If you look into the evo-religious assumptions that go into Temple of Darwin dating methods, you will find that they are just as subjective as their human evolution fairytale.
I take it you have made yourself an expert on this. Please enlighten the readers.
To: ColdWater; All
==I take it you have made yourself an expert on this. Please enlighten the readers.
Radiometric Dating Questions and Answers
What is radiocarbon dating? Is it accurate?
Are there examples of inaccurate results obtained from the potassium/argon dating method (the most cited method)?
How can the radiometric dates of millions and billions of years old be so wrong?
Is there any evidence that radioactive decay rate might not have been constant?
What is the current creationist thinking on radiohalos (formerly called ‘pleochroic halos’)?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson