Skip to comments.CNN's Brazile Defends Jones: 'Let Me Just Say to Conservatives There's Nothing Wrong with Liberals'
Posted on 09/07/2009 3:58:12 PM PDT by Rufus2007
The evidence is in on Van Jones. He's and admitted communist, signed a petition supporting 9/11 conspiracy theories and has called Republicans a series of vulgar names, and according to Democratic strategist Donna Brazile - there's nothing wrong with that.
Brazile, a CNN regular, appeared on CNN's Sept. 7 "The Situation Room," and reacted to Jones' Sept. 5 late-night resignation.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Take-away - there's nothing wrong with 9/11 trutherism????
Nope, nothing wrong at all with liberals....who self-proclaim to be radicals, communists, racists, etc....nope, nothing wrong here at all, Brazile. =.=
Jones is not a liberal. Not is a radical anti-American nutjob communist
I was drafted and told to go out and kill commies.
Seems to me we've still got work to do.
The liberals, about 20% of the population, thinks everybody loves radicals and commies.
This surprise anyone? Anyone at all?
Look Brazil. We didn’t drag Jones out of the White House bunker. HE RESIGNED YOU IDIOT! It’s not OUR fault he couldn’t take the heat!
Maybe someone should look into Brazile’s affiliates...
Maybe not, but marxists, socialists and communists are evil.
"Liberal" is a relative term.
Stupid is as stupid says.
Welcome Home, and Thank You for your Service to Our Country.
Are Koko B Ware and Donna Brazile the same person?
Brazile is an assho*e. Darn. There goes my chance for a Tsar job.
1. Donna Brazile was a superdelegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
2. Mouthpiece of MSM
3. NPR (or as they call it Public Radio International)
“Brazile is a weekly contributor and political commentator on CNN’s The Situation Room and American Morning and in CNN’s Election Coverage. In addition, she is a contributing writer for Ms. Magazine and was a former columnist for Roll Call. Brazile is also founder and managing director of Brazile and Associates and a contributor to NPR’s Political Corner and ABC News. In 2004, Simon and Schuster published Cooking With Grease, Brazile’s memoir of her life and work in politics.”
Let them keep yapping.
Lets get a raise of hands from each and everyone of them.
Let America know who they all are.
“a controversial statement”....Donna, Donna, Donna.
Jones has a whole videologue of statements that let us see into his heart and mind - that he is not just a liberal...he is a self-avowed communist.
And unlike you and Obama, many in America still loathe communists in our government. Add to that his wacko 911 truther beliefs, and you have to know he is not qualified to hold any kind of government position in this country.
Stop defending the commie, Donna or more Americans will come to believe Obama himself embraces that murderous ideology.....oh.
Actually, Brazile flogs the race incessently.
She called Bush a racist post-Katrina.
She said that “we can’t let the white men win.”
She’s a progressive and progressivism is collectivism is a mental problem.
A Liberal is a Closet Communist, A Socialist is coming out of the Closet, and a Communist is already out of the Closet and trying to push you into the Closet.
She is a Communist.
I would say that a series of statements might connote a specific philosophy. In Van Jones' case, a communist one. I believe the label is appropriate.
Yes, she is.
The press did everything they could to cover for Jones too - but they can't keep the lid on all the stories now that we have FOX news and the internet and radio. Too bad Brazil - the truth got out and he QUIT.
Yep, that’s right. I don’t have a thing against liberals, despite their ignorance and intolerance. What I don’t like are the communists and progressive socialists that are becoming so prevalent with this pretender in office.
It’s time to take back the country.
"Let me just say that Van Jones was a very, very intelligent man," Brazile said. "A Yale graduate, someone who came up from the public schools of Jackson, Tenn. to make something of himself. People have a deep and abiding respect for his expertise for on the environment."
Except for the fact that he can't describe a 'green job' or name one!
It's no surprise that one of the biggest supporters of the Apollo Alliance is the United Steelworkers Alliance labor leaders see green jobs as a way to fight outsourcing and keep manufacturing alive in America. And there is a strong political component to green-collar jobs, which is why presidential candidates love talking about them so much.
Touting green-collar jobs can convince skeptical, blue-collar Americans that they have an economic stake in curbing climate change.
a green-collar job can be anything that helps put America on the path to a cleaner, more energy efficient future. That means jobs in the public transit sector, jobs in green building, jobs in energy efficiency even traditional, blue-collar manufacturing jobs, provided what you're making is more or less green.
So, over and over again, we have these people endorsing the radical Van Jones. Perhaps there is little practical difference between “liberal” and “communist” - at least in the Democrats’ minds.
So, the nation is headed for a round of socialism - or Marxism, as the case may be. And these people don’t care at all.
I wouldn’t characterize the people running the Democratic Party today as “liberals”, anyway. There’s nothing liberal about them.
Brazile is simply pleading ignorance. The man said he was a Commie, and that’s that. BTW, Brazile wouldn’t really need to plead ignorance ~ she’s just plain ignorant ~ almost all the time. It’s a wonder she can sit down and whiz.
You gotta be Obama-ing me.
Right...because we all know intelligent people sign documents they haven't read. At least that's what this doufus wants us to believe.
Yup, a real MENSA candidate you have there, Donna....
..this is probably where Van and I agree...I have called Republicans the same name that he did....heh heh....sometimes worse....
...having said that, I will still be in R camp next election cycle..
....if there has not formed a credible Conservative party before then...
Donna Brazile, huh, seems to me she was the adviser on the failed Gore campaign that said on a live mic, “We’re not gonna let the white boys win” or “Don’t let the white boys win.”
Anyone else recall this? Just another racist democrat.
I disagree. Let's not theraputize what really is evil. Plain, naked, smirking evil. You can't 'cure' collectivism any more than you can 'negotiate' with cancer.
That’s funny. Brazille vouching for Van Jones?
“And let me just say something about the so-called czars,” Brazile added. “I don’t know if it’s 15 or 30. I don’t care if it’s five. President Obama is assembling the best and brightest to help transform our economy to ensure that we can adapt to the new conditions that face us each and every day. These are people with special expertise.”
Translation:We are circumventing the constitution to transform this Republic into a fascist state.”
Lot's of smart people lie like a dog.
” Too bad Brazil - the truth got out and he QUIT “
That’s right. And she knows it.
And there’s a lot more truth lined up behind that.
She’s just running cover for all the other radicals in Obama’s administration. If people can be inured to Van Jones’ radicalism (being brain-washed into believing that this is just “liberalism” in a liberal administration), then it will be easier to get them to look the other way when more facts come out about other administration personnel (”ho hum, he’s not a Communist, just a good liberal”).
Well, of course, Ms. Brazile. That is because "Stage One Reasoning" (as Thomas Sowell puts it) is a genetic requirement for Liberalism.
She can see it is a controversial statement.
She can see him as a liberal.
But when she hears Van Jones characterized as a "Radical" she has no frame of reference outside her of her own frame that she can view it in.
And because she is a liberal where engaging in groupthink is part of the air that you breathe, and that is all she knows. As a liberal, she does not view Van Jones as an "individual" (and certainly not an individual as Adam Smith or F.A. Hayek would define an "individual")
She sees him as a part of a group or groups, and her only interest in him is how his groups intersect and interact.
She sees a group of people defined to her as liberals. She sees another group called radicals. She doesn't see Van Jones as an individual who has been shaped to a large degree by the environment around him, and she DEFINITELY doesn't see Van Jones as being bound by or responsible for the words that come out of his mouth. She is, after all, a Kool-Aid drinking liberal who said when running Al Gore's campaign: "...She will not let the "white boys" win. And that's not a description of "gender or race, it's an attitude. A white-boy attitude is 'I must exclude, denigrate and leave behind..."
As Ann Coulter sarcastically (appropriately so) pointed out, her BOSS was one of those "white boys"...
I have long maintained, most liberals are incapable of appreciating irony. To appreciate irony, to be able to step back and look at yourself is a critical tool, and most dyed-in-the-wool liberals don't have it, in my opinion.
In this case, Donna Brazile, whose entire scope of ideological existence is primarily based on lumping people together in groups to be pandered to, she is so shallow that she misses the cause and effect of this situation and engages in that which she criticizes.
If nothing else, she does have a knack for generating irony.
Show us his college transcripts from Yale, Donna. In his own words he was there as a radical not a student.
If thats true, then let Obama stand by him.
We didn't fire the guy.
Let Obama defend him.
Would that Jones were a mere liberal...
So, there was nothing wrong with “macaca?”
Oh, wait, a ‘Pubbie said that. Different standards apply.
Put this leftist in the soon to be punished catalog. There is a lot wrong with your type Donna. I simply cannot wait until the eggs and rotten tomatoes start flying.
But Ms. Brazille, if a liberal is a communist- what then?
I guess she didn’t read Savage’s book.
I'm glad to hear no 'enlightened' liberal has ever called a controversial conservative a Nazi, then. < /sarc>
Doesn’t irony also require a fundamental identifying of what is true? Democrats and especially liberals have no clue what is true and behave accordingly, lying as easily as breathing because they give themselves the right to lie in order to win. Such a state of dishonesty cannot fathom irony, no fraem of truth reference.
Huh. That hadn't even occurred to me. But now that you mention it, yeah. That has to be true.
Oddly enough, that is one of my usual complaints about satire (which I see as related to irony) is that if it is too close to the truth, it loses its effectiveness. My feeling is that if you can't differentiate satire from reality, then it cannot be satire. But it is that element of determining the truth in something.
I think you are correct. You have to be able to see reality/truth.