Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Biblical Affirmation of Homosexuality (barf alert)
http://www.afterellen.com/node/58561 ^ | September 9, 2009

Posted on 09/09/2009 7:42:32 AM PDT by Morgana

I found this while stumbling. Forgive me if it is a repost. The link below is a letter written from a Christian minister named Bruce Lowe. He graduated from the University of Arkadelphia, Arkansas in 1936. He is now a staunch defender of LGBT rights and has delineated a biblical justification for homosexual acceptance. He encourages equality before the law as well as equality within the church.

Here is the introduction to his letter. Every LGBTQQ Christian should take the time to read his words. I think it will make a lot of you feel a little bit better. (The specific biblical argument can be found in Appendix B of the letter)

http://www.godmademegay.com/Letter.htm

"I have been asked if Louise is real. Yes, and this was a real letter to her. Shortly after I had gone to my first pastorate out of the seminary, Louise invited my wife, Anna Marie, and me to have Sunday dinner with her family. That was over 50 years ago, and she has been one of our dearest friends ever since.

The last time we visited her she told me what I have related in the first sentence of this Letter. At that time I really knew nothing about homosexuality. I did have some suppositions-- quite negative--and had never thought I needed to study it. But her words made me want to know as much as I could learn about it.

When I began reading I soon realized things about myself I now deplore: I was ignorant of the many facts about homosexuality and what the Bible says about it. Without facts I had pre-judged it; I was prejudiced. With little thought I had read into the Bible what I presumed it ought to say instead of reading out of it what it does say.

(Excerpt) Read more at afterellen.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bible; homosexualagenda; lgbt; pervert; pervertpower; religiousleft; sin; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last
You have to be kidding me!!!!! This is sick!
1 posted on 09/09/2009 7:42:33 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Fa**ot? That’s really christan of you


2 posted on 09/09/2009 7:46:26 AM PDT by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

No honest reading of the Bible can arrive at such a conclusion. Only Satan could do so, and that is exactly what is happening.


3 posted on 09/09/2009 7:46:33 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

And yet Ian McKellan continues to feel the need to rip pages that specifically condemn homosexuality out of any Bible he comes across.


4 posted on 09/09/2009 7:47:23 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy; Chode

Faggot? I meant “filthy disease ridden queer presumably”


5 posted on 09/09/2009 7:48:28 AM PDT by Morgana (No one has ever had an idea in a dress suit. - Sir Frederick G. Banting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
He encourages equality before the law as well as equality within the church. Christ accepted that everyone but God was equally a sinner, and told them that those who belived in Him were forgiven...and to knock it off. End of story, turn the page. You can't out-think, re-think, massage, or nit-pick His word. Well, not and still be forgiven, anyway.
6 posted on 09/09/2009 7:48:39 AM PDT by 50sDad (The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
One of his justifications for God supporting homosexuality, Luke 19:13, which reads:

So he called ten of his servants and gave them ten minas.'Put this money to work,' he said, 'until I come back.'

Uh, I don't see it.

7 posted on 09/09/2009 7:49:06 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If you go to Appendix B of the letter itself, you’ll see a lot of parsing and spinning of Biblical passages. Satan has proven his ability to use God’s Word to turn people to him. This is just another instance.

Sick? Yes. New? Nope. Ultimately devastating to them? You bet!


8 posted on 09/09/2009 7:50:13 AM PDT by bcsco (Hopey changey down the drainey...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Bruce Lowe is a graduate of Ouachita Baptist University in Arkadelphia, Arkansas (1936) and of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas (1946). He married Anna Marie in 1944; they have two sons and two grandsons. His ministry included the chaplaincy during World War II, pastorates in Louisiana, and teaching Bible at Louisiana College, Pineville.****** He left the ministry in 1966 and worked until retirement in the Office for****** Civil Rights of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.


9 posted on 09/09/2009 7:50:16 AM PDT by redstateconfidential ("They augur misgovernment at a distance; and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I don’t see it either.........maybe it is just us? Or maybe their filthy diseases have made them “see things”????


10 posted on 09/09/2009 7:50:21 AM PDT by Morgana (No one has ever had an idea in a dress suit. - Sir Frederick G. Banting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I read the letter. He is so full of it.


11 posted on 09/09/2009 7:52:46 AM PDT by imskylark (To educate a person in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. -Teddy Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This so-called pastor is a doofus. All of his “arguments” have been refuted many times. He is one of those who will say he did things “in Christ’s name” and will be told by Christ “I never knew you”. Sad, really.


12 posted on 09/09/2009 7:53:06 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Faggot? I meant “filthy disease ridden queer presumably”

Seriously, we don't have to be mean. We're all sinners in one way or another, and if we want to be judged as we are to judge, it is best to be firm...but kind.

To this end, I refer to it as Same Sex Affection Disorder (or being SSAD.)

13 posted on 09/09/2009 7:53:35 AM PDT by 50sDad (The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Well you know the times we live in ... .

2 Timothy 4:3

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;

Many poohoo the Bible too that don't even go along with homosexuality.

2Tim.3:16

[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

They selectively prefer the word of man over the Word of God.

There is a consequence to this:

Prov.15:10

[10] Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.

Still, as I mentioned, those that reject homosexuality continue this verse. They prefer what fallible philosophers have to say not the Prophets and Apostles had to say - all under the inspiration of God. They ignore this too: Col.2:8 [8] Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

14 posted on 09/09/2009 7:53:38 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Another justification for God supporting true homosexuals:

Several passages in the Bible speak of same-gender sex. In every instance, the Bible is talking about heterosexuals who, filled with lust, have become sex perverts. The Bible says nothing about innate homosexuality as we know it today or about people who are homosexuals.

Uh, again, I don't get it. The author believes that the people who practiced gay sex in the Bible were really heterosexuals who aren't being what they were supposed to be, while it is supposed to be silently assumed to be okay to be gay as long as you started gay. Right.

Then I say God supports random murder, with the same reasoning. That is, as long as you started with such inclinations. However, if you were a peace-loving person, you are sinning if you commit random murders.

15 posted on 09/09/2009 7:54:01 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Assuming that every thing he says is so, so what? Let the homosexuals go to their own “accepting” churches. I don’t demand that the Catholics or Presbyterians or whatever preach my beliefs, nor do I permit them to demand that I agree with them.

True tolerance is not demanding that everyone agree with you, or with some position, but is allowing everyone to go to Hell in their own way, so long as they do not harm others physically, or through fraud. If they get their feelings hurt, that’s their lookout.


16 posted on 09/09/2009 7:54:21 AM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Unfortunately, it depends what version of the Bible we’re talking about. That’s one reason why the KJV had to be “revised” in the 1800’s.


17 posted on 09/09/2009 7:55:58 AM PDT by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
From the "theologians" words:

"Some commentators suggest that I Tim. 4:1-4, in speaking of marriage being good and not to be denied because "everything created by God is good," would include homosexual marriage because God created homosexuality."

18 posted on 09/09/2009 7:57:22 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingpins10

Oh? No version I’ve ever used has condoned homosexuality.


19 posted on 09/09/2009 7:57:44 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kingpins10

Total nonsense. All versions of the Bible which are accurately translated basically say the same thing.

The only ones which don’t are those which purposely change the meaning.


20 posted on 09/09/2009 7:58:00 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Or engaging in sex with animals or children.

Surely God made those who have such urges. So their giving in to their urges must by definition be God’s will.

This article is actually a tour de force. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen such a collection of logical fallacies in one document.

If I had the time I’d go through and point out each one. But I have neither the time nor the patience for such nonsense.


21 posted on 09/09/2009 8:00:15 AM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Without reading the rest of this vomit, I know they are full of it. There is no Biblical “affirmation” of homosexuality, only in their dreams. There isn’t a single passage of Scripture that condones two men or two women “joining” in the same manner as a man and a woman in matrimony. In fact, when one does come across a passage describing same-gender “sexual relations”, you always find negative descriptors ( “abomination”, “vile”, “against nature”, “unseemly”, “given over to a reprobate {rejected} mind”, homosexuality is linked with sins of those who will NOT inherit the Kingdom of God, etc.).

When you take what the Bible says about sex outside of marriage (hetero or perverted) then couple that with how it blesses sexual relations within the a man/woman marriage covenant, there is no way anyone reading the Bible would walk away believing that it condones homosexuality, in any form! The only way one would even make such a claim with a straight face is like this person who already has their mind made up and will twist Scripture like a pretzel, in the name of “compassion” or to condone what they are already doing.


22 posted on 09/09/2009 8:00:56 AM PDT by Sister_T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If “God Made me Gay” didn’t “God made me a Murderer” also? The moral relativism and reductio ad nauseum can get a little silly.


23 posted on 09/09/2009 8:01:19 AM PDT by BertWheeler (Dance and the world dances with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
Yea and the same FDRQ’s ganged up on an elderly woman and took the cross she was carrying and stomped on it. Oh yea...that was sooooo big of them! To pick on an old lady, and attack our religion. Now they do this? Try to bend the Bible to their perverted sex? They destroy everything they touch. They are lepers in society and need to be treated as such.
24 posted on 09/09/2009 8:01:21 AM PDT by Morgana (No one has ever had an idea in a dress suit. - Sir Frederick G. Banting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Agreed.

If Nature’s God intended to endorse same sex relationships, He wouldn’t have made humans as male and female.

Its a no-brainer even without scripture.


25 posted on 09/09/2009 8:03:09 AM PDT by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sister_T

They would not try this crap with Islam...


26 posted on 09/09/2009 8:03:25 AM PDT by Morgana (No one has ever had an idea in a dress suit. - Sir Frederick G. Banting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chesley

If people preach falsehood in the name of Christianity, the true church should publicly condemn it, not tolerate it. This doesn’t mean we need to silence them, but we need to make it clear this isn’t just a minor doctrinal difference without another legitimate denomination.


27 posted on 09/09/2009 8:03:42 AM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

There are only two options set down from when the worlds were formed. The one is chastity and the other heterosexuality. If one is Christian, Muslim, or Jewish there are no other valid options. You either devote your life to God or you devote your life to your opposite sex spouse. There is no ambiguity in the matter. References to eunuchs are never in relationship to homosexuality though many have distorted such things for political gain.

As for a secular perspective it should be just as clear. Homosexuality and all forms of extra-sexual behavior is an aberration and detrimental to the life of an organism and its ability to reproduce. I know there has been a misguided effort to cater to homosexuality and other forms of deviance but the basic fact that it is first and foremost unhealthy should be an indicator that something is wrong on a very basic level. Also it is well know that those who stray from heterosexuality and monogamy in a radical fashion tend to have a history of being sexually abused and or go on to abuse others.

There is no good reason to promote or teach fairy tales where these destructive unhealthy behaviors are concerned. They cost society far more than obesity and smoking when you track the cost of sexual permissiveness to its end. The effects on children are particularly devastating. Any Christian who believes that sexual deviance should be celebrated should be excommunicated and shunned. It is a destructive hateful lie they are promoting but the beast is a liar and he has set up his castle along the Potomac.

http://www.americansfortruth.com


28 posted on 09/09/2009 8:08:45 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Party like it's 1776!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It is also an insane rationalization and extreme distortion of the reason for the Biblical admonition against homosexuality.

HE says:
“Down through history same-gender sex was universally considered to be acts by (heterosexual) people who had chosen to engage in perverted sex.”

And that is what he bases his whole explanation for acceptance on. That wan’t the reasoning in the Bible so his long winded excuse for why WE didn’t/don’t understand that GOD made a mistake is just ridiculous.


29 posted on 09/09/2009 8:09:52 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I went to the website - it’s clearly a gay activist place with virtually no focus on Christianity except trying to trick regular Christians into thinking Homosexuality should be seen as something healthy and loving. It’s not. It’s lust based and “sexual organ” centric - to put it bluntly.

Gays, as people, can be pretty nice and I’ve known many but the act of homosexuality isn’t celebratory.


30 posted on 09/09/2009 8:24:38 AM PDT by BertWheeler (Dance and the world dances with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstateconfidential

“Reverend” Lowe graduated from the same seminary as 2 other so-called reverends named Rick Warren and Mike Huckabee. Huckabee also went to Ouachita Baptist University. What is in the water at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary?


31 posted on 09/09/2009 8:25:34 AM PDT by DFG (1 useless man is called a disgrace, 2 are called a law firm, 3 or more are called Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DFG

If it’s anything like most seminaries, there are tons of classes on psychology. Brainwashing. Seen it.
You can rationalize anything. That doesn’t make it right.


32 posted on 09/09/2009 8:34:20 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

From my skewed interpretation of this “scholarly” analysis of homoerotic relations, it would seem to me that Pastor Bruce has accepted fully the “science” of homoerotic determinism synthesized over the last 100 years as fact then manipulates the Word of God to so that He agrees with the “science”. This seems backwards to me, but then I am just a fearful clinger.

This kind of reasoning is what puts the sophistry in sophistication. Seems fairly prideful to so confidently commit these comments to the record.

The NappyOne


33 posted on 09/09/2009 8:37:37 AM PDT by NappyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

As a document, the letter and its appendices rely on sophistry to make a wrong thing “right”. As appealing as the idea may be for some folks, the Holy Bible does not support or condone homosexual sex acts. Indeed, these are specifically condemned.

That said, I don’t think it is possible to ascertain whether people are born homosexualists or whether homosexuality is a disorder that can be treated. My own personal view is that homosexualists are probably born that way.

I am of the view that Christians are always on safer grounds when we spend less time fussing over the sins of others and focus instead on working out our own salvation with fear and trembling, as we are told to do.

This does not absolve us from identifying wrongdoing or eschewing Evil, but it does provide a perfectly good opportunity to apply Christ’s instruction to “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.”

Applying Christ’s instructions is what Christians are supposed to do. Anything outside of that is extraneous and fraught with peril.


34 posted on 09/09/2009 8:37:37 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Of course not! Within Christianity, there are enough “tares”, if you will, who are guided, not by “every word that precedes out of the mouth of God”, but by the misguided notion of “love”, “compassion” and “tolerance”. These tares aren’t concerned about the wheat rising up to physically slay them because even they know that would be against the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Within Islam, the more rabid element threaten death to those who just “insult Islam”! Imagine what they would do to someone who would dare suggest that Allah didn’t have a problem with homosexuality! *shudders*


35 posted on 09/09/2009 8:39:48 AM PDT by Sister_T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Oh brother, what a weak argument.


36 posted on 09/09/2009 8:41:01 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

>>No honest reading of the Bible can arrive at such a conclusion. Only Satan could do so, and that is exactly what is happening.<<

Although I agree with your first sentence, I disagree with the use of the word “only” in the second. Man can do it as well.

I saw a gay preacher make these same arguments back in the late 1990’s. It is clearly a logical leap to interpret scripture the way he, and this article, do. It just goes to show that people (all of us) really want to find justification for the things we do - especially the things we feel strongly compelled to do. And sex is a biggie. I don’t condemn homosexuals any more than I condemn heterosexuals that shack up or sleep around. However, I most definitely see the activity itself as a sin. And when heterosexuals start wearing “adulterist (or fornicators) pride” parades, I’ll be just as against it.

Some issues can be reasonably argued by discussing scriptural supports - an example would be the HELL: Eternal Torment or Complete Annihilation? debate held right here on FR - but this one is not intellectually honest.


37 posted on 09/09/2009 8:44:33 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingpins10

Say what?

Here is the KJV translation of Leviticus 20:13

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.


38 posted on 09/09/2009 8:45:00 AM PDT by allmendream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

This is an assertion on his part unsupported by historical documentation.

The ancient Greeks tolerated erotic pederasty as a means of social stability and cohesion of the military class (Reference: Xenophon’s Persian Expedition), but it was certainly not without controversy nor universal acceptance. That young men were expected to become husbands and fathers later in life, and in turn, to become the older member of a pederast pairing, erotic or plutonic, argues just the opposite of Pastor Bruce’s assertion that, “Down through history same-gender sex was universally considered to be acts by (heterosexual) people who had chosen to engage in perverted sex.” In fact, it blows it out of the water.

The NappyOne


39 posted on 09/09/2009 8:48:37 AM PDT by NappyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is not a Biblical affirmation but rather a man’s justification for what is clearly stated as an abomination in the Bible.


40 posted on 09/09/2009 8:51:47 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Hey............How's that Hope and Change Thingy workin' for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s amazing what qualifies as a ‘Christian Minister’ these days, eh?


41 posted on 09/09/2009 8:52:12 AM PDT by Freddd (Government run health care=paying more and being denied what we already have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
Well, of course it should be condemned by the true Church. Verbally, by preaching, etc.

But. Tolerance requires that we not force them in any way. Offend them. That's OK.

And they are likewise allowed to offend us. But not shut us up by various “hate-speech” or “hate-crime” statutes. That's what I'm saying.

42 posted on 09/09/2009 8:54:36 AM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Bruce


43 posted on 09/09/2009 8:54:58 AM PDT by T Minus Four (I'm all wee-weed up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NappyOne

Exactly true. But the Greeks were way too concerned with all things sexual. They became decadent, and in turn, their decadence destroyed them.
It was like an addiction, and, as with all addictions, the “kick” had to be greater and greater to achieve the same effect.
The so-called “gay community” is ample proof of that. The more perversion, the better. The more antisocial, antireligious, antihuman, the better.
The advent of modern psychiatry as a religion has fed this monster and now its appetite cannot be satisfied.


44 posted on 09/09/2009 9:03:23 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
Seriously, we don't have to be mean. We're all sinners in one way or another, and if we want to be judged as we are to judge, it is best to be firm...but kind.

True; God loves the sinner but hates the sin. We don't have to approve of it, but better to let them know that we pray for them as we quietly chastize them.

45 posted on 09/09/2009 9:08:09 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

The New American Bible: Leviticus 20:13
“If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.”
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/leviticus/leviticus20.htm

Douay-Rheims Bible: Leviticus 20:13
“If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination, let them be put to death: their blood be upon them.”

http://www.drbo.org/chapter/03020.htm


46 posted on 09/09/2009 9:09:51 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: trisham

But what of the claim that the KJV translation was changed?

Seems pretty consistent with every other translation, including the literal translation.

Homosexuality is specifically condemned in the Bible and in language that it is rather difficult to ignore.

The King James translation is accurate in this and most other verses.


47 posted on 09/09/2009 9:13:51 AM PDT by allmendream
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

“Applying Christ’s instructions is what Christians are supposed to do. Anything outside of that is extraneous and fraught with peril.”

Perfectly fine on an individual basis, but judgement also requires us to protect our children and our values. When they force themselves on my children in the public schools, in government regulations, inject themselves into MY life without being invited, try to force ME to accept the unacceptable, fighting that every step of the way is a DUTY.
I have had friends who were homosexual. All I ever asked of them was NOT to flaunt it in my face. When it happened, in spite of my request, they proved themselves no longer worthy of my friendship. Friendship is a two way street. I respected their privacy. They did NOT respect me. End of story.


48 posted on 09/09/2009 9:15:08 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

“But what of the claim that the KJV translation was changed?”

“Seems pretty consistent with every other translation, including the literal translation.”

Hebrew Scriptures makes the exact same statement. There is no way it could be mistranslated in any way.


49 posted on 09/09/2009 9:18:46 AM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

They’re very similar here, I agree.


50 posted on 09/09/2009 9:19:15 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson