The judge has already denied the TRO. The order is available on PACER, which I checked after seeing it reported on Twitter this morning.
Not good.
Is this guy a FReeper?
Anyway, kudos to him!
Captain Obvious says she’ll be getting new orders very soon.
A court-martial would be appropriate.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2327809/posts
I would agree with him, it's all about Barry's born with dual citizenship.
Rider up, here we go again.
obumpa
Official Obama story continues to unravel Girlfriend places mother in Seattle in August 1961
Simple solution for SECDEF and Obama. Revoke her orders. That was easy.
Why did this thread die? The affidavit will outlive the law suit. Is the copy of the BC real or not?
Notarized statement from Cpt Connie rhodes MD, attesting to the fact that she was forbidden to leave the base and appear in court
"Notarized statement from cpt Connie Rhodes MD, attesting to the fact that her commanding officer Col Jeffrey Johnson has forbidden her from leaving the base to appear in court."
CPT Rhodes's Motion for TRO has been denied:
"September 15, 2009
Orly Taitz accused of suborning perjury for Barnett v. Obama -- updated including affidavit, etc.
This is the breaking news mentioned last night in Investigating Obama and The Awakening. Below is a post by Larry Sinclair, from his blog, "...on all things Obama," about what he indicates he was asked by Dr. Taitz, to do.
[snip]
Later today I will be faxing to the United States District Court in Santa Ana, California as well as to the U.S. Attorney's Office an Affidavit informing Judge Carter that on September 7, 2009 Orly Taitz did knowingly and intentionally ask me to appear before his Court on September 8, 2009 and give knowingly false testimony for the purpose of obtaining "expedited discovery," and to gain publicity for my book."
BRIEF Request for stay of deployment pending motion for reconsideration of judgment filed by Connie Rhodes re 13 Order on Motion for TRO, Order on Motion to Dismiss, 14 Judgment (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 09/17/2009)
"Plaintiff was entitled to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss not sooner than Thursday, October 1, 2009, without penalty or prejudice, absent a specific warning from the Court of intention to vary from the local rules. Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11 th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President is not even nominally the Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary. "
"Judge Clay D Land ruling, Judicial misconduct, Captain Connie Rhodes motion, September 16, 2009, Orly Taitz, Rules for judicial conduct, 28 U.S.C., Judge Land guilty of judicial misconductDespite the lack of respect for the US Constitution, the rule of law, concerned American citizens and not obeying their oaths of office by judges and state election officials over the past year, I, Citizen Wells, respect the office of the judiciary and do not take lightly charging a judge with judicial misconduct. However
...
This is indeed a serious matter. At stake is the integrity of our judicial system, upholding the US Constitution and rule of law, insuring that we have a qualified president and supporting the military as they faithfully uphold the oath they have taken to defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.Judge Land, as a District Court Judge, is subject to the RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS.
“These Rules govern proceedings under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364 (the Act), to determine whether a covered judge has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts or is unable to discharge the duties of office because of mental or physical disability.”
“these Rules provide mandatory and nationally uniform provisions governing the substantive and procedural aspects of misconduct and disability proceedings under the Act.”
“(h) Misconduct. Cognizable misconduct:
6 (1) is conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts. Misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
(A) using the judge’s office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives;
(B) accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office;
(C) having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case;
(D) treating litigants or attorneys in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner;
(E) engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements;
(F) soliciting funds for organizations; or
(G) violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct, such as those pertaining to restrictions on outside income and requirements for financial disclosure.”First, note, “Misconduct includes, but is not limited to”
Judge Land is obvious guilty of two of the offenses above."
Would appear so.