Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pittsburgh Protest Promoters
Townhall.com ^ | September 30, 2009 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 09/30/2009 6:04:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

Radical-left protesters outside the G-20 summit meeting in Pittsburgh last week underlined once again that our friends in the news media see no real enemy or extremist to their left. But conservative protests against Team Obama are an ugly sign of incivility, and according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, even impending violence.

HBO talk show host Bill Maher exemplified the liberal-media attitude on his Twitter page on Sept. 24: "Even with a face full of tear gas, these G-20 protesters (are) better looking than the teabaggers."

But there's a big difference between the sea of tens of thousands of conservative protesters in Washington on Sept. 12 and the 3,000 anti-capitalist radicals in Pittsburgh. The tone from the podium in Washington was happy and patriotic, which meant nothing to The Washington Post, which covered it as an outpouring of a "spectrum of conservative anger."

But in Pittsburgh, protesters on Sept. 24 assembled with no permit to march, and destroyed property on their route. On radical Pacifica Radio, they championed a guy calling himself Rev. Billy of the Church of Life After Shopping. He sounded like Nancy Pelosi's nightmare: " Some of us will go to jail today! We will take care of you! We will be there when you get out!" And then this: "Some of us may lose our lives today! We will respect you! You will be our heroes!"

No one heard this rant on national TV.

As usual, network reporters couldn't even place these fringe activists as "liberal," let alone far-left. On "The Early Show" on CBS, viewers could see wacky signs that read "No Bailouts, No Capitalism" and "No Borders, No Banks." But amazingly, reporter Susan Koeppen portrayed them as nonpartisan police ... victims. "Protesters have been hit with a massive police presence," she announced. "During the day, police set off pepper spray, forcing marchers and the media to flee." Koeppen mentioned in passing that the protesters had no permit, but she let the leftists run down the cops. "There is no freedom of speech in this country; there is no right to assemble!" claimed one. "These are all rights that have been violated today!"

Speaking of Nancy Pelosi, her old Democratic primary opponent Cindy Sheehan was outraged at the Pittsburgh police presence as well. She blogged: "Pittsburgh is what a police state looks like! ... We're like ants trying to struggle against anteaters. ... The cops and soldiers should be ashamed of themselves for allowing their selves to be used as tools of the Robber Class 'elites.'"

When Sheehan savaged George Bush, she was the darling of the major media. She was lovingly interviewed by Chris Matthews and he urged her to run for Congress.

In Pittsburgh, she was ignored.

CNN demonstrated a dramatic contrast in protest coverage. For the conservatives on Sept. 12, they found violent radicals. For the leftists on Sept. 24, they found peaceful nonpartisans.

CNN producer Jim Spellman couldn't find a scary nut in Washington on Sept. 12, so he aired canned footage of a man -- somewhere in Michigan -- holding an AK-47 and talking of a possible civil war. This allowed our intrepid CNN correspondent to highlight a "dark undercurrent" poisoning the right: "It's a bit of a dark undercurrent. You have the bulk of the people that are there for low taxes, less government control, but there really is an element that's got these kind of outlandish conspiracy theories about death camps and about the, you know, this takeover, people comparing President Obama to Hitler. That really is a sizable thread. It's not just a couple of people on the edges."

In Pittsburgh, CNN reporter Brian Todd sang from the usual protest songbook, highlighting the "very, very diverse" nature of the protesters: "We're told this is the biggest march in Pittsburgh since the 1970s, estimated at least a few thousand people. But it is much more peaceful, less confrontational. Very, very diverse group of protesters here, everyone from people protesting the Chinese occupation of Tibet, to women's rights groups, to anti-capitalists."

Todd interviewed organizer Pete Shell and asked if he worried that anarchists would cause trouble: "I wasn't that concerned about it, because, actually, they have marched with us in the past, and they have been peaceful." Todd said nothing about Shell's website, which touts every radical cause from the "Cuba Solidarity Project" to sympathy for convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. There was no "dark undercurrent" in that interview.

For the record, Speaker Pelosi: In Pittsburgh, there were 3,000 protesters and 200 were arrested. In Washington, D.C., there were reportedly 75,000 protesters. Try to find a report on a single arrest.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: agenda; brentbozell; cindysheehan; democrats; enemedia; leftwingextremism; liberalfascism; liberalmedia; lsm; mediabias; msm; obamedia; pravdamedia

1 posted on 09/30/2009 6:04:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Even with a face full of tear gas, these G-20 protesters (are) better looking than the teabaggers."

Patriotism and peace = bad, Marxism and anarchy = good. Allow me to introduce you to to Americas liberal media.

2 posted on 09/30/2009 6:09:36 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Even with a face full of tear gas, these G-20 protesters (are) better looking than the teabaggers.”

Just shows how truly shallow Libs. are. By the way, Bill maher is no Adonis!


3 posted on 09/30/2009 6:10:16 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Bill Maher is an unhappy little man.


4 posted on 09/30/2009 6:12:34 AM PDT by polymuser ("We have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!" (HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In Washington, D.C., there were reportedly 75,000 protesters.

Let's say 500,000, but why quibble over a measly 425,000 people....

5 posted on 09/30/2009 6:13:08 AM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Napoleon Syndrome?


6 posted on 09/30/2009 6:13:41 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
There was another huge difference in addition to the civility vs uncivility, the all-American vs anti-American, and the cleanliness vs the filth...and that was measured at about 500X.


912: AMERICAN CITIZENS AWAKEN TO AMERICA'S CALL

7 posted on 09/30/2009 6:14:38 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Check out post nuymber 7 and the link. There were over a million people there. So the quibling, IMHO, is really about 925,000 or more. But when the left is marginalizing something and you’re already at those orders of magnitude, they scoff at another 2X.


8 posted on 09/30/2009 6:17:07 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"In Washington, D.C., there were reportedly 75,000 an unreported 1.5 million protesters"

There... Fixed it

9 posted on 09/30/2009 6:20:09 AM PDT by Mr. K (THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But there's a big difference between the sea of tens of thousands of conservative protesters in Washington on Sept. 12 and the 3,000 anti-capitalist radicals in Pittsburgh.

There's an even bigger difference: The protesters are funded by the leftist "capitalists" inside the G-20 meetings. They're very useful idiots.

10 posted on 09/30/2009 6:28:05 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A must see video on this subject:

Liberal Media Hypocrisy Test


11 posted on 09/30/2009 6:44:51 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

I have seen the video and the hypocrisy from the left wing media is just amazing


12 posted on 09/30/2009 6:49:46 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
If you have noticed Brent Bozell did not claim that there were 75,000 protesters. He wrote that there were reportedly 75,000 protesters. The point he is making that the State run media should try to find a single arrest of the 75,000 or 500,000 protesters. It can't find none
13 posted on 09/30/2009 6:58:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Bill Maher’s face has an artificial look,like he’s an evil android or something.He’s a legitimate POS who takes up space in the world without adding anything.
Hopefully, one of these days his smartass mouth won’t be able to get him out of a bad fix.


14 posted on 09/30/2009 7:04:43 AM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

BM (how appropriate) is one of the ugliest pieces of s**t on the public stage. Talk about glass houses!


15 posted on 09/30/2009 7:04:48 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


16 posted on 09/30/2009 7:16:31 AM PDT by Tribune7 (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
"Even with a face full of tear gas, these G-20 protesters (are) better looking than the teabaggers."

Is Bill speaking from his own experience with tea bagging?

17 posted on 09/30/2009 7:26:45 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Brent, Brent, Brent ... why in heck are you going with the 75,000 number? Why? Minimum 1 million, maximum 2 million, more likey around 1.8 million.


18 posted on 09/30/2009 7:38:46 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
He is not going with the 75,000 number. He said reportedly 75,000, which means it was reported by the media that it was 75,000. That is not his conclusion.
19 posted on 09/30/2009 7:46:47 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for 0bama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bill Maher= Useful Idiot

He would be one of the first to be eliminated if the G-20 protesters reached their goal of total anarchy.


20 posted on 09/30/2009 7:48:19 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hate to admit it, but I’m with Mother Sheehan on this one.
Downtown Pittsburgh WAS transformed into a police state during the G20. Fenced off like the Baghdad Green Zone, had to present your papers at checkpoints, most gave up on the idea of coming to work. All to cater to the Bamster and his Global Elitist buddies. Really annoying if your tax dollars pay to maintain those closed streets.


21 posted on 09/30/2009 8:01:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

LOL. I wouldn’t be surprised.


22 posted on 09/30/2009 8:24:54 AM PDT by Tribune7 (I am Joe Wilson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

It’s always the liberals throwing around the word like it is so vile and dirty....I think they do protest too much. ;^)


23 posted on 09/30/2009 8:32:00 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Blankety blankety blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

bookmark


24 posted on 09/30/2009 8:45:23 AM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He’s a media CRITIC. Why go with the media number here?


25 posted on 09/30/2009 10:10:44 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Try 1.6 million.


26 posted on 09/30/2009 10:58:25 AM PDT by mombrown1 (PA Coordinatior SAS The Second Amendment is the reset button for the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mombrown1
Try 1.6 million

As a conservative, I was being conservative....

27 posted on 09/30/2009 10:44:29 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson