it all and climbed up onto a bridge railing high above a raging river.
Just as he was leaning forward to make his final plunge, a man happened by and said, "Wait. Let me help you."
“How can you help me? My life is over?"
"Are you a Christian, Jew, Hindu or Muslim?"
"A Christian"
"So am I! What denomination are you?"
"I used to be a Catholic, but have not been to mass in decades."
"I’m a Protestant. Let me help you find your way back to life." "What can you possibly tell me?"
"I can tell you that Jesus loves you and for His sake and His love of you, you cannot take your life. There is so much more to live for."
"Like what?"
"Children."
"I don’t have any."
"Neither do I. But there are still children in need of adults to guide them. Would you deny some child your wisdom and experience?"
"No, of course not!"
"Then step back and come with me."
So the two men walked off.
Muslims vs. Muslim
Far away in a distant land, another man stood on a different bridge.
A man was walking across a bridge one day, and he saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump off and commit suicide.
He immediately ran over and said, "Stop! Don’t do it!"
"Why shouldn’t I?" the other replied.
The man said, "Well, there’s so much to live for!"
"Like what?"
"Well… are you religious or atheist?"
"Religious."
"Me too! Are you Muslim, Christian or Jewish?"
"Muslim."
"Me too! Sunni or Shi’ite?"
"Sunni." "
Me too! Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi or Maliki?"
"Hanafi."
"Wow! Me too! Do you follow Sheikh Fulaan al-Fullani or Sheikh Kaza Kazah?"
"Sheikh Fulaan al-Fullani."
To which the first man said, "What?!! Die, heretic scum!" and pushed him off.

From: Spengler’s The Devil’s Sourdough and The Decline of Nations

Any fool who says this is just alarmists crying; had better wake up quick.

I really do believe that they played their hand too soon. What is happening was not supposed too.

Congress was to take August off and relax and enjoy a peaceful month basking in comfort knowing they had health care in the bag.

Zero and his auto czar tried to buy the US auto makers but did not get Ford whom flourished and buyers flocked to them. The cash for clunkers was a huge success. YES, Ford and many Japanese auto makes made out like bandits. Did GM or Chrysler? No, for reasons stated above. Now the auto Sellers are feeling the pain, I guess that's the price you pay for selling the wrong make.

Cap and Trade is all but dead. They could not even convince the Indians, and what the heck is happening, global cooling was not supposed to happen either. Climate Change. No one is buying it really because in the middle of an unstoppable meltdown, it froze.

Now he is talking about taking over free speech and radio in general. Not real sure how this is going to go. Because most people like have the right to choose to NOT listen to something, without being told they can't. That's not even considering those who like to listen to what ever they like!!!

No, though zero has been anything but transparent in a number of ways; his actions and motives have beenclearly sen and understood for what they are. His moronic sadistic radicals that he surrounds himself with are being shown for what they are by the likes of Rush and Glenn.

And all of this is happening while the MSN have been painting pretty pictures of zero and singing praises in the sunlight. How did this happen? One might ask, how come the one lost his shine? They picked the wrong guy. They picked someone without a history beyond a year or two in the senate. His historic win though sounding monumental wasn't. He just scraped in, but he is going to lose and his party also in a mountain slide in ‘10. He knows it and so do they.

People, the next few months is going to be very interesting. I would not miss it for anything.

Bookmark

Beck is doing a great job and saying what other are thinking ....also trying his best to make us aware of what is going on....both parties are cloaked in secrecy and only pay lip service to the people.....
why else would they pass bills we dont want and when we protest say we are getting them anyway? They dont seem worried at all about preserving this country, our constitution or the citizens in it. what kind of men and women spend a country into this kind of mess...and believe me thats just what happened.

They picked the wrong guy. They picked someone without a history beyond a year or two in the senate. His historic win though sounding monumental wasn't. He just scraped in, but he is going to lose and his party also in a mountain slide in ‘10. He knows it and so do they.

Not only that, they picked him over their Queen, who only had to stumble through the door of the White House to get there.

Yet they kept all the Queen's men, who are now the deranged power behind the narcissistic throne.

Interesting, what?

Really? Ahmadinjad says he country doesn’t have any gays. They kill them.

The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror
Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for “homosexual” in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtId=25196

Judaism’s Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism Rejected Homosexuality
When Judaism demanded that all sexual activity be channeled into marriage, it changed the world. The Torah’s prohibition of non-marital sex quite simply made the creation of Western civilization possible.
http://catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/ho0003.html

The Shadow People (too polite a name for who they really are) have been at this intensely for decades. They are serious about enslaving us.

Notice two points out of the many in this amazing treasonous letter from Ted Kennedy to Chairman Andropov of the USSR in 1983. (It is completely authentic and surfaced in London in the 1990s after KGB files came to light.) Kennedy was setting things up to undermine President Reagan.

Note: (1) Kennedy's secret messenger Tunney (Kennedy's former college roommate, later a Democrat Senator from California) told the Soviets that, quote: "A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984 [when Kennedy planned to run again for President], which would benefit the Democratic party." Economic crisis that would "benefit the Democratic party"??? It took them longer than they hoped, since Reagan was so effective, but does this sound familiar??? Who are these "members of financial circles" and the "hidden tendencies" ... Soros and pals???

Note: Kennedy actually warns the Soviets that Reagan has been successful because his "domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline." Just like the Leftist free-market-haters. Amazing. Naturally, as in the preceding point, the Democrats prosper when the rest of America is on the economic ropes!!! (For one thing, it keeps their voter base of uneducated, unemployed to keep their big chip-on-the-shoulder.)

Note: Kennedy offers the point that he can be very effective among the "political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress" to resist the fact that "growing [American] military expenditures is gaining strength." (If Kennedy had prevailed, we would NEVER have been able to bring down the Berlin Wall and stop 50 years of Soviet violence and tyranny.)

Note: Kennedy's message emphasizes that Kennedy offers to go into secret discussions with the Soviets "to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA" (this is absolutely in violation of the law for anybody but the President to conduct foreign relations). AND Kennedy emphasizes that he will then make arrangements for the Soviets to manipulate the American press but "underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side." Kennedy notes that he can help the Soviet Premier and former KGB Director "to influence Americans" with "television interviews" and "mass media."

"Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow." (Can anybody seriously doubt that Internal American Leftists have been at work in the American mass media for decades???)

THE TED KENNEDY LETTER: This letter which details Senator Edward Kennedy's offer to help the Soviet Union defeat Reagan's efforts to build up the nuclear deterrent in Europe was unearthed by a Times of London reporter in the 1990s after the KGB files were opened. It got little or no attention, however, until the publication of Paul Kengor's book "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism." But even then the actual text of the letter (which is in the book's appendix pp 317-320) has gotten short shrift:

TEXT OF KGB LETTER ON SENATOR TED KENNEDY OFFERS

Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV
Moscow

Regarding Senator Kennedy's request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov,

On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy's close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan's belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President's refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the "success of Reaganomics."

Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan's plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.

The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistence to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.

However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan's adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will be grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.

Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England's Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.

Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA. (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and published a book on the theme as well.)

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attact a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan's administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutal understandings between peoples.

The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.

Having conveyed Kennedy's appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committee
V. Chebrikov

===========

TED KENNEDY PLAY BOOK = OBAMA PLAY BOOK (with some Islamist and racist updates).

THE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO TRASH THE CONSTITUTION HAVE BEEN AT IT FOR DECADES.

WE MUST ACT -- DECISIVELY -- NOW.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScuSTUAc31I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNJxa5QEo1I&feature=related

I would like to point out the EXTENSIVE evidence to the contrary:

KORAN and related Islamic writings.

"Gay Iraqi men are being murdered in what appears to be a brutal coordinated campaign involving militia forces, the group Human Rights Watch says."

Gay conservatives criticize Obama for ignoring plight of gays in Iran.

And so many other references, I wonder if you are talking about the same Islam I'm talking about. I'm talking about the one that's the "Religion of Peace" that believes in using handy kitchen utensils to saw off a Jew's head for broadcast on television news or committing mass murder of men, women and children.

George Washington would have taken Edward Kennedy out and shot him before a firing squad.