Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book: Bush favored cap and trade
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2009-09-24 | Eric Zimmermann

Posted on 09/24/2009 2:34:26 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

President Bush favored cap and trade, one of this former speechwriters claims in a new book.

In fact, Matt Latimer writes in "Speechless," the President actually ENDORSED the policy in a speech, but no one in the press could figure out what he meant.

Cap-and-trade, which would put a limit on businesses' carbon emissions, barely passed the House this year but has yet to make headway in the Senate. Most Republicans are vocally opposed to it.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: agw; bookreview; bush; capandtax; capandtrade; energy; garbage; globalwarming; latimer; mattlatimer; obamabot; oohahh; rino; rubbish; speechless; tellall; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: rabscuttle385

The last few years of Bush was a pure disaster.


41 posted on 09/24/2009 3:49:01 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

I’m not aware of what hie prescription drug policy was or how it was wrong. Please enlighten me.


42 posted on 09/24/2009 3:50:18 PM PDT by Tempest (I believe in the sanctity of life... As long as you can afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tempest; RatRipper
I’m not aware of what hie prescription drug policy was or how it was wrong. Please enlighten me.

Medicare Part D.

Another Big Government production brought to you by Bush and the RINO Party.


43 posted on 09/24/2009 3:51:47 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Kick corrupt Democrats *AND* Republicans out of office in 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
And what were they , exactly, except for the war ?

The war, both theaters, was enough.

Everything else is as nothing without the security to be able to argue about them.

The pride in ourselves as Americans, even though the left chipped that away from a majority, was gravy.

44 posted on 09/24/2009 3:59:20 PM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
There ain't no meat on that chicken.
45 posted on 09/24/2009 4:30:08 PM PDT by 4woodenboats (Obama's got those waaaaaahhhhh waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhsssssss!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

He never supported carbon taxes, cap and trade, or mandatory carbon limits. He endorsed large investments in nuclear plants, bio fuel subsidies and mandates (a huge policy mistake), and renewable subsidies. I agree with his approach generally. He wanted demonstratable technology developed first before committing to any CO2 reductions. The Chinese and Indian governments are pursuing the same approach although they are stressing massive solar and wind projects, probably boondoggles.


46 posted on 09/24/2009 4:32:34 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
That's exactly the essence of the current situation: eight years of a socialist, big-government "Republican" are followed by the presidency of communist "Democrat."

It is little wonder they have much in common: cap-and-trade, open borders, amnesty...

47 posted on 09/24/2009 4:36:49 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
Thanx rabscuttle385 !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

48 posted on 09/24/2009 4:44:32 PM PDT by steelyourfaith ("Power is not alluring to pure minds." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

he kept us safe, didn’t raise taxes...can’t complain


49 posted on 09/24/2009 4:51:43 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Book: Bush favored cap and trade”

Of course he did. Why wouldn’t he?


50 posted on 09/24/2009 5:08:54 PM PDT by Grunthor (Gun toting, Bible thumping Flag waver. According to the left, I am a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

See 42. Prescription drug plan for seniors that we could not afford. The government was spending way too much money BEFORE they did it.


51 posted on 09/24/2009 6:35:49 PM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
The war, both theaters, was enough.

Except that we now have Obama, who may very well roll most everything back in less than 4 years.

A shady character like his does not thrive in a vacuum ; Obama was THE most leftwing person in the Congress. Bush set the table with his growing government and spending and bailouts and the rest. He's got a good deal of culpability there, I'm afraid, IMO.

52 posted on 09/24/2009 9:30:59 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Dana Perino, former White House press secretary said that Matt Latimer was rarely even around Pres. Bush!

******

September 15, 2009

A Tall-Tale Tell-All [Dana Perino]

I knew Matt only a little bit. Now that an excerpt of his book is out, I’m reminded of what a veteran of three White Houses told me: Beware of the quiet guy in the room.

For example, he writes that President Bush didn’t know who Sarah Palin was. That’s rubbish — Bush had just met Palin the previous month in Alaska, and he mentioned that to me literally two seconds after McCain made his announcement. So much of what Latimer claims the president said don’t ring true to me. I was with the president for whole days at a time, through thick and thin, and I never heard him say things like that about others. And I don’t think he’s ever even said the word “keister.” C’mon.

I’m pretty sure that almost everyone who worked in the White House could not pick Matt out of a lineup, and I doubt that’ll change much after this book. Speechless should have been called “Shameless.”

http://tinyurl.com/yc3uyc5


53 posted on 09/24/2009 9:38:34 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bush’s former spokeswoman, Dana Perino, told Reuters that while she hadn’t read the book, “I think that most people who worked in the White House would be hard pressed to pick this guy out of a line-up.”

She adds: “He wasn’t around the president much, and some of what he says the president said doesn’t ring true to me. For example, I was there outside the Oval when Sarah Palin was announced as the VP candidate and the president said to me, ’so, the Governor of Alaska was the pick? I just saw her a few weeks ago when we were on our way to China’.”

Perino also said she doesn’t recall Bush saying anything about anyone’s keister. “I’m not sure how people who write these books really feel about themselves. Oh well,” she says.


54 posted on 09/24/2009 9:41:12 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Matt Latimer

55 posted on 09/24/2009 9:55:15 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Matt Latimer is but another in a long line of former White House staffers who demean the amazing opportunity to work at the highest levels of our republic by trashing it and selling it. And he attempts to justify those actions by implying that he is driven to do so by some self-righteous sense of duty that comes after making the shocking discovery that the White House isn’t exactly as romantic as he had dreamed.

Latimer expects to be given a pass for his gossipy ways by portraying himself as the young, Ronald-Reagan-inspired ideologue (cue ‘Morning in America’) who came to Washington to change the world. On his way to the top however, he made the awful discovery that Washington is actually a place where politics plays a part in decision-making, people make fun of other people and sometimes they, gasp, swear. For someone who purports to be so incredibly sharp, he sure is naïve.

http://townhall.com/columnists/BrianCJones/2009/09/25/an_executive_privilege


56 posted on 09/24/2009 9:56:05 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; rabscuttle385; La Enchiladita; BlueAngel; Cheetahcat; sickoflibs

Let’s Bush deny it if it’s not true.

Given everything else he supported like TARP and open borders I have no trouble believing this. None at all.


57 posted on 09/25/2009 9:00:13 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Impy

“Let’s Bush deny it if it’s not true.

Given everything else he supported like TARP and open borders I have no trouble believing this. None at all”

I put nothing past the Liberal George with Amnesty the troops in Jail and border agents and calling Americans names.


58 posted on 09/25/2009 11:00:56 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Cedric

Since rabscuttle is a RonPaulBot and Matt Latimer most likely a lib, a temp guy who worked a few weeks in the White House, you and your opinions are known by the company you keep.


59 posted on 09/25/2009 12:06:55 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Magic number = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Cedric; rabscuttle385; La Enchiladita; BlueAngel; Cheetahcat; sickoflibs

RE :”Let’s Bush deny it if it’s not true. Given everything else he supported like TARP and open borders I have no trouble believing this. None at all.”

Will we ever get rid of GWB?? Most of this book sounds a bit far fetched (stuff that MSNBC is pushing from it.) I wouldnt wast a character defending him, Cap and Trade never came up till McCain ran. We got enough real stuff against him, dont need unsourced crap.


60 posted on 09/25/2009 12:21:14 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson