Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jones apologizes for statements, denies 9/11 doubts
Politico ^ | September 3, 2009 | Ben Smith

Posted on 09/04/2009 1:09:09 AM PDT by BradtotheBone

A high-profile White House official is apologizing for a series of provocative statements on race and politics, and denying he ever backed a statement suggesting President Bush was complicit in the September 11 terror attacks, which appeared above his signature.

"Green jobs" pioneer Van Jones -- who made his name fusing environmentalism with anti-poverty efforts in California -- said in a statement through the White House press office:

In recent days some in the news media have reported on past statements I made before I joined the administration – some of which were made years ago. If I have offended anyone with statements I made in the past, I apologize. As for the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever.

My work at the Council on Environmental Quality is entirely focused on one goal: building clean energy incentives which create 21st century jobs that improve energy efficiency and use renewable resources.

The statement suggests that the White House will stand by Jones, who has become a top target of Fox News's Glenn Beck and other conservatives online, on talk radio and on cable news, which focused on his rhetorical attacks on "U.S. imperialism," among other targets and the allegation in some quarters that he is -- literally -- a "communist." The silence as Labor Day weekend approached had suggested that the ground was being laid for a quiet departure.

Jones apologized earlier for a profane reference to Republicans.

UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; bhoczars; communists; denial; glennbeck; greenjobs; vanjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2009 1:09:09 AM PDT by BradtotheBone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Imagine that--turn the light on and the cockroach runs for cover.
2 posted on 09/04/2009 1:11:41 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Nothing to see here, it was said YEARS ago


3 posted on 09/04/2009 1:11:58 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

of course the White House will defend him, they agree with him. It says more about Obama and what he believes


4 posted on 09/04/2009 1:12:49 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
"didn't carefully review" the document before signing it."

LOL!

He must've joined the Communist Party using the same excuse!
5 posted on 09/04/2009 1:16:09 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
ahh,gee,,ok ,if he apologizes,I mean,we got to let him take on a position were he can influence and control American lives and he was there but didn’t realize he was signing what he signed,geeeshh! how many times we heard that from these creeps???they live their lives hating America,but they didn’t realize what they were doing -after lord obama gives them power. We are all counting on 2010 to get our country back,,,you think these clowns aren’t planning for the same senario?
6 posted on 09/04/2009 1:18:20 AM PDT by coalman (type to slow to be relevant,but I try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Does this green-colla thug have a first name or is Van Jones his full name? Sounds like a last name.


7 posted on 09/04/2009 1:18:37 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

> A White House official, seeking to explain Jones’s
> signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones “didn’t
> carefully review” the document before signing it.

What business retains a high-profile employee who doesn’t carefully review a document before SIGNING it?

This guy should be fired for that alone.


8 posted on 09/04/2009 1:22:02 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

He is a down right pinko liar!!!!


9 posted on 09/04/2009 1:23:34 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

“UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones’s signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones “didn’t carefully review” the document before signing it.”

if BULLSH*T was snow, we’d be in for a blizzard


10 posted on 09/04/2009 1:33:31 AM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Get the **** out of my government, you stinking, lying, communist bastard.


11 posted on 09/04/2009 1:37:37 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07
if BULLSH*T was snow, we’d be in for a blizzard

It must have been over a thousand pages, would take two days to read and two lawyers to explain.

12 posted on 09/04/2009 1:48:07 AM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

(If I have offended anyone with statements I made in the past, I apologize.)

Yet another non-apology “apology”. Notice that he didn’t apologize for making the statement, only for having offended people! LOL! I am more offended by the slimy “apology” than by the statements! It just shows that he hasn’t stopped trying to insult people’s intelligence.


13 posted on 09/04/2009 1:49:03 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone; All
Just ran across this- take it FWIW:

Van Jones, with all his race-baiting 'get whitey' BS, is a fraud

 

With my family: my wife Jana and sons Mattai and Cabral.

14 posted on 09/04/2009 1:49:59 AM PDT by backhoe (All across America, the Lights are going out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

bump


15 posted on 09/04/2009 1:52:18 AM PDT by borntobeagle (Insurrection, anyone??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Get the **** out of my government, you stinking, lying, communist bastard.

Needs to be said again...

16 posted on 09/04/2009 1:52:47 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

How much Carbon was produced having those kids?


17 posted on 09/04/2009 1:56:17 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

18 posted on 09/04/2009 1:59:16 AM PDT by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . . . . KILLAGRAM@WHITEHOUSE.GOV . . . . . . . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry

LOL! It’s getting old all the lying about things they’ve done, real old. They aren’t fooling anyone.

Keep digging morons.


19 posted on 09/04/2009 2:01:12 AM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tina07
LOL! It’s getting old all the lying about things they’ve done, real old. They aren’t fooling anyone.

Only themselves. They've lied for so long they wouldn't know the truth if it hit them between the eyes. Lucky for us Al Gore invented the Internet so we can keep track of their lies for them.

20 posted on 09/04/2009 2:10:55 AM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Why is everyone pussy footing around the bare bold face facts that this administration is full of Communists and Communist sympathizers including Mr. O. Whatever happened to integrity instead of this sneaking around, pussy, girly moves, not letting anybody know you are a Communist.

If I were one I would be proud of it. Afterall it would be my belief system and I would be open about the Communist ideology if I had any balls. These guys must not have any and that’s why there acting like a bunch of scared women.


21 posted on 09/04/2009 2:22:37 AM PDT by ladyL (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Each day it seems:

The Sun rises

Ben Smith makes yet another excuse for Obozo


22 posted on 09/04/2009 2:30:28 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

OMG. Now Van Jones is a blatant liar.


23 posted on 09/04/2009 2:39:35 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

didn’t this Yale educated lawyer whom I am sure read any document makes some anti-american statements on 9-12-2001


24 posted on 09/04/2009 2:44:57 AM PDT by scooby321 (and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Let us look at both sides of the story.

Either he is telling the truth or he's lying in his statement today, right?

If he is lying today (i.e., he knew what he was signing when he signed it), then, first, he is a 911 wacko and, second, he has lied to the white House...meaning he has no judgment and is not trustworthy.

If he is telling the truth today (i.e., he didn't know what he was signing when he signed it), then he's a fool for signing something he didn't read and he lied to the 911 truth organization...meaning he has no judgment and is not trustworthy.

Either way, he has no judgment and is not trustworthy. Meaning he is a PERFECT FIT for the Obama Administration.

25 posted on 09/04/2009 2:49:55 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.

Sorry, not buying it. Ever see that program on TV, Lie to Me? C'mon get up in front of We the People and make your statement, get out from under the White House skirts of protection. Dare ya'. Double dog dare ya'. Stand up and answer for your treasonous statements.

This whole 0bama administration is a misquote, misread, failed to review, misunderstood BS of a lying ....ok...I'll get myself banned if I keep rolling ....

The one thing these folks didn't count on was a knowledgeable base of Americans old enough to know the difference between what they are trying to 'sell' us and a snake oil salesman.

Van Jones isn't who I want to hear from either. 0bama needs to answer for his appointment as adviser to the President.

26 posted on 09/04/2009 2:54:26 AM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Van obviously has psychological issues. No doubt about that after all his rants. LOL! The guy is psycho plain and simple.


27 posted on 09/04/2009 2:56:45 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
A couple of things stand out here.

First, fellow travelers with Jones must be really impressed with him now. He very quickly repudiated that he ever thought the Government was involved with 9/11 and the administration has to cover for him for being a self proclaimed communist. Hey guys, I was just funnin' ya, just stringin' ya along. No hard feelings, ok?

Second, advertisers who pulled their sponsorships from Glenn Beck must be kicking themselves because they came down on the side of a nut who accused the Government of being involved with 9/11 and who is a self proclaimed communist. Oh how much better it would have been and how much better they would have looked if they had stuck to their principles. Instead, the Jones hit the fan and they got splattered big time.

28 posted on 09/04/2009 3:08:21 AM PDT by Enterprise (When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Decades ago, the Commies asked me to sign a petition without mentioning what it was about. It was about nominating Gus Hall for President and Angela Davis as Vice President.

After determining the paper's contents I refused. I don't buy van Jones's story.

29 posted on 09/04/2009 3:08:24 AM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
The document didn't even need "careful reviewing." It's a short, straightforward piece whose purpose and intent. They used bullet points, for crying out loud, on the front page.

It's important to note that it wasn't initially a petition, as we normally think of it. It was a statement. Here's the language the truthers use on their own site about it: "In connection with this news, we have assembled 100 notable Americans and 40 family members of those who died to sign this 9/11 Statement

The petition eventually got hundreds of thousands of signatories. However, Jones was #46--among the initial assembled group. This was no oversight or carelessness in 'reviewing" a document. He was in on it from the start, as one of the instigators and organizers.

30 posted on 09/04/2009 3:12:27 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EBH; PhilDragoo
"0bama needs to answer for his appointment as adviser to the President."

This was a totally reckless and inexcusable appointment. All the Republicans in the Senate and the House should have a joint press conference to express their dismay that a man who has such radical views should be appointed to any position in the United States government. I think September 8th would be a good day for such a conference.

31 posted on 09/04/2009 3:16:03 AM PDT by Enterprise (When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Jones is simply a carbon copy of our Marxist magic negro.
Keel Haul the lot of these turds.


32 posted on 09/04/2009 3:23:36 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (google; operation garden spot and REX84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

And he never said he was a commie I bet, too. And he isn’t black and he doesn’t wear expensive suits and he doesn’t wear glasses and he doesn’t really know Emperor obie. He’s just some guy who lived in the neighborhood.

When in trouble, lie. The MSM will say, “Oh, OK!”


33 posted on 09/04/2009 3:25:50 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

There are a number of “reckless” appointments. Van Jones was just the easy target. He had enough “tape” out there in his own words to be called to account.

You can bet they are scrubbing things clean as we speak on all the other little czars.

Glenn begged his watchdogs to find it, download it, and save it.


34 posted on 09/04/2009 3:30:50 AM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EBH

That is a very profound observation my friend. Now maybe the other czars are going to get a well deserved microscopic examination by conservatives. Van Jones, et al, started it, by grabbing a tiger by the tail.


35 posted on 09/04/2009 3:36:28 AM PDT by Enterprise (When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Your apologizing for something you really, deep down believe, Van Jones? lulz.

Your either trying to protect your 6-digit job or simply a liar, you tell us, kkthx.


36 posted on 09/04/2009 3:45:02 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.

That's a joke, right? Especially coming after the long list of other disassociations from past words and actions?

37 posted on 09/04/2009 3:54:33 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.

Then the *sshole is incompetent to be working in the White House. And when is someone in the legislative branch going to take a stand against the shadow government of the czars that Obama has appointed?

38 posted on 09/04/2009 3:54:57 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Countdown to Van Jones going under the bus...3,2,


39 posted on 09/04/2009 3:55:47 AM PDT by y6162 (uish..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.

If he is willing to sign a treasonus document without reading it, why should he have a top post in the government?

Can anyone in this administration give a cogent answer to this?
40 posted on 09/04/2009 3:58:28 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321; All
didn’t this affirmative action Yale educated lawyer whom I am sure read any document makes some anti-american statements on 9-12-2001.

Fixed it.
41 posted on 09/04/2009 3:59:56 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Those kids are using up alot of the earths resources.


42 posted on 09/04/2009 4:00:58 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

He will say any thing to make this go away. There are many Obama bodies under the bus.


43 posted on 09/04/2009 4:01:28 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Liberals feed on dead Senators and babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

He better hope his wife is not one of those “white poisoners.”


44 posted on 09/04/2009 4:03:30 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

The wonderful thing about being a liberal is that you can reinvent yourself every morning when you wake up simply by issuing an apology and pointing out that whatever it was you did that was offensive occurred in the distant past (more than a week).


45 posted on 09/04/2009 4:22:29 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
If I have offended anyone with statements I made in the past, I apologize.

In other words: "I said what I meant, and I'm sorry if you didn't like it."

46 posted on 09/04/2009 4:35:10 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
UPDATE: A White House official, seeking to explain Jones's signature on the 9/11 statement, says Jones "didn't carefully review" the document before signing it.

But according to this White House administration, voting for and signing a 1,000+ page piece of legislation without reading it and carefully reviewing it is OK hunky dory.

Idiots.

47 posted on 09/04/2009 4:55:02 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
The statement suggests that the White House will stand by Jones

Glenn Beck and others need to keep up the pressure. If we can get to the point of the "White House Apology of the Day", then these folks will be way down on the list of public support.

48 posted on 09/04/2009 5:06:15 AM PDT by Dustoff45 (A non-posting Freeper makes no spelling errors (Have a Misspell on me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: library user
Does this green-colla thug have a first name

I think Van is short for Ivan
49 posted on 09/04/2009 5:11:29 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Well, why not? Congressmen don’t read bills before voting for them. Obama doesn’t read them before signing them into law. Responsibility and accountability are soooo last century.


50 posted on 09/04/2009 5:29:39 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson