O.o

Ok, this is interesting.... I can't post the link to Taitz's site, it has been blocked by FR for Malware. My computer is not detecting any.

FReepers up. Is it real, or is it memorex?

Title edited to fit.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

Yes I downloaded the images to a secure source before posting the article, so I have them as they are as of right now.

Here we go again....

The footprint looks black, is that any help?

Not exactly breaking news...

But carry on.

I’m not expecting much out of this Smith guy. His history isn’t encouraging.

LOL! Where is that little kid or Van Jones screaming “that’s racist!”???

That’s RACIST!!

Yeah. Looks suspicious. Barry ain’t all that black.

No idea who he is to be honest, I have let this story drop, I was really bored so I looked at Taitz’s site. And well, yea, interesting.

Ping

It looks a lot more authentic than the obviously fraudulent document that the Obama campaign has posted on their website. I would question how this guy Lucas obtained the document.

Smart move, we have learned out lesson well. I take screen shots of everything before I mention them online. I then know what is important. It’s the ones they have scrubbed after they have been posted. Too late now, everyone saves them first. It just helps us in knowing what they deem important. Slowly but surely we are closing in on them. It’s only a matter of time. Much is known that they have no clue about. good attorneys and private investigators don’t tip their hand first and Orly isn’t the only one working on this bc case. There are others that keep their name out of the news and play their cards close to their chest, as they should.

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
"The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record.
BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.”
It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in.
In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9)
.... there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.

BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.”
The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”

BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.
(See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.)
In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” §338-41 [in 1961]).

In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.”

Fool my once, shame on you,
Fool me twice, shame on me,
Fool me thrice, and I oughta beat myself in the head with a baseball bat.

It is probably fake. Did they even have a typewriter in Kenya in 1961???

I’ve pulled them down as well to a secure source

Is this an attempt to focus the attention away from the Whitehouse Health Bill that is ever so secretly...

Oh forget it.

This administration is like going to Cirque de Solei on Jolt.