Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
WND ^ | 9/8/09 | staff

Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 851-871 next last
To: john mirse
When judge Carter was appointed a judge, did he have to provide his marine records, his long form birth certificate, and his college records before he was officially appointed to be a judge?

Being a natural born citizen is not a requirement to be a federal judge.

Did you know that there is no requirement to be a lawyer to become a federal judge in a federal court at any level, including the U.S. Supreme Court?

In fact there is only one position mentioned in the constitution that requires a legal question, and even that requirement is vague. Can you name that position?

151 posted on 09/08/2009 4:02:47 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

i used to know Mark Penn. THick-headed, but don’t like marxists.


152 posted on 09/08/2009 4:03:02 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: FARS

BUMP


153 posted on 09/08/2009 4:04:28 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

If my theory is right...it is going to be shut down on matters of National Security.

Btw, anyone figure out how a man with a 19 year old FBI investigation with 600 pages ends up having a son that worked in the Defense Intelligence Agency??? the FBI investigation ended the year kennedy was killed.


154 posted on 09/08/2009 4:04:32 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Carter has had the opportunity to toss it twice now, and hasn’t.

One opportunity, back in July. And as he pointed out in court if he dismissed on a technicality then Taitz could refile the next day. It was a better use of the court's time to take her by the hand and show her what she should have done in the first place.

There hasn't been another hearing until today so when was the second opportunity to toss it? Unless you count every time Taitz appears in court a chance to throw her case out?

155 posted on 09/08/2009 4:04:46 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

By all means, keep that sunny, optimistic disposition. Many decades of life have made me somewhat darker in outlook, but I wouldn’t wish my personality on a dog.


156 posted on 09/08/2009 4:04:54 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

You’re welcome.


157 posted on 09/08/2009 4:05:02 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Today was opportunity #2


158 posted on 09/08/2009 4:05:29 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues

http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=3255

(very long but lots of good info)


159 posted on 09/08/2009 4:06:06 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ComeOnNow

You just signed up today to make your observation? How interesting!


160 posted on 09/08/2009 4:06:21 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

You’re welcome.


161 posted on 09/08/2009 4:06:38 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

Thank you for your clarification.


162 posted on 09/08/2009 4:06:46 PM PDT by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew
How does one tentatively schedule a trial?

Happens all the time. The dates are not carved in stone. Cases can settle before the trial date. Cases can be dismissed before the trial date. Trial dates can be pushed back or postponed indefinitely. It just gets it on the calendar and sets a date to shoot for.

163 posted on 09/08/2009 4:07:03 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Why not just wait till he is out of office?

Would you prefer 2012 or 2016?

164 posted on 09/08/2009 4:07:54 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet

You’re welcome. Thanks for your “spanking.” LOL


165 posted on 09/08/2009 4:08:52 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Sarah Palin can see the left's heads explode from her house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Everyone relax. January 26, 2010 still leaves plenty of time for payoffs and intimidation of Judge Carter.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

166 posted on 09/08/2009 4:09:44 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If this case somehow makes it into the national news, more people might start asking why it is so important for Obama to keep all of his records hidden. It might also have been a tactical to use taxpayer dollars to keep Obama’s records hidde. This raises further questions.


167 posted on 09/08/2009 4:10:20 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
And in a simple but pointed parallel, that's exactly what all this is about. God bless and keep America!


168 posted on 09/08/2009 4:10:28 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Most legal pros are kneepadding for the boy marxist.

Eventually, so will Judge Carter. He's a Clinton appointee from RI. He's ruled in favor of Gay-Straight Alliance clubs to be allowed on California public school campuses. 0bama's minions will get to him somehow.

169 posted on 09/08/2009 4:10:42 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

“Why not just wait till he is out of office?”

Are you kidding?


170 posted on 09/08/2009 4:11:00 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

We KNOW why. He’s dirty!


171 posted on 09/08/2009 4:11:54 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jacquej; pissant

Wonder if it’s this ComeOnNow?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/comeonnow

there was another one with a similar name yesterday that was trying to defend Obama, too.

On topic, I hope Judge Carter holds fast.


172 posted on 09/08/2009 4:12:43 PM PDT by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

Thank you!


173 posted on 09/08/2009 4:15:15 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Why not just wait till he is out of office? Like, when we're even MORE screwed than we are NOW?
174 posted on 09/08/2009 4:16:26 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Sarah Palin can see the left's heads explode from her house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ComeOnNow
Welcome to FR

09/08/2009

175 posted on 09/08/2009 4:16:39 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Intelligent Design is to evolution what the Swift Boat Vets were to the Kerry campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #176 Removed by Moderator

To: All

I guess a lot will depend on how big the turnout will be at the 9/12 March.


177 posted on 09/08/2009 4:20:23 PM PDT by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

I don’t get it. Why do you say that “Carter hasn’t tossed this case yet because Zero’s motion to dismiss has not been fully submitted to the Court for consideration”? I thought it was. What was incomplete?


178 posted on 09/08/2009 4:20:28 PM PDT by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

: )


179 posted on 09/08/2009 4:20:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

LOL...my cats love ‘computer time’ too! They love some of the YouTube stuff of birds and squirrels, etc.


180 posted on 09/08/2009 4:23:33 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Amen!!


181 posted on 09/08/2009 4:23:50 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Welcome to FR. Another day, another troll.

Hey, he/she/it just wanted to join up and "help" FReepers "understand" and help them "not get too excited".

Notice the absolute coincidence in choosing a name that sounds very similar to FReeper "holdonnow"?

182 posted on 09/08/2009 4:26:11 PM PDT by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I remembered the picture of the judge that you posted.. I thought it would be good to post in on this thread too.


Robert O’Brien, Afghan Attorney General Abdul Jabar Sabit, and Judge David Carter at the Attorney General?s Office in Kabul.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2333868/posts?page=223#223


183 posted on 09/08/2009 4:26:30 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady
Perhaps that's why when reading from the teleprompter, Obama said in the speech to schoolkids today: My mother couldn't afford to send me to the school where all the AMERICAN kids went.

An interesting choice of words.

Notice that he didn't say: "... the school where all the OTHER American kids went." He didn't consider himself one of them.

A slip of his slippery tongue.

184 posted on 09/08/2009 4:26:45 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Every time I see that phrase it reminds me of how they changed it in the Hollyweird film to “Truth, Justice and all that other stuff”....bastards.


185 posted on 09/08/2009 4:27:58 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in it." - Ted Kennedy (D-HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper
Hey, he/she/it just wanted to join up and "help" FReepers "understand" and help them "not get too excited".

Or, as some of us say, "wee-weed up."

186 posted on 09/08/2009 4:29:17 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Sarah Palin can see the left's heads explode from her house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Favorite Bloggers (1)
Rachel Maddow

Sounds right...Madcow is a hoot...like watching a demented cartoon character...


187 posted on 09/08/2009 4:29:50 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in it." - Ted Kennedy (D-HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: bray

I personally believe the Tea Party express is at risk.

I don’t know what kind or how serious. Feels more serious than slightly. Feels moderatly to seriously.

I’ve voiced it to at least one person . . . we are praying.


188 posted on 09/08/2009 4:30:01 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: ComeOnNow

http://www.vikingkittens.com/


189 posted on 09/08/2009 4:37:53 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: pissant

In 2020, the courts will decide!


190 posted on 09/08/2009 4:39:03 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I hope this moves forward. All that is needed is a court order requesting the release of the long form birth certificate, all amendments and corresponding hospital record.


191 posted on 09/08/2009 4:41:41 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Licensed-To-Carry
Licensed-To-Carry ~ I predict Judge Carter will wake up with a bloody horses head in his bed, in just about 7 days.

pissant ~ But he’s a Marine. Might not work on him.

Dunno, my dad's a WWII Korea Vietnam vet Marine.

His only comment when walking out of the theater?

He felt sorry for the horse.

(He said those people deserved each other, but the horse?)...

192 posted on 09/08/2009 4:42:54 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 230 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ComeOnNow

Welcome to FR!


193 posted on 09/08/2009 4:44:24 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 230 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It will be interesting to see if this case opens the floodgates for other lawsuits.


194 posted on 09/08/2009 4:44:36 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

“Assuming obama tries to block discovery”

He’s already spent close to a million trying to prevent this info from getting out. I’m guessing we are now using MY money to prevent it from getting out. Quite frankly, I feel that I am also a party who is being harmed by more theft from the Greatest Thief.


195 posted on 09/08/2009 4:47:21 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Thanks for posting.


196 posted on 09/08/2009 4:49:55 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant; blue-duncan; 1000 silverlings; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Forest Keeper; wmfights; HarleyD; ..
Waddayathink?

And here's a handy link re: the Law of Nations and “natural-born” citizenship...

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html

Also it was brought to my attention today that the “natural-born citizen” clause (meaning TWO parents need to be U.S. citizens) was inserted in the Constitution in order to prevent Alexander Hamilton from becoming President (because of his questionable parentage.)

197 posted on 09/08/2009 4:50:29 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Have I missed something? I have always understood the multiple ways BHO might not be a citizen. What I never see is a discussion about his name.

IF... his name was legally changed to Barry Soertoro, he may no longer be Barack Obama. The papers where he applied to law licenses, Illinois State Senate, US Senate, etc. may not even be valid.

Comments?


198 posted on 09/08/2009 4:51:06 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

I was just wondering if hisspending our tax dollars on this issue may not be a blessing in disguise. Why is the politico now following this case? Is it because Obama has now involved the DOJ?

Besides many Obama supporters deny that he is even fighting this case at all. Now the politico reporting of him using the DOJ to claim that no American citizens have standing and that no Court has jurisdiction is proof positive that Obama is fighting this case and that his position is that no American ciizen or Court has the right to challenge him.


199 posted on 09/08/2009 4:51:41 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I LIKE - I LIKE!


200 posted on 09/08/2009 4:53:35 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 851-871 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson