Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sibre Fan

Good summary. Orly has, once again, filed a brief which is long on rhetoric but short on responses to the precedents relied upon in the defendants’ brief. I have no crystal ball, but my years of experience litigating cases in federal court tell me that those who are putting all their hopes on Judge Carter may be disappointed come October 5. But time will tell.


143 posted on 09/22/2009 11:42:31 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
Orly has, once again, filed a brief which is long on rhetoric but short on responses to the precedents relied upon in the defendants’ brief.

She is refreshingly up front about this, stating (p.6):
"The question is not one of precedent, the question is whether politics dictate the outcome in many or most Obama-related cases, where avoiding discovery and fact-finding is the primary (and outcome-determinative) goal."

That's why I think that the question is whether Judge Carter will find that, "for the greater good," he can (or must) ignore the rules/precedent. That's, in a nutshell, what she is asking him to do.

And yes, only time will tell whether he determines that this issue is of such historic importance, that he can do as she requests.
144 posted on 09/22/2009 11:56:15 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Good summary. Orly has, once again, filed a brief which is long on rhetoric but short on responses to the precedents relied upon in the defendants’ brief. I have no crystal ball, but my years of experience litigating cases in federal court tell me that those who are putting all their hopes on Judge Carter may be disappointed come October 5. But time will tell.

And she will, once again, brook no competition.

From her blog:

Important

Whatever documents I have, I make public immediately. This is important for the whole country. When I got the registrar and hospital birth certificates from Kenya, I made those public. Leo Donofrio claims that he has information from HI, that Obama’s birth certificate was amended. He should make this information public, he needs to post the document with the statement that it is amended together with the declaration of the person, who obtained this record, testifying under penalty of perjury that it is the true and correct copy of the document . It is too important not to be disclosed. We can include it in the second amended complaint. This is what I got from the Journalist Devvy Kidd.

(There follows open source research by Kidd)

If this is so important to the whole country, Ms. Taitz, why not contact Leo Donofrio, directly, rather than urging your minions to do so?

Furthermore, I don't remember Donofrio stating he had any "document."

146 posted on 09/22/2009 12:06:32 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson