Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Davis Hanson: Dr. Barack and Mr. Obama - The backlash is sharp as voters learn that...
National Review Online ^ | September 18, 2009 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 09/18/2009 11:20:56 AM PDT by neverdem








Dr. Barack and Mr. Obama
The backlash is sharp as voters learn that Obama is not the man they thought he was.

By Victor Davis Hanson

No one imagined that Barack Obama, during his first nine months in office, would be falling in the polls even faster than George W. Bush did prior to 9/11. We all knew what Obama’s weaknesses were as he came into office — a lack of experience in foreign affairs, little knowledge of how private business works, and poor judgment concerning the extremist company he had kept in the past.

But given the unhappiness over the war, the September 2008 financial meltdown, the animosity toward Bush, and the lackluster Republican campaign, millions of moderates and conservative Democrats were willing to give the unconventional Obama a chance.

Voters wanted political change — anything other than the status quo. They warmed to the idea that in their generation America would elect its first black president. When the most partisan member of the U.S. Senate started sounding like the least partisan, they believed him.

There was a sense of reassurance that Obama was a healer. He was a transcendent figure that would bring us together at home and make us better liked, and perhaps thereby more secure, abroad. People assumed that his easy rhetoric was not a result of studied preparation or superficial style, but a natural reflection of honesty and sincerity. So Obama was elected and enjoyed quite a 90-day honeymoon in an atmosphere of promised transparency and togetherness. A “god,” a Newsweek editor called him.

Now nearly half the country is not merely distrustful of him, but increasingly viscerally angry at him as well. Actually, “him” is a construct: At times there seems to be no “him.” Instead, the people don’t know whether the kindly Dr. Barack is their president, or his unpredictable double, Mr. Obama.

They never expected the president to show mastery of economic affairs or reveal much expertise in matters abroad, and accordingly were not disappointed when he did not. His critics concede that he inherited two wars and a dismal economy, though they argue that he may be making these bad situations far worse.

Instead, the real anger from independents arises over disappointment, false merchandising, and hypocrisy. It is real and deep — as is true of any animosity that arises from a sense of betrayal of former trust. You see, it took millions of Americans months of fair and judicious examination to conclude that Obama’s real weaknesses were his once-advertised strengths: He seems not a healer at all; he is not particularly sincere; and he is not especially veracious. Someone other than the man who ran for president is sometimes occupying the Oval Office: The present Mr. Obama looks and sounds like the old Dr. Barack, but he surely does not act anything like the candidate who persuaded America.

When thousands of loud protesters went to tea parties and town halls, the people wanted the self-advertised purple-state Obama, the old organizer, in good nature to laugh that he was being out-organized — not to unleash lackeys to call the concerned activists mobs and brownshirts. When the crude Rep. Joe Wilson shouted, “You lie!” the people wanted their transcendent Obama to remind us all that we should not sound off like either a Joe Wilson or a Van Jones, if we wish to engage in responsible debate. Instead, Obama went back into campaign mode, alleging fabrication on the part of his opponents, even as he fabricated many of his own talking points. 

Health care would prove to be Obama’s perfect storm, bringing out all of these disturbing revelations at once. In serial fashion, Obama has accused his opponents of lying and distortion — and yet himself still cannot clearly demonstrate in detail whether our existing health plans will change, whether illegal aliens will be included in his reform, how we are to pay for this new entitlement, and why there is need for revolutionary change in the next 60 days. 

Obama has given us several figures on the number of uninsured; they change weekly. There was to be a public option; now there is not; and then there is sort of not one. He knows no more than we do what exactly lies hidden in a 1,000-page plan.

Tort reform? Perhaps; but not likely; or is it suddenly kind of? A bigger deficit? Not by a dime — as if more people can get better coverage (remember no rationing!) at less cost. Billions in waste and fraud will soon be saved to pay the costs — if so, why not right now and banked instead?

In almost every statement on health care, Obama uses the conditional or optative mood (may, could, would, should, etc.). And for good reason: When he resorts to the indicative mood of fact he is rarely being fully truthful. The problem is existential: The American people like their health-care system and want it at most only tweaked. All the invocations of God, threats, distortion, and assigning of guilt over the dead to come cannot make them accept in a democracy what they do not trust or want.

Obama worked hard abroad to be liked, but it was a funny sort of charm offensive. He insulted the British in a variety of gratuitous and trivial ways, from poor gift giving to sending the bust of Churchill unceremoniously home. Democratic Israel is hardly an ally any longer. The constitutional government of Honduras is bullied, apparently because it acted in a constitutionally sober, but conservative, manner. The Eastern Europeans, traditionally among America’s staunchest friends, were strangely shorted in order to curry favor with the thuggish Vladimir Putin. 

To soothe the anger of the Islamic world, our sins were magnified, those of the Muslim world understated — and over 1,400 years, no less. The new president defamed his predecessor so often and to such a degree that even Obama’s supporters politely urged that he move on and get a life. When the ahistorical president indulged in historical reference, the result was analogous to a George W. Bush offering tutorials on rhetoric and oratory.

All this, the American people put up with on the expectation that Obama’s new directions, his stately apologies, and his airing of American sins and blunders would win over our enemies. Yet the exact opposite has followed. 

Iran is more bellicose than ever. It is emboldened by its unchecked progress in getting the bomb and by the ease with which it strangled a democratic reform movement, ignored by Obama himself. What ally wishes to join risky embargos and boycotts when at any moment Obama might cut their legs out from under them with yet another video or valentine sent to Tehran? 

Hugo Chávez is following suit. He grasps that the nuclear finagling that works for Iran can serve another dictatorial oil exporter just as well. If Iran is going to be the regional nuclear hegemon of the Persian Gulf, why not its friend Venezuela in Latin America? 

No one knows what is going on with North Korea. But we assume that it is not disappointed with America’s move away from missile defense or with a new trade war with our creditor China. It is not clear that the key governments of Britain, France, Germany, and Japan are any more pro-American now than they were in the days of Bush. Many may privately have preferred to safely caricature reliable old “smoke ’em out” and “dead or alive” George W. Bush than run the present risk of soaring along with “hope and change” and “this is our moment” Obama among the Iranians, Koreans, Syrians, and Venezuelans. In other words, Obama the healer has in kindly fashion estranged many of our friends and, by intent or not, encouraged our enemies.

Did Obama at least achieve togetherness on matters of race? A year ago most Americans thought his long association with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, his “typical white person” slur, and his crude stereotyping of rural Pennsylvanians were understandable aberrations, not revelations into the candidate’s inner character. Indeed, they expected the soft-spoken Obama to be a liberal version of Condoleezza Rice or Colin Powell: Matters racial would be incidental, not essential to the presidential worldview. 

But the president, in just nine months, has managed to ensure that race is on the verge of becoming more problematic than at any time in the last twenty years. As the president's polls dip, his supporters — scan the week’s network news shows —  cry out “racism” on spec, although empirically they have not made the case that the opposition to Obama is any more virulent than what was unleashed against Bush. Most, in fact, assume that what the Left did to Bush — mainstreaming hatred in respectable venues like Hollywood, The New Republic, Alfred Knopf, or MSNBC — the Right has not even approximated. I do not recall anyone suggesting that the Left’s often visceral anger at Condoleezza Rice revealed its own racism.

Instead, through a series of incidents, Obama himself has alienated — perhaps permanently — millions of swing voters. He need not have commented on a minor incident involving Professor Gates at Harvard. Instead, the president pontificated on racial stereotyping and accused the local police of acting stupidly. Most people of all races disagreed, and felt that Obama’s friend had himself gratuitously insulted the officer and played on his position and contacts to construct a dramatic and self-serving “teachable moment.” Would the president now editorialize on all, some, or no more publicized racial confrontations?

Obama appointed a racialist to a White House position. When it was revealed that Van Jones had alleged that white people were racial polluters and were more likely to commit Columbine-like massacres in schools, Obama said not a word in opposition to his venom — akin to his initial ambiguity over the revelations about his own crude pastor. 

When the New York governor and a number of prominent House Democrats — most notoriously the ethically challenged Rep. Charles Rangel — played the race card, Obama voted present and said not a word. Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder, accused his fellow countrymen of being cowards, because of their alleged reluctance to discuss race under the only conditions that Holder would consider fair. None of these incidents alone was important; but collectively they confirmed doubts from last year’s campaign.

So now we are reduced to a new polarization in which African-American elites are portrayed as more racially sensitive than ever, and quicker to allege bias as the first explanation of discontent. Indeed, a melodramatic congressman has now charged that we are back to the days of night riders in sheets harassing African Americans.

In turn, there is a new simmering on the part of the working classes, as they hear ad nauseam replays of the vulgar Van Jones anti-white accusations, and as they wonder whether the unseemly outbursts — splashed 24/7 on the Internet — of the prominent and successful Serena Williams and Kanye West (who has a history of racial polarization) are emblems of America’s new racial anger and coarseness. All that leaves them confused — and increasingly angry themselves that their healer is more part of the problem than the solution.

Why is Barack Obama sinking in the polls in a fashion beyond the easy remedy of more hope-and-change elixirs? 

The people were willing to overlook his weaknesses, given his obvious strengths. But when after months of fair examination they concluded his purported plusses were even greater liabilities than his flaws, they began to see him not merely as unimpressive, but perhaps even as unappealing — to a degree we have not seen often during the first year of a presidency.

Obama’s real problem is not conservative rabble-rousers at town halls or Republican activists. Rather, it is the Democratic rank and file. They may rewarm with an improving economy, but for now they  are discovering that just as Obama could take them individually to great heights last fall, so too he could soon bring them down collectively to unprecedented depths.

— NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal. © 2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backlash; bho44; bhohealthcare; healthcare; medicalcare; obama; third100days; vdh; victordavishanson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: neverdem

At one time the Middle East conflict, Arabs vs. Israel was the big worry. Since the election of Obama a new Middle East conflict is taking place, and it is in America. Democrats (Arabs) vs. Republicans (Israel) and it is a much larger and more serious worry.


21 posted on 09/18/2009 12:45:16 PM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SJackson
He insulted the British in a variety of gratuitous and trivial ways, from poor gift giving to sending the bust of Churchill unceremoniously home.

Democratic Israel is hardly an ally any longer. The constitutional government of Honduras is bullied, apparently because it acted in a constitutionally sober, but conservative, manner.

The Eastern Europeans, traditionally among America’s staunchest friends, were strangely shorted in order to curry favor with the thuggish Vladimir Putin.

And still, the American press loves him...

22 posted on 09/18/2009 12:50:05 PM PDT by GOPJ ( UNITED WAY SUPPORTS ACORN - - STOP DONATING TODAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawnn

Do as I say, not as I do!


23 posted on 09/18/2009 12:50:30 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NHResident
” new polarization in which African-American elites are portrayed as more racially sensitive than ever, and quicker to allege bias as the first explanation of discontent” - even Bill Crosby - a multi-millionaire due in large part becaus of his embrace by and popularity by a white public has jumped on and played the race card. He should be ashamed.

Ashamed?!?!?! Not the Cos. Ever see a white adult male portrayed as anything other than a heavy or a fool on any of his shows?

24 posted on 09/18/2009 12:55:39 PM PDT by Roccus (My anger is manufactured.......................................in the WHITE HOUSE and CONGRESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

Not to worry.
His numbers will SURGE once he is “tested.”
Biden warned us that he would be tested during his first few months in office by some type of crisis.
It is PLANNED and will happen!


25 posted on 09/18/2009 12:55:42 PM PDT by Muzzle_em (BO STINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TurtleUp

Verbose. Should say: “We all knew Obama’s weakness as he came into office — a total lack of qualifications.””

We still have not seen a real birth certificate, either.


26 posted on 09/18/2009 1:04:34 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The electorate also voted for a man who they believed was articulate and inspiring and what they got was someone who is not confident in speaking without a teleprompter, a person incapable of reflecting on issues without resorting to partisan talking points or jokes attempting to ridicule his opponents, and a political extremist who cannot explain, let alone sell, even his most cherished ideas.


27 posted on 09/18/2009 1:23:39 PM PDT by Gritty-Kitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
In his campaign speeches,the security force better equipped than our Army, his intention to fundamentally change America, and his redistribution, the statement saying we would have to give up our 68-73 comfort range and bear some uncomfortable temperatures, along with his Socialist agenda items ... how could we not know what his intentions were/are?

Wake UP! Take notice! Look at his tzar's/czar's, and the type associates he has appointed to offices ... Ayers,, Van Jones. Holder ...etc.IE Sotomyer

God help us in our day, in Jesus name. Amen.

28 posted on 09/18/2009 1:28:05 PM PDT by Countyline (God loves you ... He wants you to love Him back; to learn of Him and obey His commands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Why is Barack Obama sinking in the polls in a fashion beyond the easy remedy of more hope-and-change elixirs? "

You can't fool ALL of the people ALL of the time.
He has cried wolf now TOO MANY times when caught in associations
with questionable and radical extremist characters.
This latest card they have played on why they think people
oppose Obamacare and the president has jumped the shark.

29 posted on 09/18/2009 1:30:31 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I believe Obama had just accused his critics of being liars before Joe Wilson yelled out, "You lie!"
30 posted on 09/18/2009 1:57:53 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
In almost every statement on health care, Obama uses the conditional or optative mood (may, could, would, should, etc.).

I always learn something from Professor Hanson.

31 posted on 09/18/2009 2:46:50 PM PDT by AZLiberty (Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happygrl

Perhaps we’ll have an impeachable moment or two (one in the House and one in the Senate) after the 2010 election?


32 posted on 09/18/2009 3:12:09 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: happygrl

And we’ll be rid of him!


33 posted on 09/18/2009 3:13:04 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

Well, he has managed to wake up some sleeping Americans and pi$$ off a lot of voters.

Those are good things, IMHO!


34 posted on 09/18/2009 3:15:20 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

A nice summation from VDH for all those who voted for the conciliatory, politically pragmatic & fiscally responsible racial & global healer they saw during the campaign & have belatedly woken to the rude reality that an openly leftist, manic-spending, race-baiting, obnoxiously hyperpartisan sanctimonious prig intent on obsequiously kowtowing to every last one of the world's murderous tyants & kleptocratic dictators is the one who actually showed up in the Oval Office on Inauguration Day.

Getting bit by a bait & switch scam is always a bummer, but most of us here didn't fall for the ruse.

I do take issue with VDH lumping in Serena & Kanye with the likes of Gates & Wright et al, though. Williams & West are just overpampered, overpaid celebrities who happen to be black and as we all know, boorish foul-mouthed narcissistic celebs come in all colors. Just ask John McEnroe & Rosie O'Donnell!

35 posted on 09/18/2009 3:17:14 PM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Brilliant- as VDH nearly always is- thanks for posting.


36 posted on 09/18/2009 3:18:19 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He’s likely to make himself a lame duck by Christmas. Not that he might not get re-elected, but that everything issuing from this administration is so ridiculous, that the people who actually run the government are having to ignore him in order to keep the doors open and the lights on.

He is discovering the truth of what Harry S. Truman said about ordering that this and that be done and heels are clicked and yes sir is said but then nothing happens.


37 posted on 09/18/2009 3:37:04 PM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

We were talking about that back during the campaign, whether he would push things too far Left and trigger a conservative backlash. One of the neocon pundits didn’t think so, but now we know.


38 posted on 09/18/2009 3:40:48 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

These defund ACORN votes tell me that the congress has gotten the message, despite their snarls of anger, and are trying to curry favor among their electorate. Doubt if its going to work. Like 94, the damage is done and, given their nature, there will be plenty more reminders before the election. Relying on voter memory is effective sometimes. Not this time.


39 posted on 09/18/2009 3:43:26 PM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: leilani

I’ll give Serena a break, but West has been doin the race hustle since he was in short pants.


40 posted on 09/18/2009 3:44:39 PM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson