♀☹☠☣☢★☆☆★☢☣☠☹♂
Posted on 09/11/2009 12:31:30 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
It's a lesson he should have learned from Plaxico Burress -- but this was worse.
A 15-year-old Brooklyn boy shot himself in the penis Sunday after fumbling with a gun that had slid from his waistband, authorities said yesterday.
Khamir Grant was then arrested for reckless endangerment and criminal possession of a weapon -- the same charges levied against Burress, who shot himself at a Manhattan nightclub in 2008, law-enforcement sources said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
1) Not have already reproduced
AND
2) Render him (her) self unable to reproduce, by committing some act of stupidity.
Death is convenient, but not necessary.
If he had, for example, blown his bollocks off (both of them) he would have satisfied the requirements,
Will the young gangsta wannabe be changing his name to Karen?
... screaming "If I can't have you, then NO man can!" ;)
When are these morons with guns going to learn that sticking the gun in your waistband is a BAD idea?
There’s a few of these reports every year and you’d think that word would get out.
“No Wang” Vo was a well-known Toronto gangster despite having partially shot off his member back in the ‘90s.
He didn’t use up his bad luck then, though, it must be said.
He was shot and killed last winter in a presumed contract hit.
They wont....cause they’re stooooopid.
LOL!
Reminds me of the man who went to Lover’s Leap and cut off his right hand.
Ping! ;)
I was wondering about the possibility of a Double Darwin, involving his own survival AND his ability to reproduce.
LOL. Since the other one wasn't working, likely.
I hate it when it does that.
It won’t be long before the psycho wonks come up with a syndrome—The Plaxico Burris Syndrome.
Technically it is just "removed from the gene pool" which is usually by death. In this case, the punk is probably still capable of reproducing - so he is still not really a Darwin award candidate. But if he were a more effective accidental shooter, then he would be the unique legitimate SURVIVING Darwin Award candidate.
LMAO
These morons are way to stooooopid to use up valuable air.
Nope .............
Actual winners must meet the following criteria:
Reproduction - Out of the gene pool: dead or sterile.
Excellence - Astounding misapplication of judgment.
Self-Selection - Cause one’s own demise.
Maturity - Capable of sound judgment.
Veracity -The event must be true.
http://www.darwinawards.com/rules/
He could still die of gangrene of the pecker.
Why would a Glock be more unlikely than a revolver?
This sort of accident is actually a GOOD thing for the gene pool.
Because Glocks suck?
That’s for sure...
That’s just a matter of time. The ‘before reproducing’ requirement may have been satisfied.... That’s why he’s a candidate, rather than a winner at this stage.
Some guns have only a palm safety. Therefore, when the weapon slips down their pants, and their trying to feel for it (sorry), they inadvertantly pull the trigger—which probably has a light pull anyway.
I suspect the gun was small cheap automatic. Accidentally firing a single shot revolver tends to be a bit more difficult because the trigger pull must do a lot more than on an automatic. The trigger action rotates the cylinder as well as releasing the sear.
A Glock doesn’t have a decocker.
I bet the nurses had a lot of fun at this idiot’s expense—in their locker room, of course.
Grooooooaaaaannnn!!!
Glocks suck. Their supporters here are idiots who paid twice what the piece of junk is....so the do back flips trying to justify what they paid. Glocks are a piece of JUNK.
His might be the first. :)
Real men and confident women have no problem with them. Maybe it is just a bit too much of a "grown-up" gun for some people.
Worldwide sale further proves you mistaken.
Finally it appears you couldn't answer my simple question either.
LMAO!
I bet he’s all “wee wee’d” up now!
I suspect this event will be the most significant accomplishment of his life. Doesn’t sound like he’ll be around long anyway.
BS. There have been more people “accidentally” shot with glock junk ( including cops)than any other pistol in history. They just suck.
What are you six years old?
Here you are shouting like a baby at the top of your lungs without either a fact,a clue or any experience.
I bet you got your ass whipped at both chess and band camp. Probably left your virginity there too.
No Im not six years old. The guns are piece of junk. LMAO. Good luck selling yours.
Oh...you are a punk too. :)
Nursing’s a tough job. They deserve a few perks.
I’m betting our species is overall better off without Khamir swimming in the gene pool.
If it's a bad day for penises then why is THIS one smiling?
“Hey at least his girlfriend can keep him from straying, all she needs is a combination lock now...”
Damn, now that’s funny!
That is HILARIOUS!!!
If the weapon was chambered, reaching to retrieve it from inside the underwear could cause it to discharge when an ‘insensitive’ finger depressed the trigger.
I might as well ask. What pistol do you routinely carry and compete?
Even though the Glock does not have a decocker, it is pretty damned difficult to touch it off unless you have you finger fully wrapped around the trigger. Regardless, a dork like this shouldn’t be carrying anything that doesn’t have a combination lock for a safety. Ever heard of a holster? Sheesh.
close but no weiner.
Wow! Hard to argue with that.
Cocked and locked?
More of a Sig Sauer fan myself...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
