Posted on 09/06/2009 6:40:29 AM PDT by jessduntno
No more czars! No more pogroms!
Of course an ineligible POTUS that nominated these individuals makes them technically impotent to retain their positions.
Just something to remind people that Obama is, still is, and never was legally by the Constituition eligible to be POTUS.
The solution is available, it needs to be enforced.
bump
Agreed.
Except I don’t think an ‘openly gay man’ should be controversial generally, let alone as the AIDS czar. The ‘czar’ bit, I of course still take issue with.
They failed their sworn duty the day they certified the electoral college without questioning his eligibility!
The are no longer the "check and balance" but are complicit in the takeover.
bump for reference
Why can I not find this headline at your link? Can you point me in the right direction on her page?
Obama has said that the Constitution is imperfect because it only has ‘negative rights’.
And they will be ousted en masse from Congress in the next election cycle for it. The Dimocrats are going to pay a huge politcal price for this Obamanation.
My copy of the Constitution must be incomplete. I am still looking for the clause that says: “The president may, without oversight, appoint as many “czars” as he may desire, who are accountable only to him, and whose duties, salary, etc. need not be made public.”
Thank you!
Now that's an oxymoron for you.
ping for later
Very good post. Maybe the clause is in fine print somewhere, perhaps the same place that allows the government to issue much currency as it desires by an agency whose books need not be made public.
And the salary per Czar is?
And the total payroll we taxpayers are footing for the Czars is?
And the average number of staff per Czar is?
And the total payroll we taxpayers are footing for their staff is?
And the travel, meal and entertainment and office allotment cost is how much for us taxpayers?
Bookmarked for later research.
Or his clan. Isn’t this how African countries operate? First we have half his family and cronies living in the WH or traveling with him for vacations at taxpayers’ expense, and then there are the buddies and hangers-on who are given lucrative positions in the administration. Instead of czars, you could call them his posse or retinue. Obama is either a chief or a king.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.