Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici
He should be tossed in jail for attempted murder.

Murder charge would require intent.

But you could definitely go after a wreckless endangerment charge. No different than "drunk driving".

You don't have to get in an accident or hurt anyone to be convicted.

8 posted on 09/29/2009 10:45:20 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

reckless endangerment

wanton disregard

culpable negligence

take your pick. This homosexual intentional disregared medical safety and intentionally risked the lives of recipients. Intent was there, act was there. Canada will hit him with a wet noodle.


12 posted on 09/29/2009 10:50:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
But you could definitely go after a wreckless endangerment charge.

I guess "wreckless" would be at the core of the definition of "endangerment," assuming you were acting recklessly. Once the wreck occurred, it's no longer "endangerment."

46 posted on 09/29/2009 1:11:13 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson