Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capt. Connie Rhodes says she never OK'd appeal (CONFIRMED)
Columbus (GA) Ledger-Enquirer ^ | 9/19/09 | ALAN RIQUELMY

Posted on 09/19/2009 11:29:41 AM PDT by jamese777

Army Capt. Connie Rhodes, who filed a complaint Sept. 4 in U.S. District Court that sought to stop her deployment to Iraq by arguing that President Barack Obama can’t legitimately hold office, says in a Friday letter that she never authorized her attorney to appeal a Wednesday ruling against her.

Additionally, Judge Clay Land – who denied Rhodes’ request and threatened sanctions against her lawyer, Orly Taitz, a national figure in the “birther” movement – states that Taitz has two weeks from Friday to explain why he shouldn’t impose a $10,000 penalty against the California lawyer.

Both Land’s order and Rhodes’ letter came on the heels of a Thursday request from the captain that Land reconsider his Wednesday order against her. In that order, Land called Rhodes’ Sept. 4 complaint “frivolous,” and says Taitz could face sanctions if she ever again filed in his court a similar frivolous action. In her Friday letter, Rhodes states that she never told Taitz to file for a reconsideration, and that she intends to formally complain about her attorney.

“I became aware on last night’s local news cast that a motion to stay my deployment had been entered on my behalf,” Rhodes’ Friday to Land states. “I did not authorize this motion to be filed.

“Furthermore, I do not wish for Ms. Taitz to file any future motions or represent me in any way in this court. It is my plan to file a complaint with the California State Bar due to her reprehensible and unprofessional actions,” Rhodes states.

Rhodes says she is currently deploying to Iraq, and that it’s evident her initial complaint was “full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ledger-enquirer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; connierhodes; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101 next last
This is a follow up to yesterday's articles and comments suggesting that the letter from Captain Rhodes may have been a forgery.
1 posted on 09/19/2009 11:29:41 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Where is the followup, ace? THis is a rehash of “her” letter.


2 posted on 09/19/2009 11:31:22 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Please point out the “confirmation” part of this


3 posted on 09/19/2009 11:33:10 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

IS LETTER TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LAND A FORGERY?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2343741/posts


4 posted on 09/19/2009 11:34:13 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Can you remove the “Confirmed” from the title, since this article does not do that, but rather rehashes the supposed letter itself.


5 posted on 09/19/2009 11:35:58 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I heard there were other lawyers were working with Orly on this case. One of the primary reasons for the other lawyers I thought was because Orly seemed to have a problem with proper protocol. If so how did this become such a mess?


6 posted on 09/19/2009 11:37:40 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2; Fred Nerks; BuckeyeTexan; LucyT

It’s getting press, but is it real?


7 posted on 09/19/2009 11:40:01 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

see post 4 link.


8 posted on 09/19/2009 11:41:17 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

I think the other lawyers are HOPEFULLY working on the case with Judge Carter in CA. The Carter case is a gift. Orly and gary Kreep have a real shot there.

Leo Donofrio posted important info about how Orly and Kreep have a new huge opening thanks to Obama’s DOJ lawyers screwing up big time. Orly needs to focus on the Judge Carter case and read Leo Donofrio’s web site twice a day as Leo is doing the best research on the BC/NBC issue.


9 posted on 09/19/2009 11:41:59 AM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

GO to link in post 4. Fishy stuff


10 posted on 09/19/2009 11:43:06 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Beuhler? Beuhler?


11 posted on 09/19/2009 11:46:22 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It maybe fishy stuff but has Captain Rhodes or Orly denied that the info posted by the Newspaper is not legit? I’ve seen nothing and normally Orly is all of her blog with denials if she doen’t think something is correct.

If it isn’t legit then the Judge will be pissed to no end. Who would fax or fake a letter to the Judge?


12 posted on 09/19/2009 11:48:01 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: deport

An Obamarrhoid.


13 posted on 09/19/2009 11:49:18 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

I heard there were other lawyers were working with Orly on this case. One of the primary reasons for the other lawyers I thought was because Orly seemed to have a problem with proper protocol. If so how did this become such a mess?


Kreep is a co-counsel in the CA case. The Georgia case as far as I know is Orly alone, thus the screwed up mess.


14 posted on 09/19/2009 11:50:18 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Then why hasn’t the Captain or Orly denied the fax and stated it is a fraud?.....


15 posted on 09/19/2009 11:52:23 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: deport

Has anyone talked to the Captain in (probably in Kuwait by now) or Orly? Where they even aware of it before now?


16 posted on 09/19/2009 11:54:16 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant; BP2; Fred Nerks; LucyT

Do you have any credible evidence that the letter was a forgery? Where is this accusation coming from?


17 posted on 09/19/2009 11:59:32 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Read my other ping to you. It’s our buddy Larry


18 posted on 09/19/2009 12:00:23 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Pissant, I’m on your side, as you know, but didn’t Land fine Taitz $10,000 over this, or something of that nature? Or isn’t there any independent confirmation of that either? I’m not giving you a hard time....


19 posted on 09/19/2009 12:01:14 PM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Yeah, well proper protocol is constitutional and statutory law as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local Rules of the Federal District Court for the Middle District of GA (USDC-MDGA). I do not believe that she is admitted to practice in GA,, so she would likely have been collaborating with a local attorney in Columbus GA who was admitted to practice before the USDC-MDGA, who in effect would sponsor her appearance pro hac vice (appearance for limited purpose by an attorney not admitted otherwise).

Every pleading I have seen by Taitz has been unusual to say the least, sloppy and scattershot might be a better term for it.

It's often said that someone can be fortunate for having a particular set of enemies, because those enemies discredit themselves and the substantive allegations they make disappear with their personal credibility.

You have to be agnostic on the subject of Obama's natural citizenship - because none of the facts are in evidence (the supposed birth certificate has been sealed and not released to the public, or to any credible neutral who might verify it). Doing a sloppy job of pursuing these cases only jaundices the public eye on the topic of the substantive validity of the citizenship claims, even though no evidence (pro or con) has been adduced. Taitz should step out of this effort and others should only move ahead in court when they can surmount the very difficult issues of jurisdiction and standing (which I would say, and have said here, are just about impossible). What most people, mainly non-lawyers, have a hard time understanding is that the Constitution could prescribe a thin set of minimal qualifications for serving as President, yet fail to provide for a method of verifying or verifying those qualifications have been met.

20 posted on 09/19/2009 12:01:57 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The proper way to end your relationship with your legal counsel is to ask your attorney to send you your files. That way there is no ambiguity about the representation.

Did Capt. Rhodes request her legal files from Dr. Taitz or did she blindside Dr. Taitz?

21 posted on 09/19/2009 12:02:35 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (Clever tagline can only be seen on the other internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Not over THIS supposed letter, no. Rather, it was over her filing a motion to vacate his previous decision.


22 posted on 09/19/2009 12:03:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Leo Donofrio has repeatedly said Orly's case has “no chance” (I disagree). Leo is only interested in a tiny obscure opportunity for a speck of discovery that would be helpful to Leo if he files his long awaited quo warranto case in DC, assuming he can get a client with standing to contact him.

Frankly, Leo appears to have jumped the shark on this and be grandstanding and showing off his legal smarts.

I'm not a lawyer, but I played one for five years during a custody dispute (I actually got my ex-wife’s lawyer sanctioned by the judge for frivolously charging me with criminal nonpayment of chld support...on the way to being hit with $40,000 of my ex-wife’s legal fees as a pro se in the custody trial...don't try this at home). My impression is that Leo's proposal for pre-MTD discovery has zero chance of being ordered by Nakazato and even if ordered couldn't be completed before the Oct. 5 hearing on MTD.

23 posted on 09/19/2009 12:04:39 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant

OK. I thought the issue was that she was acting without her client’s authorization, not the mere fact that she filed a motion to vacate. Could she be sanctioned just because the judge is annoyed with her? Weird.


24 posted on 09/19/2009 12:05:53 PM PDT by Genoa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Is this over zealous lawyer or efforts to discredit lawyer? Isn’t Orly Taz (?) the lawyer on this?


25 posted on 09/19/2009 12:06:33 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

how long before Taitz gets sued for Malpractice.


26 posted on 09/19/2009 12:08:17 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
This is what interests me. It seems like a gift from Judge Carter.
27 posted on 09/19/2009 12:08:46 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (\/\/|-|3R3 15 7|-|3 b1R7|-| (3R71Ph1(473?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Do you have any credible evidence that the letter was a forgery? Where is this accusation coming from?


It’s being claimed as a cut/paste signature forgery on the faxed copy that is available from various sources including the paper that has this article today. My belief is that something that is getting this much attention would have Orly’s attention by now and she’d have it plastered all over her blog if it was a fake. Many people are hanging onto every detail and would be burning up her phone, email, blog, etc with this info. The Captain is enroute overseas but then again I’d bet she has email, phone, text or other means of being alerted....


28 posted on 09/19/2009 12:09:06 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

His legal smarts evidently weren’t smart enough to know you don’t send interrogatories to Congress in this case..and evidently his smarts don’t tell him that the fact that Obama Sr was a bigamist is germaine to the British citizenship issue.


29 posted on 09/19/2009 12:11:40 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Go to the bottom in Conclusion section of this order for the Judge’s threat. Orly has 14 days to respond and who know what the judge may or will do.

http://media.ledger-enquirer.com/smedia/2009/09/19/11/land_rebuke.source.prod_affiliate.70.pdf


30 posted on 09/19/2009 12:12:36 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
thanks. I agree with you.
The constitution sets guide lines on how to create law it isn't the law itself. The verification process should of been set into US code two hundred years ago but it wasn't. Now we could in theory have Putin as our next president.
31 posted on 09/19/2009 12:20:40 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
"Now we could in theory have Putin as our next president.

We just announced were not going to install a missile shield in eastern Europe. Who's to say Putin's not president already?

32 posted on 09/19/2009 12:25:24 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I reply again...
Even more interesting. If you look at where this fax was sent from, Office Max, at 1:58PM (the date she shipped out to Iraq), Using White Pages, reverse look-up of the phone number 706-563-3441, it is shown to be a landline, does not specify a business, and in located in Columbus, GA. Now she was leaving that day from Fort Gordon, GA. Google maps says that location is 245 miles away from Fort Gordon, Ga.
1. How can she travel that far from the base on a day she will deploy. Most orders require you on base and ready to go 24 hours in advance of a flight.
2. Why would she fax this from a location so far away on the day she would deploy, when fax machines are on base.
3. When would she decide to write this note, as she was dissappointed by the ruling, and standard procedure is to appeal a decision. Certainly this was discussed. IF she did not want to appeal, doesn’t it make sense that this letter would go to Orly Taitz? and not the Judge?
4. There is no mention that she contacted Orly Taitz to stop the filing, only to the judge...sound fishy?
5. Finally, I find it interesting that we have not heard from the Captain as she said she would contact the California Bar and file a complaint. so far, no complaint.
and most telling of all, is that she is, for now, incommunicado, more than likely traveling to her duty station.

To the protagonist:
What better way to throw a monkeywrench into the works, than to float a fake, it does not matter if its real or not, perception fuels those who do not want her to succeed, and if its not real and the Captain knows nothing about it, the damage is done.
To them, the worst thing that can happen is for everybody to take a wait and see attitude over this.

As has already been shown, the court clerk sent back the order as it apparently was filled out incorrectly. So how could the judge “Apparently” presume a $10K fine, if no such paperwork has been entered into the court???

Facts are Facts, but PERCEPTION is reality...remember that.
they have...


33 posted on 09/19/2009 12:36:22 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

See my proposed scenario over here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2343741/posts?page=1#24


34 posted on 09/19/2009 12:41:23 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

Office Max
Not Rated | Write a Review
3201 Macon Road, # 275, Columbus, GA 31906 zip code
Click here for Office Max Website
PhonePhone |More Info | Map it
(706) 563-5284
(706) 563-3441 (fax)


Now not sure why she’d be that far from Fort Gordon is that was her deployment site.


35 posted on 09/19/2009 12:50:04 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
“This” (Leo's post claiming a discovery opportunity) is exactly what I was referring to. You have to look past Leo's self-important huffing and puffing to get to what he is actually suggesting.

Judge Carter had nothing to do with this. It appears that case law requires DOJ’s motion to limit discovery regarding a motion to dismiss (MTD) must include language that allows limited discovery by Orly's plaintiffs that is only in direct support of establishing “standing” needed by plaintiffs to defeat the MTD.

Leo claims that DOJ screwed up when they specifically referenced the congressional vote to certify the electoral college vote in their motion, and mere mention of this event in support of Obama’s de facto current status as president has opened an opportunity for Orly to do discovery on whether objections were properly allowed before that vote was certified.

Leo repeatedly states in the comments that Orly's case has no hope of even surviving the MTD on Oct 5, and that it won't survive an appeal even if Carter rules for Orly's plaintiff(s). Leo only suggests that prior to that MTD hearing there is an opportunity for Orly to request Magistrate Nakazato to order limited discovery.

I think it is fairly obvious that if such a discovery request was granted by Nakazato, it would be appealed and at the least, the Oct. 5 MDT hearing would be delayed. October 5 is also the day that broad discovery for the whole trial will be ordered if the MTD is denied, and I doubt Orly will want to risk that to go on Leo's wild goose chase, intellectually stimulating though that might be.

But hey, I'm not a lawyer so your mileage may vary...

36 posted on 09/19/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thanks, It verifies that she indeed was in Columbus, GA, 245 miles away from her flight “that day”, Fort Gordon, GA was where her flight left from, and she is not currently confirming this, also the signature, is underlined in Pen, yet typed otherwise, and is crooked. If this has skewed in the fax machine, you would see the edges of the paper, which are not evident if it was a roller system.
Office Max offers flat panel reading for single page fax as well, but this usually shows background unless another clean sheet is put in back while faxing. Also not evident.

It looks like someone made a fake. And took the signature from another signed document available on the internet, and simply underlined her name. Note the darker line than the darkness of the signature. I think its a fake.

Evidently the court clerk refused Taitz refiling for clerical errors as well, so the reports of a 10K fine was probably bogus as well, probably assumed because of the Hemenway Sanction...we will see...


37 posted on 09/19/2009 1:03:00 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

He gave her 14 days to respond and noted he may impose a fine.

http://media.ledger-enquirer.com/smedia/2009/09/19/11/land_rebuke.source.prod_affiliate.70.pdf

CONCLUSION
The Court finds Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay of Deployment (Doc.
15) to be frivolous. Therefore, it is denied. The Court notifies
Plaintiff’s counsel, Orly Taitz, that it is contemplating a monetary
penalty of $10,000.00 to be imposed upon her, as a sanction for her misconduct. Ms. Taitz shall file her response within fourteen days
of today’s order showing why this sanction should not be imposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of September, 2009.

S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


38 posted on 09/19/2009 1:07:43 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

Wasn’t she supposed to be in Fort Benning, GA which is only a few miles 15 or so from Columbus? Where are you getting Fort Gordon? I understood her unit was to be at Fort Benning for deployment.


39 posted on 09/19/2009 1:16:12 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Leo was corrected that immediately and changed his proposed discovery from interrogatories to depositions, I'll give him credit for that much.

Leo's claim to fame is the issue of Obama’s claimed dual citizenship at birth. There would be no dual citizenship under my understanding of the BNA of 1948 if Obama’s parents either were never legally married in HI or if that marriage could be legally proved to be bigamous.

So to protect his own interest and narrow focus on his blog, Leo has walled off discussion of Obama’s legitimacy (he told me it is a smear to question it) or even to suggest that Obama Sr’s prior “tribal” marriage would indicate bigamy.

Leo says Obama’s agents stipulated Obama’s dual citizenship “against interest” (unforced error), so we should just hit him over the head with it, unless he tries to deny it.

40 posted on 09/19/2009 1:17:54 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

I reply again...
Even more interesting. If you look at where this fax was sent from, Office Max, at 1:58PM (the date she shipped out to Iraq), Using White Pages, reverse look-up of the phone number 706-563-3441, it is shown to be a landline, does not specify a business, and in located in Columbus, GA. Now she was leaving that day from Fort Gordon, GA. Google maps says that location is 245 miles away from Fort Gordon, Ga.
1. How can she travel that far from the base on a day she will deploy. Most orders require you on base and ready to go 24 hours in advance of a flight.
2. Why would she fax this from a location so far away on the day she would deploy, when fax machines are on base.
3. When would she decide to write this note, as she was dissappointed by the ruling, and standard procedure is to appeal a decision. Certainly this was discussed. IF she did not want to appeal, doesn’t it make sense that this letter would go to Orly Taitz? and not the Judge?
4. There is no mention that she contacted Orly Taitz to stop the filing, only to the judge...sound fishy?
5. Finally, I find it interesting that we have not heard from the Captain as she said she would contact the California Bar and file a complaint. so far, no complaint.
and most telling of all, is that she is, for now, incommunicado, more than likely traveling to her duty station.

To the protagonist:
What better way to throw a monkeywrench into the works, than to float a fake, it does not matter if its real or not, perception fuels those who do not want her to succeed, and if its not real and the Captain knows nothing about it, the damage is done.
To them, the worst thing that can happen is for everybody to take a wait and see attitude over this.

As has already been shown, the court clerk sent back the order as it apparently was filled out incorrectly. So how could the judge “Apparently” presume a $10K fine, if no such paperwork has been entered into the court???

Facts are Facts, but PERCEPTION is reality...remember that.
they have...


I’m sure that Orly Taitz and Captain Rhodes will respond if the letter to Judge Land is a fake.
No matter where Captain Rhodes is at the moment, she can call a media outlet and refute the letter.


41 posted on 09/19/2009 1:18:01 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Where is the “confirmed” part of this?


42 posted on 09/19/2009 1:35:35 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I haven’t seen convincing evidence either way, whether this is a fake or not. But I suspect that it’s real.

The likeliest thing is that there was confusion or last minute changes of mind. Likely Capt. Rhodes’s commander ordered to go NOW or suffer the consequences, and so she decided to go. As to who failed to dot the i or cross the t, Taitz or Rhodes, I don’t know.

But I don’t think Taitz would have gone forward if she had known that Rhodes was dropping out. And probably she had no reason to think that Rhodes was going to drop out when she went ahead with it. We already know that her commanders were putting a lot of pressure on Rhodes, probably coming down from above.

I fail to see, however, why this is a fineable offense. If true, it was merely a misunderstanding. This judge is a political animal of the worst kind.


43 posted on 09/19/2009 2:12:01 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

But Larry also confirmed that no fax was SENT from that phone number at that time.


44 posted on 09/19/2009 2:29:37 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Where is the “confirmed” part of this?


You might want to email the reporter from the Columbus, Georgia newspaper with your question.
ariquelmy@ledger-enquirer.com


45 posted on 09/19/2009 2:55:00 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

He editorialized on an FR thread’s headline? I usually assume it’s the freeper posting it.


46 posted on 09/19/2009 4:44:02 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

If you’ve been following the Rhodes letter threads, the letter may be a forgery for a variety of reasons. I request that the “(CONFIRMED)” be removed in the title until confirmation. This article is a rehash of what we know.


47 posted on 09/19/2009 4:55:53 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

You sound like me, durnit


48 posted on 09/19/2009 5:00:03 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Just trying to keep the Troooooolls honest. ;^)


49 posted on 09/19/2009 5:02:02 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

FUnny how Larry Sinclair is far more interested in the truth than a bunch of freepers.


50 posted on 09/19/2009 5:03:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson