Posted on 08/31/2009 2:22:41 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
Massachusetts has a legislature?
The next thing you’ll be telling me is they actually elect their senators.
And the Democrats break their own laws again. :(
I guess some animals really are more equal than others.
Kennedy could have resigned months ago...and they would have representation.
What about the Will of the People? Guess not...
Met with dismissive snickers by the Sunday Rountable programs.
Repeal the 17th Amendment. Let the Legislatures of the various States elect the federal senator. The way the Constitution was designed to work.
If we must play politics, play it at the local and apparently more accountable level.
I noticed that too, especially on "This Week" with Snufagufalus. Gwen Ifill is especially irritating when it comes to all things Kennedy.
Is Roland Burris available?
Some Democrats are nervous that this might appear to be just political? Really? Do you think so? When they had a Republican governor they changed the law so Romney wouldn’t get to appoint a Republican Senator should Kerry win. Now that they have a Democrat governor they want to change it back? Do you think people might wonder if it’s politics? Do you think people might be that smart?
Is there anybody, anywhere who seriously thinks that the law won’t be changed to let Deval Patrick appoint a Dem?
I wonder if it’s legal to do that, though. Teddy died under the old law; wouldn’t that apply to him, no matter what they do now? We don’t have ex post facto laws here in the US, even in Massachusetts, to my knowledge.
In MA precisely 63% absolutely aren't that smart, and 37% might be, at least according to last November's election results.
They’ll appoint someone that reflects Teds standards thus I expect to see a welfare rat illegal homosexual that can’t swim who has a bunch of coat hanger scars all over their body.
The word hypocracy is defined by the demorat party. When will ignorant people finally wake up.
The flip-flopping continues, as long as it helps the Liberals mining for tax money to pay for their needy constituents.
“Is Roland Burris available?”
Seriously, this needs to be explointed. Whovever fill that seat needs to appear on billboards with Burris across the Commonwealth.
They have a show legislature, the MA Supreme Court really determines legislative policy.
roflol... hoist on their own petard.
..... I disagree. The function of the MA Supreme Court, whose members are secure in guaranteed lifetime jobs, is to implement by judicial fiat those programs that the Democrooks on Beacon Hill don’t want to go on the legislative voting records as supporting and passing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.