Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

Okay. What? I think I have to be lawyer just to read the thread title. Someone break this down to non-lawyer English for me.


12 posted on 09/21/2009 10:26:56 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReneeLynn

Orly filed a reponse to the DOJ lawyers trying to get the case in front of Judge Carter dismissed. They screwed up. LEo point out how the DOJ lawyers gave Orly a big opening. See on Leo’s site. After reading the first page it should be more clear.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/barnes-v-obama-important-discovery-is-available-now-according-to-judge-carters-order-of-sept-17-2009/


13 posted on 09/21/2009 10:37:09 PM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ReneeLynn

>>> Okay. What? I think I have to be lawyer just to read the thread title. Someone break this down to non-lawyer English for me.

I’m not a lawyer, but I understood the arguments.
The response makes an excellent case that this “legal standing” stuff is a bunch of BS.

In a nutshell, it says that the defendant’s motion to dismiss quotes no law or constitutional grounds for it’s claims...

and that the constitution provides for “THE PEOPLE” to have redress through the courts when elected officials and bodies (congress) fails to carry out it’s constitutional duty.

And that the courts are given the power to assert process where the constitution is vague. (i.e. no process for verification)

The majority of the response explained in detail with examples and powerful arguments why this whole process and history of other cases demonstrates that the defendant is hiding something, and most importantly that THE PEOPLE have every right to challenge constitutionality through the courts according to the 1st and 9th ammendments.


17 posted on 09/21/2009 10:50:48 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ReneeLynn
Someone break this down to non-lawyer English for me.

I think it could mean that Taitz and Alan Keyes may have kicked the DOJ's butts all the way back to DC from Santa Ana California. We'll have wait and see what the Judge thinks though.

48 posted on 09/21/2009 11:45:45 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ReneeLynn

In a nutshell, the response is saying that Congress and the Electoral College failed in its duty to determine the eligibility of Obama to be POTUS and that because they failed in their duty, the people have the right to demand that the zero’s qualifications be presented for public examination.


95 posted on 09/22/2009 6:38:48 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson