Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pittsburgh to Philly Maglev to Receive $28 million in Federal Funding
Arlen Specter's Senate Website ^ | 9/10/09

Posted on 09/11/2009 8:10:54 AM PDT by Born Conservative

U.S. Senators Arlen Specter and Bob Casey and Congressmen Bill Shuster and Mike Doyle today announced that the Pennsylvania High-Speed Maglev Project will receive $28 million in federal funding. The funding is in the form of a grant from the Federal Railroad Administration SAFETEA-LU Maglev Program.

“This $28 million award is the most significant development in the 29 years we’ve been working on Maglev,” Senator Specter said. “The vision is to have a 250 mile-an-hour train traveling from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia with intermediate stops. Such a train would be a tremendous economic boon with thousands of new jobs in the steel and construction industry and would meet our increasing demand for transportation, reduce highway congestion, improve air quality and reduce our dependence on foreign oil.”

“This long-awaited and long overdue funding will help move development of high speed maglev forward,” said Senator Casey. “This project has the chance to help establish a world-class transportation system in Pennsylvania and I am pleased that the Federal Railroad Administration has decided to award these funds to the Pennsylvania Maglev project after a competitive grant process. This initiative has the potential to spur job creation while helping to improve our environment and bolster the Commonwealth’s long-term economic competitiveness. I look forward to working with all stakeholders to build on the progress that this federal investment will help bring about.”

“I’ve been working to build a mag-lev system in Pennsylvania throughout my service in Congress,” said Congressman Mike Doyle. “I believe it could be a major new engine for job creation and economic growth in our region. It’s great to see all our hard work paying off.”

“This is a great investment in the next generation of rail that will continue Pennsylvania’s long history of innovation and advancement in rail transportation,” said Congressman Bill Shuster, Ranking Republican on the House Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials. “A true high speed rail line connecting Pittsburgh and Philadelphia will prove that rail transportation remains a premier way to travel in the 21st Century. I look forward to working with my colleagues Senators Specter and Casey as this exciting project moves forward.”

Today’s funding announcement represents the largest federal grant ever given to the project and more than doubles the $22.5 million in federal funding the project has received since Fiscal Year 1999. The grant will allow the project to complete pre-engineering, update its financial plan, conduct an independent cost-analysis, perform studies for infrastructure placement and execute a bid for a bridge over the Monongahela River.

The Pennsylvania High-Speed Maglev Project is an environmentally friendly and energy efficient transportation system that would initially cover a 54-mile long route in three sections, connecting the Pittsburgh International Airport (PIA) with downtown Pittsburgh and the eastern suburbs at the Pennsylvania Turnpike and the City of Greensburg. An estimated 14.2 million passengers are expected to utilize this segment per year. Eventually, the line would be extended to Philadelphia and include stops in Johnstown/Altoona, State College, Harrisburg, Lancaster and Philadelphia. It is situated as the hub of a future multi-state, intercity network that will reach from the major northeast cities to those in the Midwest.

Based on standard job projection formulas used in the transportation industry that include material production, the first segment will create nearly 57,000 overall jobs, including approximately 2,500 construction jobs for the first segment’s 2½ year construction period.


TOPICS: Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: billshuster; bobcasey; maglev; mikedoyle; specter; wastefulspending
Another boondoggle on the way...

(apologies for changing title; title on website won't fit)

1 posted on 09/11/2009 8:10:54 AM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

$28M? In (my home state of) Pennsylvania, that ought to be good for, maybe two miles of rail...


2 posted on 09/11/2009 8:11:58 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Yep. A big white elephant


3 posted on 09/11/2009 8:12:10 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com ............. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

My thoughts exactly. Maglev is expensive. $28 million won’t pay for tap water on a project like that, although i must say I find it exciting. Intercontinental rail could go a long way to saving energy - trucking needs to start declining.


4 posted on 09/11/2009 8:13:59 AM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

LOL You are exactly right!


5 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:41 AM PDT by A. Morgan (The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. Lawrence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
.........two miles of rail...

You wish. On a project like this, $28 Million won't cover the design phase. This is a $25BILLION project. ++

6 posted on 09/11/2009 8:14:55 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Congratulations Obama Voters! You are not prejudiced. Unpatriotic, maybe. Dumb definitely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

NO train in the US has been a “economic boom” since around 1885


7 posted on 09/11/2009 8:15:09 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

That’s OK. Fast Eddie will issue all maglev passengers hitchhiking permits (at a nominal charge), so they can complete the trip fr/the ‘Burgh to Philly w/o increasing their carbon footprint.


8 posted on 09/11/2009 8:15:18 AM PDT by SAJ (way too late to 'work within the system'. just about time for rebellion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

“This $28 million award is the most significant development in the 29 years we’ve been working on Maglev,” Senator Specter said.

29 years! And people want the gubmint in charge of healthcare.


9 posted on 09/11/2009 8:15:51 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“$28M? In (my home state of) Pennsylvania, that ought to be good for, maybe two miles of rail...”

Agreed. I grew up in Philly and still visit quite often. $28 million? $28 billion I’d believe.

Anyone think about the cost of cutting through the mountains, for example?


10 posted on 09/11/2009 8:15:51 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

The train to nowhere - both ways.


11 posted on 09/11/2009 8:17:27 AM PDT by ebshumidors
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

hahahaaha 28 Million to get to Greensburg? Please, its cost them close to $500 MILLION to add less than a Mile to the Pittsburgh Subway System. There is no way in hell they’ll get a maglev from the airport to greensburg, they won’t even get it downtown for that.

I am not inately against high speed trains, but the idea that 28 Million in this state would do anything other than MAYBE pay for another study is comical.

You can’t put up a stop sign in this state without spending $10,000 on a traffic study first.


12 posted on 09/11/2009 8:18:01 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Is there even any market for this route? (not that it matters to the politicians)


13 posted on 09/11/2009 8:18:11 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“$28M? In (my home state of) Pennsylvania, that ought to be good for, maybe two miles of rail...”

You’re correct. They’re building an extension of the subway in Pittsburgh underneath the Allegheny river that is less than 1 mile in length, and the cost is at least $1/2 Billion.


14 posted on 09/11/2009 8:18:31 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

that’ll pay for a mile or two, then what?


15 posted on 09/11/2009 8:18:53 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

gee, you mean I would be able to find myself in West Philadelphia in less than an hour? Are they building this to move ACORN thugs around more efficiently?


16 posted on 09/11/2009 8:19:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

$28 million will be just enough to get the union bosses together to talk about the project. In Las Vegas.


17 posted on 09/11/2009 8:20:37 AM PDT by airborne (Don't let history record that, when faced with evil, you did nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

“Is there even any market for this route? (not that it matters to the politicians)”

I doubt it. Is the Pitt/Philly business traffic that much? They’d have to charge a fortune to maintain it. Flying will once again be the cheaper alternative.


18 posted on 09/11/2009 8:20:38 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Ping


19 posted on 09/11/2009 8:21:15 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Ping?


20 posted on 09/11/2009 8:26:51 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Maybe they should build an airport like Murthas

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7415354


21 posted on 09/11/2009 8:28:30 AM PDT by pickyourpoison (" Laus Deo ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
U.S. Senators Arlen Specter and Bob Casey and Congressmen Bill Shuster and Mike Doyle today announced that the Pennsylvania High-Speed Maglev Project will receive $28 million in federal funding.

Where in the hell is my cut?

22 posted on 09/11/2009 8:29:35 AM PDT by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

this is America, we fly.

or we load the family into the family truckster and road-trip.

rail is so Euro-thirdworld.

(ps I love all things mechanial, especial locomotives)

it’s a 6 hour drive Philly to P-burgh


23 posted on 09/11/2009 8:30:51 AM PDT by lack-of-trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I love trains, but why do we need this again? Southwest flys from Philly to Pittsburgh several times a day. Takes an hour.

And if they think they’re building a 250 MPH high speed line which is 54 miles long..... for $29 million they’re either lying or crazy. It’ll take 10 times that much.

Tax, spend. Tax, spend. That’s all these @#@#!??@ know how to do.


24 posted on 09/11/2009 8:32:11 AM PDT by Big E
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny
that’ll pay for a mile or two, then what?

Then the payoffs have been passed around, the nephews and cousins hired, the pockets lined...and now we just HAVE to finish it with State money. In for a penny, and all.

25 posted on 09/11/2009 8:39:52 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Big E

doesnt southwest charge $29 one way from phila to pittsburgh? i know its fairly cheap to fly there. whos gonna pay more to take the train? you know theyll charge at least $100 a ticket one way. this is just plain stupidity... what a waste of money, just to please some environmental nutcases who want to turn the usa into europe.


26 posted on 09/11/2009 8:41:39 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Pittsburgh to Philly? Why? What’s the point? Philly’s our stale, foul, crumbling, shriveling chocolate city, and all the steel mills in Pittsburgh are cold. Last time I was out there, I noted that an alien visitor, just learning the language, might end up believing that “Space Available” and “Building to Let” were the two biggest companies in Pitts. And Pennsylvania’s the nation’s second-eldest state, to boot. None but Florida have more old people, or a higher percentage of old people. But we’ve got $28 million for magnetic levitation train work? With government(s), unions, and consultants involved? It’ll buy ‘em little more than lunch, drinks and supper at some grand fact-finding conclave.


27 posted on 09/11/2009 8:41:49 AM PDT by flowerplough ( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Eventually, the line would be extended to Philadelphia and include stops in Johnstown/Altoona, State College, Harrisburg, Lancaster and Philadelphia.


Johnstown/Altoona? A gazillion-gazillion dollar super-duper bullet train of the "future is now" stopping at Johnstown and Altoona? Really, though, there won't be a return on their money until there's a stop at Nanty-Glo. (I don't know why they write "Johnstown/Altoona." They aren't connected.)
28 posted on 09/11/2009 8:50:02 AM PDT by Since 2009-07-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Do you mean you haven’t seen those jam-packed trains from Philly to Atlantic City these days? And how much did that boondoggle cost?

$28 million isn’t even enough to pay off the bribes.


29 posted on 09/11/2009 8:54:00 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick (We Snowflakes will always remember our beloved Snowman with the incandescent smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack; domenad
$28 million is to piss away in another useless study. They've been talking about a Maglev from Greensburg to the airport for years where there is actually a highly congested traffic corridor which might allow them to recoup 50% of the cost eventually and it has gone nowhere.

On the other hand, they could build an above ground light rail for a fraction of the cost of the Maglev or add more than one train per day in each direction on the Pennsylvanian Amtrak which runs daily between New York and Pittsburgh via Philadelphia and actually is one of Amtrak's few profitable routes because people actually can afford to ride it, but that wouldn't be sexy or piss away the study dollars either.

30 posted on 09/11/2009 8:54:26 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

The cheap Southwest fares are highly restricted with long advance puchase requirements and the like. However, you can get a fairly reasonable walk-up fare of around $70 each way as long as you are willing to avoid the peak travel times. Amtrak will also give you a walk-up fare for around $50, leaving Pittsburgh at about 7 a.m. and arriving in Philly by 2 p.m., continuing on to New York.


31 posted on 09/11/2009 9:02:26 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

[i]”$28M? In (my home state of) Pennsylvania, that ought to be good for, maybe two miles of rail...”[/i]

Not one dime of this money goes to construction costs. This is all for feasibility studies, and other soft costs. In other words, its political pay-off money. Pissing away our tax dollars and lining the pockets of their cronies.


32 posted on 09/11/2009 9:16:06 AM PDT by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

To be fair, they won’t be building the entire thing under a river.

I’d take a maglev from Greensburg to the airport if it was conveniently timed and cheaper than long-term parking.


33 posted on 09/11/2009 10:15:50 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Since 2009-07-21

Maybe it will stop in Tyrone.


34 posted on 09/11/2009 10:16:26 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

To be fair, they NEVER SHOULD HAVE BUILT THIS THING UNDER THE RIVER!!! over 1/2 a BILLION dollars for a few hundred feet! People should literally be drawn and quartered for this nonsense.


35 posted on 09/11/2009 11:48:43 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The problem with the Pitt to NYC via Amtrak, is that insane Layover in Philly. I believe last I looked its a 4 or 6 hour wait time from the time you get to the Philly and the time the next train leaves for DC on a typical day.

I believe total Amtrak time Pitt to NYC is something like 12 hours or more.


36 posted on 09/11/2009 11:51:30 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
The layover in Philly is now only 30-35 minutes. My daughter just took the train last month to visit my other daughter in NJ and it has a 96% on-time record.

Click on this link and scroll to the bottom. The timetable is for the "Pennsylvanian". Not many years ago, it had horrible service and horrible ridership. It was upgraded under the Bush administration and is now quite popular.

Amtrak Timetables.

37 posted on 09/11/2009 1:26:10 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
Not one dime of this money goes to construction costs. This is all for feasibility studies, and other soft costs. In other words, its political pay-off money. Pissing away our tax dollars and lining the pockets of their cronies.

I don't see how you make a logical leap from "feasibility studies" to "political pay-off".
Surely you don't expect them to jump right into construction without conducting the detailed planning required by the feasibility studies.

38 posted on 09/14/2009 11:16:36 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
Ping?

Thanks for the ping.... I suppose....
It is mildly disturbing to see so many 'tards whining about $28 million not being enough to cover the construction costs,
Heck, it says right in the article that "The grant will allow the project to complete pre-engineering, update its financial plan, conduct an independent cost-analysis, perform studies for infrastructure placement and execute a bid for a bridge over the Monongahela River."

But that sentence is obviously way beyond the reading comprehension level of many on this thread.

39 posted on 09/14/2009 11:38:21 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson