Posted on 09/17/2009 12:48:22 PM PDT by rface
VIDEO At Link HERE
.
21-year-old Mark Fuhre, an Alex Jones Show listener, decided to post the flyers even though the Infowars Obama Joker Poster Contest had ended, because he wanted to alert his neighbors to the cult of personality being manufactured around Obama and how the establishment is stifling any criticism of the President by constantly invoking racism.
Fuhre believed that he had a first amendment right to express his opinion, just as those that spray painted giant Obama “HOPE” murals in the same neighborhood had done without opposition.
They will get him on posting bills on public property.
maybe so - but it will be selective prosecution
And 0bama is a uniter my butt.
0bama is a jackass.<-—————— I could say more but the list on names we can call him is short.
BTW:I always assumed Brietbart news was liberal.Is Brietbart the one reporting on ACORN this Brietbart.
Also, break a rib; sue police department.
So where’s the big criminal drag net on all those “criminals” posting “lost dog”, “Lose 20 pounds in a week for $10” or “Free firewood” signs? So where’s the hazards in these situations? Where’s the hundreds of criminals who did this and why isn’t there a major investigation finding these people??
Oh, maybe it’s because those signs didn’t insult their Marxist Commissar.
Yeah, freedom of speech—indeed.
No doubt, as it is always what left wing thugs do.
The Won’s National Security Force in its infancy.
"Come Hear My Lame Band!"
Then they should go after the guy also that painted the hopie changie thing on his very public wall. It could cause serious damage to conservatives who have to puke every time they see it!
ROFL!
There has got to be more to this story than is being reported. If he was posting the flyers on private or public property without the consent of the owners or the city then the guy broke the law and is wrong.
Also, are the pro-Obama murals painted on private property with the consent of the owners? If so, there isn’t a legal problem with the murals. Private property owners have the right to “discriminate” and allow only certain signs/murals posted on their property.
However, if the pro-obama murals were allowed to be done on public property, but the anti-obama flyers were not, then the guy should sue.
Unfortunately, I can’t judge without knowing more of this story.
Freedom of approved speech...
Brietbart is a very conservative guy. You should read about his Twitter comments concerning Ted Kennedy’s death.
Breitbart is a conservative. I believe he’s pals with Matt Drudge.
He was met at his home by SEVEN cops.
I would like to see photos of that bunch...
|
Where’s the ACLU?
What do you mean they agree with the arrest?
What this should teach us is NEVER to perform ANY political action without supportive witnesses and video cams (at least two, one with the action and one at a distance). As the Brownshirts get pushed they will get violent. Also the tapings are the beginnings of lawsuits which will make the leftists bleed a little.
And they behaved “stupidly”.
I am about the farthest thing from a liberal apologist. However, conservatism is based on logic and based on the rule of law.
By definition, a patriot is someone that fights for equal treatment thru the rule of law (hence freedom). An anarchist believes in breaking all the rules just to get their way.
Only a liberal would think it is alright to break the law just to get their point across. If you blindly support someone for unilaterally breaking the law, then you are certainly not a Patriot, but you may be a liberal.
Mr. Fuhre has visited the transition line between socialism and fascism.
|
This mural is on private property. However the OBAMA HOPE/CHANGE posters were wheatpasted on public property (ex. traffic light boxes) by Obamunists without prosecution.
And Barack Hussein Obama KNEW that would be the case when he hired Shepard Fairey to produce and distribute edgey campaign materials. Mr. Fairey has since been contacted by the NEA to produce State propaganda promoting Obama’s agenda.
But the media is SILENT. They lie by omission and act as if the RESPONSE comes out of nowhere. IT is likewise tactics.
And Alex Jones is a nut.
Did the HPD ever charge the famous California artist who put up the bigoted “KING OF BEERS - KING OF JEWS” billboard pasteup in Houston?
It was boasted of online but the media pretended they didn’t know the culprit who just happened to have an art show at The Station just up the street.
Yes.
The poor dear was only trying to do a little community organizing.
And if anyone thinks the same thing would have occurred if they guy was posting pro-Osama posters or “Eat at Joes”, you’re wrong.
Point.
Patriots don't break laws lightly.
I don’t think anyone has trashed the U.S. and only you seem to be advocating violating the law or blindly believing what you read. Get a clue!
You are a troll and nothing more.
Don’t bother responding to this guy. He just likes to take pot shots. He doesn’t want a discussion he wants destruction.
Ignoring him will be more effective
Doesn’t surprise me a bit. RagingElephants.com posted a signboard stating that Martin Luther King was a Republican. Lefties all over them in a New York minute and sign had to be taken down. We are not only a sanctuary city for illegals from the south but also for all the left wing nuts including Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee and Gene Green.
This has nothing do this with what the LIC (Liar-in-Chief) wants. This has to do with not knowing the whole story.
If the pro-Obama posters were on public property and allowed by the city then the anti-obama posters should also be allowed. However, if the pro-obama posters were only on private property with the consent of the property owners then the anti-obama posters do not have to be allowed on that same private property. This is about private property rights.
I damn sure don’t want some Obama supporter demanding that I post a pro-obama poster on my property just because I exercised my 1st amendment rights and displayed an anti-obama poster.
We still need to know the facts of this case before it is judged.
Here come the Brown Shirts.
Since he is obviously a troll just trying to make conservatives look like we don’t support following the law, is there a way to ban him from freepers? He makes us all look bad.
Unfortunately, I can’t judge without knowing more of this story.
Unfortunately your first sentence did exactly that.
There has got to be more to this story than is being reported.
You are probably thinking of Bloomberg News. Breitbart is new on the scene; Bloomberg’s been around awhile.
Dang, I knew there was some reason we keep losing.
Or “Hype”.
Yes, and he is not liberal, he may have been once. He has two sites Breitbart news and he one he posts the ACORN stuff on, biggovernment.com.
I disagree. I didn’t prematurely judge by indicating that there was more to the story. By “judging”, I was referring to the guilt or innocence of the arrest guy and the guilt or innocence of the police department. Since this article ONLY gives the perspective of the arrested guy then by default, we have not been given the FULL story.
Where is the arrest record or comments by the police department beyond the actual arrest charge? Therefore, my statement that we do not have all of the story is correct and I still have not judged who was wrong in this encounter.
Answer this question: Why did they throw him up against a car and haul him in. Last time I looked they gave you a ticket for posting stuff illegally, just like a traffic ticket. Sounds to me like some cops went overboard, AGAIN, on an arrest.
And where has he broken the law, Einstein? You do know that political speech is protected under the 1st amendment, right?
I’m confused. Where was there any vandalism? What property did he destroy? And since “when” does putting/taping fliers up on poles constitute criminal mischief or grafitti?
Besides, DemocRat Mayor Bill White must think that anyone that spray paints grafitti (which Fuhre did NOT do) is A-OK... since White passed an edict that punishes property owners to the tune of $500 per incident, if they do not remove the grafitti themselves, at their own cost. To me, that must mean that destruction of private property by grafitti is NOT a crime or even criminal mischief.
Am I off base here, or is this just another typical leftist double standard?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.