Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration Will Cut Border Patrol Deployed on U.S-Mexico Border
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54514 ^ | September 24, 2009 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 09/25/2009 5:11:14 PM PDT by Talisker

Even though the Border Patrol now reports that almost 1,300 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border is not under effective control, and the Department of Justice says that vast stretches of the border are “easily breached,” and the Government Accountability Office has revealed that three persons “linked to terrorism” and 530 aliens from “special interest countries” were intercepted at Border Patrol checkpoints last year, the administration is nonetheless now planning to decrease the number of Border Patrol agents deployed on the U.S.-Mexico border.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Mexico; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bho44; bhodhs; bhodoj; borderpatrol; bordersecurity; dhs; homelandinsecurity; illegalalieninvasion; illegals; immigration; mexicanborder; narcoterror; sourcetitlenoturl
Why don't we just hang a rusty can on a post at the border, and then if any bad guys want to cross they can bang on it until a cop shows up.

That way, at least, we won't be pretending we're actually doing anything down there anymore.

1 posted on 09/25/2009 5:11:14 PM PDT by Talisker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Our nation is being eviscerated by these neo fascists.

May they be the first to suffer the consequences of their folly.


2 posted on 09/25/2009 5:13:04 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

How ‘bout that dumbass Janet Napolitano? I hope that someday Arizona can recover from all of the dumbass moves she made here.


3 posted on 09/25/2009 5:14:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Now, now. We all know those dastardly terrorists came from Canada.

Janet Obimbo said so.


4 posted on 09/25/2009 5:15:21 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

whey dont they cut pork instead?


5 posted on 09/25/2009 5:16:11 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

If we have little or no interior enforcement, the border is then nothing more than a gauntlet. Get past it and you’re home-free.


6 posted on 09/25/2009 5:19:18 PM PDT by umgud (Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
I would not be surprised to find that the Illegal Alien, a "Jordanian" (probably Palestinian), who tried to blow up a "landmark" building in downtown Dallas, came accross that “easily breached” border.

Until it's determined legally that he is an illegal alien, he gets accorded the same rights and treatment as an American citizen, or legal alien, accused of an ordinary crime. Once that is determined legally, things change. He'd be bound for GitMo, if we a President instead of a resident in the White House.

7 posted on 09/25/2009 5:25:42 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

30,000,000 uninsured. 47,000,000 uninsured, do I hear 60,000,000 uninsured. Future ACORNS, I guess


8 posted on 09/25/2009 5:27:28 PM PDT by theyreallthesame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

You’re almost there... Illegals are paying between $1,500 to $2,500 to come across the border. Just leave the rusty can on the post and ask for $20 each.


9 posted on 09/25/2009 5:31:05 PM PDT by theyreallthesame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Jim Quinn is right. WE HAVE ELECTED THE ENEMY! They are a cabal of neo-Marxists that have managed to weasel their way to the levers of power in this country and we had better get them out quick or we're finished as a free republic.
10 posted on 09/25/2009 6:01:12 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

It’s like getting rid of lifeguards at the city pool because only 1 person drowned in the past 10 years. Very liberal thinking.


11 posted on 09/25/2009 6:35:54 PM PDT by supermop (Somebody has to clean up the mess he will leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

This is from the 2004 Libertarian Party Platform (under Individual Rights).

“We call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally.”


12 posted on 09/25/2009 6:36:41 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

They’re bringing the amnesty bill back in Jan., so who needs a border patrol?


13 posted on 09/25/2009 6:38:49 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
This is from the 2004 Libertarian Party Platform... “We call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration...

Libertarians get a lot right - a whole lot. But immigration isn't one of them. They ignore the unlevel playing field that libertarian theory presumes to be non-existent. But it's only non-existent in a completely libertarian world - otherwise it's presumption is dangerously naive. That's why libertarianism only works best internally, where a level playing field can at least be theoretically created. Against international problems though, it would lead to slaughter.

14 posted on 09/25/2009 6:46:55 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

I’m not too fond of their goals of “gay marriage” and adoption and unrestrained military homosexuality and unrestrained abortion including late term abortions among other things either.


15 posted on 09/25/2009 6:51:46 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I’m not too fond of their goals of “gay marriage” and adoption and unrestrained military homosexuality and unrestrained abortion including late term abortions among other things either.

A person would literally have to be demonic to defend late-term abortion, so I won't explore that.

But I will say that I find it important that libertarians slam away at limiting government intervention in a variety of areas. Personally, I think gay marriage is one of these - it is a complete snow job over the huge pink elephant in the living room of government involvement in marriage at all. Marriage is spiritual, religious, based on love, private and has zero relevence to government authorization. It is the grossest of all boundary oversteps for the government to "license" a marriage, and it needs to stop.

I also think that there is a whole area of personal privacy rights that extend into healthcare, taxation, child raising and other areas that also include sexual rights which, if properly followed, would protect private adult sexuality of whatever kind while denying any special rights or hate crimes. But the baby's thrown out with the bathwater on that, too.

Just saying, as examples.

16 posted on 09/25/2009 7:01:51 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Marriage is spiritual, religious, based on love, private and has zero relevence to government authorization.

I just don't see two sodomites that way and no society in history has either until the post 20th century collapse of western civilization but if you think that America has so declined and distanced ourselves from our roots, then support the party of "demons".

17 posted on 09/25/2009 7:29:02 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I just don't see two sodomites that way ... but if you think that America has so declined and distanced ourselves from our roots, then support the party of "demons".

Jews specifically deny Jesus Christ as the Savior. What would you, personally, have the law do to them? How much Christianity should become the law of the land, in defiance of the doctrine of negative rights of the Constitution?

"Demons" look for arguments around freedom - any arguments. As long as "sodomites" are denied state marriage and have to find a church that will accept them, and if they are also denied special rights above and beyond those everyone else has, the rest is none of your business as long as they obey the law like anyone else.

18 posted on 09/26/2009 4:55:32 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

I’ll stick with all of human existence and not feel that I have to redefine a marriage as a couple of homosexual men moving in with each other.


19 posted on 09/26/2009 5:23:31 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I’ll stick with all of human existence...

I'll stick with the Constitution.

20 posted on 09/26/2009 5:25:56 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Me too, there is no “gay marriage” in it, or homos in the military, or “gay” adoption or abortion.


21 posted on 09/26/2009 5:31:48 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Me too, there is no “gay marriage” in it, or homos in the military, or “gay” adoption or abortion.

Then we agree - these are not legal issues. Under the Constitution, what is not specified is barred from government control.

22 posted on 09/26/2009 5:35:01 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

No the constitution guarantees the freedom of Americans to continue to ban “gay marriage” by law and for the federal government to ban homosexuality in the military by law and the right to protect the unborn by law etc.


23 posted on 09/26/2009 5:54:54 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
...the constitution guarantees the freedom of Americans to continue to ban...

LOL, so much for negative rights.

24 posted on 09/26/2009 6:42:24 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Try and sell your ideas to America of 1790.


25 posted on 09/26/2009 9:00:39 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson