Skip to comments.Beck to the Future II: Three Scary ObamaCare "Czars"
Posted on 08/29/2009 1:07:25 PM PDT by wagglebee
See Part I
Beck to the Future: Glen Beck Exposes Dangerous Link Between Nazi Eugenics and ObamaCare Reform Experts
By Peter J. Smith
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 27, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Germany's experience with National Socialism is one of the darker moments of human history. FOX News host Glenn Beck has taken on the challenge of applying the lessons of Nazi Germany (government-controlled health care, combined with the principle of valuing human beings based on "quality of life" and a severe economic crisis) to "question with boldness" the direction American health-care is heading under President Barack Obama and his policy advisors.
Beck hosts a radio program and a 5 P.M. television program on the FOX News Channel five days a week. But the anchorman's passion is for taking an honest and fearless look at Obama's advisors who have taken positions so radical out in the open that exposing them seems like melodramatic fiction.
In his health-care reform special, Beck looks at three critical advisors or "Czars" in President Obama's Administration. These policy advisors manage new offices and exercise power within the Executive Branch, but are unaccountable to Congress in the way that cabinet appointees confirmed by the full Senate are.
In the first part Beck focused on Nazi Germany, because a system that valued the worth of human beings based on "quality of life" led inevitably to Hitler's "final solution." However it began when Germans became used to the idea that human life ultimately had a value related to qualities valued by the state as a collective whole. That thinking led to the acceptance of "Lebensunwertes Leben" or "life unworthy of life," and crimes against humanity most Germans, other than the National Socialist elite, did not foresee as a consequence.
"Well-intentioned people can produce systems that raise serious questions," admonished Beck, asking his viewers to take a hard look at several advisors in Obama's inner-circle whose intentions are undermined by very serious flaws when it comes to judging which human lives have dignity - or even qualify for life at all. These advisors or "czars" are designing America's new government-controlled health-care system. Beck names them as Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, Health Reform Policy Advisor, John Holdren, Science Czar, and Cass Sunstein, the Regulatory Czar, and reminds his audience to take up President Obama's advice: to know his policies and who influences his thinking, look at his advisors.
Dr. "Zeke" Emmanuel and the Complete Lives System
Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel works in the White House Office of Management and Budget as a health-policy advisor and he is a member of the Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research. Dr. Emmanuel is one of the pillars of Obama's reform. However Dr. Emmanuel has stated repeatedly in public forums such as the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) that doctors were driving up health-care costs because they value the Hippocratic Oath as "an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of cost or effect on others."
Instead, Dr. Emmanuel raises the possibility of a new ethical system, the "Complete Lives System" that would ration care away from the elderly, away from infants, and away from human beings judged unable to rationally participate in society (such as those with dementia), in favor of those aged 15-44, who have the best chance "to live a complete life."
Dr. Emmanuel's theory of rationing, however, could end up being applied in a severe national economic crisis, far worse than the current recession, and not unlike the Great Depression that crippled Germany. Germany had made the mistake of trying to dig itself out of its staggering national debt by heavily inflating the money supply in order to save its economy. Beck makes the point that this is not too dissimilar to the United States' attempt to stimulate its economy, which unable to borrow more money from creditor-nations like China, has instead borrowed cash from the printing presses of the Federal Reserve.
Such a system could be implemented and recommended to the government insurance programs or private companies participating in the Health Insurance Exchange by means of a Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research and its advisory panels as proposed in HR 3200 "America's Affordable Health Choices Act," which soon enough may be named for the departed Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.). Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin brought attention to this fact in a Facebook statement that charged Obama and Dr. Emmanuel would turn the health-care system into a "death panel." (see coverage here and here)
But as Beck points out, Dr. Emmanuel may not believe that people who can't become developed citizens are not "basic" and "should not be guaranteed," but he is not alone in his thinking. Obama's "Science Czar" John Holdren does him one better: some people are not yet human.
John Holdren: Not Even Born Babies are Human Yet
John Holdren is President Obama's Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and Beck says he is another key player in Obama's health-care reform. But Holdren has a life-long obsession with population control and has written two books outlining a host of options to deal with what he sees as a global crisis of "human overpopulation."
Beck points out that Holdren has this to say about who is human and who is not, and babies do not qualify as human beings: "The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experience and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being."
Holdren co-authored a college textbook called "Ecoscience" in which he advanced the idea that forced abortion and sterilization of women is justifiable under the US Constitution, and that sterilizing agents could be added to the drinking water in order to curb the growth of human populations.
That background does not sick well with Americans trying to judge for themselves whether to trust the safety and effects of the hastily approved H1N1 "swine flu" vaccine. Holdren has urged Americans to take the vaccine warning that up to 90,000 Americans could die from the virus this season - although to date less only 500 Americans have died of the virus. Many are wary of taking the fast-tracked vaccine citing the 1976 swine flu scare in which the vaccine killed more people than the disease and left many more with a nerve disease called Guillian Barre syndrome.
Cass Sunstein and Rationing by QALY
Cass Sunstein, Obama's appointed advisor to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, shares opinions in common with Dr. Emmanuel and John Holdren when it comes to health-care rationing and the dignity of the human person. If Sunstein's appointment is not rejected by the Senate, then Sunstein will oversee the OIRA, which creates government regulations for federal laws.
Sunstein advocates rationing based on "quality-adjusted life years" (QALY), meaning that the government would evaluate statistically whether a person's life is worth the cost of living.
Sunstein is a radical animal rights thinker, who believes that animals such as dolphins and whales should have legal representation. Sunstein counts Princeton philosopher Peter Singer among his closest friends. Singer believes that children under the age of seven do not have sufficient rationality to count as human beings, and for that reason parents could commit infanticide.
Sunstein has also stated a desire to regulate the internet in order to fight what he calls a "system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government."
And what makes this all the more evil is that Americans DO see the consequences and Zero still wants to impose it on us.
Van Jones, EPA Brown and the FCC dude aren’t walks in the park either.
Can you believe these people are making decisions that will impact our future generations? This is scary stuff.
Here are links to the entire week of Glenn’s special on America’s future. I stayed up until 2 pm EST several nights in order to not to miss a single one.
I’m not that up on czars, will someone please explain to me what powers they have and where that power comes from? Constitutionally, I don’t see it but maybe I’m just naive.
The thought comes to mind that if these “people” are successful—WHAT FUTURE GENERATION?!
The mere fact that a "Department of Bioethics" exists at a government institution - and apparently did so even before Obama - is a big (but silent) scandal in and of itself. "Bioethics" is a term coined within the last several decades by leftist command and control health care freaks seeking to legitimatize their perverse notions within academia. That the American taxpayer actually supports masters of this macabre "science" like Emanuel is a step short of the Nazi government supporting Dr. Mengele's "research."
Bioethicists demean the value of human life by envisioning a government run system of health care where they can perpetuate "scarcity" of health care resources to achieve bureaucratic control over life and death. Their motto, as Emanuel et al say in the very first sentence of their article, is "scarcity is the mother of allocation." While the general population is made miserable by scarcity, these monsters sadistically wish to create shortages in life sustaining resources to give themselves the most powerful roles in their new perverse "paradise."
They are also increasing at an breathtaking rate--a czar for everything.
When I say this to conservatives, I invariably get the answer that there is no population problem. And I know the standard answer about poverty and starvation being due to the poor distribution of resources and I don't buy it.
I am a staunch pro-lifer. I think we just have to stress that unethical solutions will harm us and we have to find ethical ways to stop the rising tide.
This entire administration needs to go! If this House & Senate won’t begin impeachment proceedings, then we need to get butts in those seats that will.
Someone let me know when we are exiting the twilight zone...
“Mr. Mengele” is a more accurate description of this Satan follower, IMO. What an American disgrace reminiscent of 1940’s Germany. Physicians calling in to talk shows concur that he’s sick and evil.
That is just not true. There is more empty space on this planet than there is inhabited space. There are more than enough resources to feed, house, heat, cool, and clothe a much larger population. The greed of dictators and the global elite that control populations is the problem. Man’s inhumanity to man is the problem.
Every new life is a hope for the future. The way populations are being controlled is evil. There are nature’s own barriers to overpopulation should it ever occur. This world has never reached that point despite what stupid men say.
We have had nature's own barriers for quite a while now: war, starvation, rampant greed, plagues that have wiped out millions, a lowering of inhibitions against unethical termination of human life . . . I've had about enough of all of them.
I'm curious to know what kind of nature's barriers you are thinking of.
THey will advance just as far as we let them,sometimes we can stop them but not all the time.
Thanks for the reply, but I still don’t understand what they can do. Can they affect taxes? I thought that was just Congress. Can they make laws? I don’t see how?
I just don’t understand what the American people would be bound by that would originate with these czars.
“...war, starvation, rampant greed,...”
None of these things are nature’s barriers. Perhaps disease is, but here is a point to ponder. No matter how many people, earth seems to make room for more. It is a naturally occurring process, as is weather. Oceans narrow and deepen leaving more land on the surface. Hawaii is land creation in progress. It isn’t the only place. Undersea volcanoes create new land masses continously.
Resources, including oil replenish themselves. The control exercised over these resources is strictly man’s doing, not nature’s.
Forests are thriving, but we are told they are not. Forests and any other kind of vegetation will grow and grow and regrow. If you don’t tend to an asphalt highway, grass will grow on the highway or a cement sidewalk through the tiniest crack even if you can’t see it before the blades of grass poke through.
Nature provides and those in control manipulate it to their own benefit.
The problem might be that this Congress will do anything Zero wants, and the bills may be crafted with maximum leeway.
Man is part of nature.
I can believe that and most of Obama voters probably didn’t bargain for this kind of administration.
Obama is headed for that trashheap pile of really bad Presidents.
History repeats itself. Instead of Mengele, Goebbels an Himmler we have Emanuel, Holdren and Sunstein. Very scary.
Thanks for the ping!
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
"It is the duty of every patriot to protect his country from its government" - Thomas Paine
It won't do to plead 'I didn't know' when you are no longer one of 300,000,000 sovereigns but rather a tax serf living under obama's and the democrap party's federal oligarchy. If you fial to exercise your responsibility as a member of the sovereign 'We The People' you become part of the problem, like an obstacle in the way of cleaning the federal gutter.
Oh! And just to give you an example of how much a ‘lowly little car czar’ can impact your nation, think of Brian Deese, [previously an employee of John Podesta who runs the Soros org ‘Center For American Progress’, and Brian’s little cash for clunkers debacle, and the taking over of two of the major auto companies in America.
I captured this table out of the document on Scribd (linked in the article). It turns current medical practice on its head by putting concern for the system's "scarce" resources before the good of the patient.
Thanks for the ping CP.
Mark Lloyd was the other guy at the FCC.
The burden of proof of the problems of overpopulation is on you. We don’t have to prove that there is a “right” population for the earth. You do. And I don’t think you can. Malthus was proven wrong many, many times.
I don’t know what the right population is, if there is one. I just know that where we are headed is not right, and nothing constructive will be done to stop it because so many people won’t admit there is a problem or can’t see it.
Your “ignorance” link didn’t work.
I just checked it, it works. Do you know how to drag and paste? ...
....in Australia alone!
And we'd still have the rest of the planet for agriculture and vacation getaways.
Your information is errant.
This does not even factor in the available data that clearly shows populations of most nations are already in decline and below replacement rates.
The problem with people groups suffering can be directly linked to the tyrants who rule over them, not the number of "uselss eaters" against whom, as you cryptically post "...we have to find ethical ways to stop the rising tide."
Not very subtle by you.
And certainly not very humanitarian.
...oh and yes...certainly not very "polupar" of a notion either.
I tried it again and it still didn’t work. I don’t think it makes any difference, I think I missed my window for “enlightenment”.
Hey, thanks anyway!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.