Skip to comments.Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Some expanded info on Expedited Discovery...
Thanks for posting the good news.
Nothing on Orly’s blog about this so I am going to be cautious.
All judges want matters expedited. Whether that means that he wants to see a trial on the merits - whatever they are is one thing.
Or it could mean that he doesn’t want to spend the next year reading badly-written motions and wants to get to dismissal as quickly as possible.
Judges say a lot of things - and most of them are to encourage settlement.
Case in point: back in my days as a law clerk, I was assisting on a property line dispute and the judge said in open court “Settle this before someone gets really hurt.”
Thanks for the ping!
The thing is, it doesn’t matter to us either way. If it is proven that Barry O. is a fraud and we already know he is the star of his own sitcom, he will be removed. Period.
There will be no support for him to continue using Air Force One. All and I mean All of his support mechanisms in the Senate and Congress will immediately throw him under the bus.
They and the Judiciary have any number of ways to make life harsh for this caricature. Heck, what if the Congress suddenly stopped sending bills for him to sign, waiting for his replacement?
That would be a huge slap in the face of anyone who is pretending to be something he is not and I guarantee you he will leave, in a D.C. taxi.
Has anyone confirmed this with the parties or with Carter’s office?
I can’t get excited until I see verified proof.
here is the order in question
OK, any lawyers that can explain this?
Ah! Wondered why the repetitive robot hadn’t shown up. Thanks for the update.
Thank you for all the pings, Fars.
Some good Sunday reading from http://AntiMullah.com
Be happy, be well
Thanks for the ping!
It's Judge Carter's order setting October 5th for the hearing on the defense's motion to dismiss. Taitz and Kreep have until September 21 to reply to the motion in writing giving their reasons why the judge should not grant it. Then the defense has until September 28th to reply in writing to the plaintiff's reply. Then the judge will hold the hearing on October 5th and will issue his ruling then or shortly thereafter. This is what they are discussing:
It's in. Link
And yes, I read it.
Official transcript from last Tuesday. Link
Oops, my bad. It’s the transcript from July and not Tuesday. Never mind. I’ll keep looking.
Still. Pretty interesting. Thanks for posting.
Now we have the transcript from last Tuesday. Link
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.